I am fully aware of your belief Jesus was just another prophet as Isaiah or any of the others of the Old Testament. You could not be further from the truth, which of those prophets prophesied and fulfilled of their own death and resurrection, which of those are seated on the right hand of the father?
He is one of the mightiest Prophets of GOD, and has been tasked with returning to spread peace and justice within the Earth, so no not quite another Prophet at all.
Where did he predicts his own death and resurrection?
Seated at the right hand of GOD in reference to returning perhaps. In either case, I'm sure he himself would not have said such a thing; likely words put in his mouth?
Acts 10:38 How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him.
Clearly explained in Acts 2:22 "Fellow Israelites, listen to this: Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders and signs, which God did among you through him, as you yourselves know."
While Jesus was the sinless Son of God He worked on this earth in human form anointed of God to perform the works that we read of. He submitted Himself as a man and was subject to the same temptations we are, yet without sin. He took on our sin, Hebrews 4:15, 2 Corinthians 5:21.
Teachings of Paul are very popular with you Christians.
All prophets were not the SINLESS Son of God sent to redeem mankind!
Again not something Jesus pbuh said, rather words put into his mouth by unknown Greek writers.
I didn't see a single verse saying 3 separate beings are together ONE GOD. Perhaps you could have another look?
There is a lot you don’t or just refuse to see in the Holy Bible.
I went through all of them, and no where does it give the formula: The Father, Son and Holy Ghost are Three separate beings who together are One God. Such a radical departure from thousands of years of History, yet Jesus pbuh decided not to teach and explain it?!
I said, "Muhammad pbuh is mentioned by name and his description given in the Song of Solomon 5." FALSE!
Was he Solomon, Jesus or Muhammad ?
Muhammad's name appeared in Haggai 2:7 under the hebrew word
mahmad (
) which means praised one (Muhammad is Arabic for praised one). It almost undoubtedly is referring to the Arabic Prophet Muhammad.
The 5th chapter of Songs of Solomon is discussing someone. Jews will say it is discussing Solomon, while Christians will say it is discussing Jesus. Considering this is the Songs of Solomon, it would seem logical that it is discussing Solomon. The verses describing this mystery man have the narators speech conjuagted in the feminine (meaning it is a woman who is describing this man) so it is possible that it is one of Solomon's wives discussing her Husband (Solomon). However, if a Christian tries to assert that Jesus is being discussed, then they are insinuating that this is discussing a future prophet (a man who was not yet alive at that point), a prophesy.... If the 5th chapter of Songs of Solomon is looking into the future, then there is no doubt it is discussing Muhammad.
Throughout the chapter, someone is being discussed. Whomever it is, verse 15 says his "countenance (face) is as Lebanon", so this is an Arabic gentleman (or Arab looking), a Semitic man none the less. Verse 11 says "his head is as the most fine gold, his locks are wavy, and black as a raven". Verse 10 describes this man as being "radiant and ruddy" which means he was slightly light-skinned with a rosy color. This can be confirmed in the Sahih Bukhari Hadiths,
Volume 4, Book 56, Number 747, which says Muhammad was slightly light skinned, with a rosy color (and also has the same hair as is mentioned in verse 11). Also verse 14 describes this man as having a stomach like ivory. I take it this means the parts of his body that were usually covered by his garment from the sun, were very white (like ivory). This also can be atributed to Muhammad who although having a rosy, golden color, had white armpitts (
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 2, Book 17, Number 141 says you could see the whites of his armpitt when he raised his hand). WHAT'S THE POINT?!?!
Discussing skin color, and hair color is fruitless, and if I was basing it solely on that, it could be describing ANY Semitic man. However, this person's name is given. In reading the English translation of Songs 5:16 it finishes the description by saying "He is altogether lovely". The words "altogether lovely" was translated from
mahmad (
). We'll take a closer look at this four character word, and prove this is talking about Muhammad...
First of all, the way this word is written is Hebrew is
. That happens to be the EXACT same was Muhammad's name is written in Hebrew. Let's look at the spelling of this word...
It has four characters. Going from right to left they are...
Now, when writing in Hebrew, there is no difference between the word
mahmad (
) and Muhammad (
). The only difference is in the vowels used when pronouncing this word (
). Hebrew is an ancient language, and there are no vowels. It is made up of 22 consonants. In ancient times, the reader decided on his own which vowels to add in. It was not until the 8th century that vowels were introduced, in the form of dots and lines. However, this has nothing to do with real Hebrew. The word
mahmad (
) in ancient times would most likely have been pronounced "mahamad".
According to Ben Yehuda's Hebrew-English Dictionary,
is correctly pronounced "mahamad" (not mahmad) which is very close to Muhammad.
Ben Yehuda's Hebrew-English Dictionary defines "
" as "lovely, coveted one, precious one,
praised one". The correct way to say "praised one" in Arabic is Muhammad, so this is the same word!
As was stated before, the name Muhammad (
) and the word
mahmad (
) are spelled exactly the same way in Hebrew, and both have the same meaning. The only reason they are pronounced different is because of vowels (dots and lines) introduced in the
eigth century.
The Hebrew word for praised one is
The Hebrew word for Muhammad (the Arabic Prophet) is
In conclusion, if Songs of Solomon chapter 5 is discussing a man to come after that time, it is without a doubt Muhammad, as it even mentions his name and gives his description. Any Christian who believes Jesus is the Messiah, and believes that books were sent down by God after the TaNaKh (Jewish Bible), then surely they should take into account what they just read here, and consider the Qur'an before making a decision.
Solomon
As shown above, you can show people as much as you like, but if they don't accept, then it's not my problem.
Christians have yet to explain who came from Saudi Arabia with a new Covenant, who was told to read, and said, 'I can't read', who stirred up jealousy, who came with 10,000 Saints and a fiery law. Who came from the tents of Kedar in Arabia, from the blessed house of GOD open day and night.
Rather than care what Trinitarians like to think, I prefer to relay the words of one of Judaism's Greatest Scholars:
Maimonides’ firm character could be seen right from the prologue to his legal opinion: he does not consider it proper to repay Muslims with the same coin “for lies which they invent falsely about us” and to take revenge by lying about their religious persuasion and to smear them with a label of idolatry: “
Muslims are not idolaters at all. <Idolatry> has already been cut from their mouth and heart and they are totally and properly committed to One God (yiḥud raʾuy) without flaw.”62 Maimonides rejects the first charge with the argument that although these places have been ancient shrines of paganish gods, Muslims who pray in their direction (qibla) and make pilgrimages towards them today, do not have idolatry in mind at all, and so they are not even considered idolaters by the Jewish law:
“And if somebody says that the house that they praise (al-Kaʿba) is an idolatrous shrine and an idol is hidden in it, which their fathers used to worship – what’s wrong about it? Those who prostrate themselves today in its direction, have on their minds only God (eyn libbam ella leshamayim).
The sages in Sanhedrin had already explained that if somebody prostrates themselves in the direction of an idolatrous shrine whilst he thinks that it is a synagogue, his heart is turned to God 63.
Equally all these Muslims today, including children and women, idolatry is cut off from their mouth... In the question of oneness of God they are not deceived at all.”64
https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/091911113_Boušek.pdf
Are you now budding up with Jews? That is encouraging.
They will be relieved to hear that.
As we can see, we worship the same GOD, without a hint of Duality, let alone Trinity.
