That is the natural law on display when in comes to supply and demand. Women are demanding privacy so they can either supply it or lose business to someone who does supply the privacy they desire.
It's weird the way the boycotting has worked out...
The left would threaten to boycott Starbucks because a couple of black guys got kicked out, and companies would immediately kowtow, fire someone, and require all employees to take some racial training on how to speak to black people....or they would simply ignore it and within roughly 2 weeks the boycott simply never materialized. In two weeks, the online mob would move onto something else.
The right on the other hand...they have Kid Rock shoot some beer cans, and because the main demographic of Bud Light didn't want to drink from cans with a little gay man dressed in a woman on them...it appeared to the outside observer that the "boycott" was real and costly. Bud Light tried to double down at first....and its consumer base just disappeared. Now businesses hear a mere threat of a boycott from the right and they start trying to cover their tracks and reverse course immediately.
I'm not saying that the right somehow organizes boycotts better....but guys didn't want to drink beer with a gay mascot on the can and businesses now worry if anyone on the right side of the aisle suggests a boycott lol.
This is funny. Some people cling so hard to conservatism that they demand that laws should be changed.
You don't think this happens on the left?
That should be the opposite of right-wing rhetoric. So politically people care more about having the right to carry a firearm whenever they want but they don't want to ensure that people have privacy when they take a shower or a dump?
Perhaps if you ran for office on your "dump privacy" laws you could get elected.
It seems like this line of thinking is more caveman-ish than anything that a modern thinker does. It's like "We should have the right to kill someone on sight but we don't have a right to privacy on the crapper."
We already have the right to own firearms....it's in the founding document.
Nobody really has a right to kill anyone on sight.
It is so easy to add a larger door that doesn't allow people to peek inside, if they can't accomplish that simple consumer demand, they deserve for people to vote for someone else with their wallet.
I've never been in the women's locker room so I've never known they have doors on their showers. I assumed they had a big tile room with a drain in the middle and shower heads on the walls.
I went to a restaurant where there was a door on every stall that was lined up all in a row.
Most restaurants I've eaten at had doors on the stalls. They also had urinals. This is a key factor in lines for the men's room being shorter.
Why fight about men's and women's bathrooms/showers when some war can be waged to steal other countries' natural resources? That is more in the right-wing conservative wheelhouse.
Are we talking about the Ukraine here or the impending war with Iran?
Trump didn't start any wars....but he did kill a general. If that war with Iran starts...we should be happy he removed that guy. Time magazine was doing articles on his talent.
