Islam Are Allah and God of the Bible the same Person?

SteveCaruso

Translator
May 17, 2010
812
555
✟54,511.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I'm just copying and pasting from biblegateway.com - They need your Scholarly input to add footnotes, explaining these things.

More accurately, you're not reading these things in proper context with the requisite experience to make sense of them.

It's like someone arguing from Strong's Numbers against a linguist who actually works in the field.

Firstly the Anglican Bishop isn't pouring over Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, he's just forming his opinion based on the books of Scholars in the field, like Professor Ehrman.

Not *quite*. Spong is a curious character.

Secondly it's hardly surprising that he would, after reading such 'enlightening' material start questioning what it means to be a 'Christian'. May Allah swt guide him to the truth.

Not *quite*, either. Spong's thing is more what one would call "Post-Christianity" (which is also Post-Islam, Post-Judaism, etc. etc.). It's pretty much therapeutic deism with a Christian veneer. He's further from Islam than Christianity at this point, and isn't really coming back. :)

Btw is it just Aramaic you specialise in, or do you study other Semitic languages too?

Aramaic languages are really my forté. In terms of other Semitic languages, I have a research-level grasp of Classical Hebrew, and a comparative linguistics grasp of Arabic, Ethiopic/Ge'ez, Ugaritic, Phoenician/Punic, and a couple others (I can translate accurately, but can't synthesize well).
 
  • Agree
Reactions: benelchi
Upvote 0

DWA2DAY

convictions are worse Enemies of Truth than Lies!
Nov 12, 2016
416
62
59
Paarl Western Cape
✟20,716.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So that's now 500 years than you previously stated, so we have made progress and shown the Kaaba was in existence before the advent of Prophet Muhammad pbuh.

Come now I said "At Best" a tented camp from the occasional traveller on a camel is by far no were near what traditional Islamic sources say about Mecca.

Yes all good fun for revisionists to attempt to re-write History. Fringe Scholarship as you would say.

Please how do you go from archaeological records to fringe scholars. You accept nothing unless it agrees with you. Besides the point been made there are questions that need to be answered, Muslims have managed to sweep them under the carpet long enough. and we can engage and discuss them like adults or you can claim every text is corrupt every scholar is wrong every view is false, because you scholar says so.



Jay and others used amateur christian archaeologist Dan Gibson's research, and the Dan Brubaker's thesis, Intentional Changes in Koran Manuscripts. Gibson has not done any digging under the Kabaa, nor would he ever be allowed to, and the conclusions drawn beyond the initial orientalist sensationalism of Brubaker's work showed the narrative of the Muslims and our assertion, we have the Qur'an as revealed by the Prophet pbuh is largely correct. Jay Smith knew all this, yet takes the stand and shouts his speech, and then changes subject matters the following week, claiming poor memory:

No matter what your view is the fact is still there, I too have done no digging under a Kaaba, in fact I do not dig in my own garden, but this does not say I can not comment of people in the field.
Same as you view with postview, why discuss our scripture if you do not think they trust worth, if you can not respect our faith and the text that goes with it there can not be a discussion. however you quick to quote John's Gospel to make a point.
Not to mention the fact the quran is clear from you to respect and honour the christian text. Therefore in light of this from your own Holy Book you then saying it to is false and trust worthy.

“In analyzing the arguments of scholars who challenge the account of the Islamic sources, Nicolai Sinai of Oxford University observes that epigraphic data and historical evidence “would allow us to take most of what the Islamic sources say at face value, and it is not clear why, in the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary, this should not be our default position?”
Well its not the default position because he is wrong and many do not agree with him.

Regards Doug
 
Upvote 0

Limo

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2015
649
70
58
✟42,975.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
Biggest load of junk I have ever read. In my BC day I would be asking what you smoking? As sound like a great trip.

Regards Doug
I smoke the most up to date researches done by the most experienced professors who spent their life studying the Bible.
Give it a try and read modern researches about "Jesus never existed" ,"Historical Jesus", and "Christ myth theory"


I like to smoke these studies as It's compliant with Islamic belief and my view to Christianity and Jesus-Christ
Regards
 
Upvote 0

Limo

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2015
649
70
58
✟42,975.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
Sorry, I always mix Latin with Greek.
Good to confirm that there is no NT in Semitic languages.

May I know why using noun משׁיח is improper ?
It would be more convenient if It's translated as is literally Al-Masseh especially it relates him to the OT prophecies.
Regards

I was speaking in terms of grammar i.e. a common noun is a noun that doesn't describe a specific person or place i.e. a book, a table, etc... a proper name is a noun that describes a specific person or place i.e. Jesus, Arabia, etc...[/QUOTE]

We've cases in Bible and also in Quran.
Also, most of names are derived from a verb or an attribute.
I read that "Mariam" mother of Al-Masseh is something like "Be loved by Allah"
Ismail which is Ishmael in Bible means "Hear or listen, Allah"

It would be very beneficiary for early Christy to relate Al-Masseh to OT prophecies about the Al-Masseh by using the name Al-Masseh.

I was wondering also, Christians rarely use the word Al-Masseh or El-messiah

I think there is a valuable reason to use a translated name instead of using the original language name
Regards
 
Upvote 0

Limo

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2015
649
70
58
✟42,975.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
Limo sorry but I need to correct you again.
I am not a slave of Allah, I am a Child of the Living God, who sent his Son Jesus Christ to die for my sins and give me freedom and everlasting life. I have been baptised in his spirit and thus enjoy the pleasure of addoption and joint hier with Christ in all the riches of my Father (Yahweh- the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob)
It's for us not for you. "slaves of the Most Beneficent (Allah)" is an admired stage that one has to fulfill certain behaviour.
One of this behavior is to respond to insult words like yours with "reply back with mild words of gentleness"
in Arabic سلاماً Salama, means Peace Peace
 
Upvote 0

Mrs.PGL

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 12, 2015
439
271
windsor ontario
✟69,644.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If someone has already submitted this, please forgive me....Jesus would never teach:
Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"
 
Upvote 0

Muslim-UK

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2015
406
162
53
✟14,751.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
If someone has already submitted this, please forgive me....Jesus would never teach:
Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"

Jesus pbuh isn't GOD, so correct he wouldn't say something he may not have had knowledge of.
 
Upvote 0

Mrs.PGL

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 12, 2015
439
271
windsor ontario
✟69,644.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus pbuh isn't GOD, so correct he wouldn't say something he may not have had knowledge of.
Ahhhh, you haven't learned that yet! Whether you believe Jesus is God, that is irrelevant. God would not condemn His people that way. That is my point.
 
Upvote 0

Muslim-UK

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2015
406
162
53
✟14,751.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
Whatever resulting schisms followed some of the early ecumenical councils did not constitute starting a brand new church.

You present a lovely picture of early Christianity. One can only imagine the invited Bishops having a civilised natter over tea and passing around a selection of Niblo's biscuits.

Having looked into matters, I do have some questions for you:

Where was Constantine's seat of power before he decided to be Emperor over all the controlled lands?
What was his full name, and did he ever adopt any names?
What was the beliefs Constantine followed before he was introduced to Christianity?
What was his battle with Emperor Maxentius about?
Where can one observe murals depicting the battle?
Was there any other noticeable memorials depicting the event created?
What kind of person was Constantine?
What became of his wife Fausta and son Crispus?
Where did he move his powerhouse to?
What effect did Christianity have on him?
How many Bishops did he invite to Nicea in 325
What did Christian leaders think about his character?

Sure, but the existence of a pretty thorough consensus of belief can be seen in the writings of the fathers. When I presented such an example of such you, in our previous discussion, merely chose to dismiss it.

I'm sure we will be going over all the material presented before coming to any conclusions.

There were, fundamentally, two sides in the dispute: the Arian view and the view that has become known as the Nicene view.

Where was Arian drawing his evidence from?

Nobody at the council, nor anyone involved in the dispute, argued that Jesus was merely a remarkable man; everyone involved Jesus was divine, and called Him "God". The dispute was centered exclusively on what that meant; was Jesus another God entirely (the Arian view) or was Jesus the same God as the Father (the view of Alexander and what is asserted in the symbol put forward at Nicea.

I imagine the people present at the Council were non Jews? If so, what would son of God mean to their culture and understanding?

That Jesus was divine was taken for granted; but what that meant was hashed out in the early centuries. There were groups that rejected Jesus' divinity entirely, but they were not by any means connected with anything resembling a Christian mainstream: the Ebionites, as best as we can tell, were a sect of Judaizing Christians who regarded Jesus to be an ordinary mortal human being..

Perhaps this is where Arian was getting his teachings from?

Such views were never entertained in anything resembling the Christian mainstream; and does not resemble anything of the earliest available material in the Christian historical record; of which the recognized authentically Pauline literary corpus is the earliest--that is to say, to postulate some "pure" pre-Pauline Christianity of which the "Pauline" variety is a corruption is to engage in idle speculation, there exists nothing earlier than Paul by which to discern Christian beliefs, and it would seem to be (at least Paul's own opinion) that what he has to say was consistent with already established beliefs of the Christian community, c.f. 1 Corinthians 15:3-9

The alternative largely amounts to speculation and conspiracy theory.
1 Cor 15:
3 For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, 5 and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. 6 Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. 7 Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. 8 Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me. 9 For I am the least of the apostles, unworthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.

3 - Where is this written in the scripture?
4 - " " "
5 - I thought Judas was killed, leaving 11?
8 - Where did Paul see Jesus pbuh?
9 - When was Paul made an Apostle?
 
Upvote 0

Muslim-UK

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2015
406
162
53
✟14,751.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
Ahhhh, you haven't learned that yet! Whether you believe Jesus is God, that is irrelevant. God would not condemn His people that way. That is my point.

Thanks for clarifying:

GOD destroys people that set up rivals to him. GOD also sends his chosen people Prophets to guide them back to the right path, and he keeps sending them whilst they mock, ridicule and kill some of them. Eventually GOD removes the favour bestowed upon them, and raises a new people, a GOD fearing people that will keep his commandments, and worship Him alone.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Mrs.PGL

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 12, 2015
439
271
windsor ontario
✟69,644.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Thanks for clarifying:

GOD destroys people that set up rivals to him. GOD also sends his chosen people Prophets to guide them back to the right path, and he keeps sending them whilst they mock, ridicule and kill some of them. Eventually GOD removes the favour bestowed upon them, and raises a new people, a GOD fearing people that will keep his commandments, and worship Him alone.
And God would not hurt His own people. Islam does not follow God.
 
Upvote 0

Muslim-UK

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2015
406
162
53
✟14,751.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
And God would not hurt His own people. Islam does not follow God.

You just don't read your own Bible. Do you recall Moses pbuh coming down the mountain with the 10 Commandments, and one being 'thou shall not kill'. What was the first thing he did that involved 3000 of God's people?
 
Upvote 0

Mrs.PGL

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 12, 2015
439
271
windsor ontario
✟69,644.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You just don't read your own Bible. Do you recall Moses pbuh coming down the mountain with the 10 Commandments, and one being 'thou shall not kill'. What was the first thing he did that involved 3000 of God's people?
I see...so am I correct that you think the God of Christians wants you to kill His people? He wasn't satisfied with Christ's death on the cross for them. He needs you to kill them?
 
Upvote 0

Muslim-UK

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2015
406
162
53
✟14,751.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
I see...so am I correct that you think the God of Christians wants you to kill His people? He wasn't satisfied with Christ's death on the cross for them. He needs you to kill them?

Kill Christians?? Try and keep it civilised, as I could cite a work by 2 Evangelical pastors, who travelled the World to detail all the Christians killed around the world since 33AD, and they put the blame for at least 5.5 Million of those deaths firmly at the feet of fellow 'Christians' and many of the methods used make Isis and others look like nice people.

There are Tens of Millions of Christians living in Muslim Countries, and have done so for 14 Centuries. Here's some facts both from within the Bible and sources kept out of it showing there was no blood death on the cross or tree as recorded by Paul:

Jesus pbuh had the ability to change his appearance and travel instantly between places. From the NT he appeared to be a gardener to Mary and then travelled with 2 companions that didn't recognise his voice or physical appearance, Luke 24:13-16. He was able to appear to his disciples who were in a locked room John 20:19. Gospel of Mark 15 says, a man called Jesus Barabbas (Son of God) was set free and Simon carried the cross. Could you read trough Mark 15 KJV and let me know when Simon gave the cross to Jesus?

Paul writes before the 4 Gospels and tries really hard to convince people that Jesus pbuh had died and resurrected. This from the NT:

1 Cor 15:12 Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13 But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. 14 And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. 15 We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised. 16 For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised. 17 And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins.

Clearly there were many people who didn't believe their Messiah had been killed.

Jesus pbuh himself prayed all night to be saved:
luke 22:44 And having been in agony, He was praying more earnestly. And His sweat became like great drops of blood falling down upon the ground. <<<praying to be saved

John 11:41-42 shows his prayers were ALWAYS heard. No wonder of course, as his name means, 'God Saves'.

6 disciples outside of the NT write to say another whose name was Simon was crucified in error by the enemies of Jesus pbuh.

"Come therefore, let us go on with the completion of the will of the incorruptible Father. For behold, those who will bring them judgment are coming, and they will put them to shame. But me they cannot touch. And you, O Peter, shall stand in their midst. Do not be afraid because of your cowardice. Their minds shall be closed, for the invisible one has opposed them."

When he had said those things, I saw him seemingly being seized by them. And I said "What do I see, O Lord? That it is you yourself whom they take, and that you are grasping me? Or who is this one, glad and laughing on the tree? And is it another one whose feet and hands they are striking?"

The Savior said to me, "He whom you saw on the tree, glad and laughing, this is the living Jesus. But this one into whose hands and feet they drive the nails is his fleshly part, which is the substitute being put to shame, the one who came into being in his likeness. But look at him and me."

But I, when I had looked, said "Lord, no one is looking at you. Let us flee this place."

But he said to me, "I have told you, 'Leave the blind alone!'. And you, see how they do not know what they are saying. For the son of their glory instead of my servant, they have put to shame."

And I saw someone about to approach us resembling him, even him who was laughing on the tree. And he was <filled> with a Holy Spirit, and he is the Savior. And there was a great, ineffable light around them, and the multitude of ineffable and invisible angels blessing them. And when I looked at him, the one who gives praise was revealed.

The Apocalypse of Peter -- The Nag Hammadi Library 80-100 AD
Early Christian Writings: New Testament, Apocrypha, Gnostics, Church Fathers

Many early Christian sects did not believe Jesus was crucified. Jesus laughed with joy:

Wherefore he did not himself suffer death, but Simon, a certain man of Cyrene, being compelled, bore the cross in his stead; so that this latter being transfigured by him, that he might be thought to be Jesus, was crucified, through ignorance and error, while Jesus himself received the form of Simon, and, standing by, laughed at them. For since he was an incorporeal power, and the Nous (mind) of the unborn father, he transfigured himself as he pleased, and thus ascended to him who had sent him, deriding them, inasmuch as he could not be laid hold of, and was invisible to all. Those, then, who know these things have been freed from the principalities who formed the world; so that it is not incumbent on us to confess him who was crucified, but him who came in the form of a man, and was thought to be crucified, and was called Jesus, and was sent by the Father.

(The Church Father Iranaeus, Against Heresies, Chapter XXIV.-Doctrines of Saturninus and Basilides) <<< Basilides was an early Gnostic religious teacher in Alexandria, Egypt who taught from 117 to 138 AD, and claimed to have inherited his teachings from Matthew.

Notice how Iranaeus says “through ignorance and error” the Jews misapprehended, and crucified the wrong person. Amazingly, the Holy Qur'an harmonises this account, stating that they follow error, conjecture, and ignorance:

That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not: (Al-Quran 4:157)

The 1945 discovery of Gnostic texts at Nag Hammadi, Egypt unearthed a book called The Second Treatise of the Great Seth, 55-56 AD where Jesus states:

I did not succumb to them as they had planned. But I was not afflicted at all. Those who were there punished me. And I did not die in reality but in appearance, lest I be put to shame by them because these are my kinsfolk. I removed the shame from me and I did not become fainthearted in the face of what happened to me at their hands. I was about to succumb to fear, and I suffered according to their sight and thought, in order that they may never find any word to speak about them. For my death, which they think happened, (happened) to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death. For their Ennoias did not see me, for they were deaf and blind. But in doing these things, they condemn themselves. Yes, they saw me; they punished me. It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I. They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. It was another upon Whom they placed the crown of thorns. But I was rejoicing in the height over all the wealth of the archons and the offspring of their error, of their empty glory. And I was laughing at their ignorance. (The Treatise of the Great Seth)

“There are also several historical sources other than the Bible and the Qur'an which confirm that many of the early Christians did not believe that Jesus died on the cross...The Cerinthians and later the Basilidians, for example, who were among the first of the early Christian communities, denied that Jesus was crucified...The Carpocratians, another early Christian sect, believed that it was not Jesus who was crucified, but another in his place”.
(Jesus Prophet of Islam, Muhammad Ataur-Raheem, Ahmed Thompson, 1996 (revised edition. p47)

“… Plotinus, who lived in the fourth century, tells us that he had read a book called The Journies of the Apostles which related the acts of Peter, John, Andrew, Barnabas, Thomas and Paul. Among other things, it stated that Jesus was not crucified, but another in his place, and therefore, he laughed at those who believed that they had crucified him”.
(ibid, Jesus Prophet of Islam, 1991 edition. P. 37) acts of john 97-101 AD

Throw into the mix the facts, you don't have the originals, widespread editing from Scribes and Church Fathers, fabricated letters and epistles, disagreement between John and the Synoptics about what was said at the trial, where the trial was, the day and time of the crucifixion, and events surrounding the empty tomb, and it is plain to see you can not be sure of anything, and go by blind faith alone.

The good news is using free will, you can believe what you like. When board member ViaCrucis responds, I shall hopefully be sharing what I've uncovered about Constantine, the 4th Century Emperor of the Romans. It's around this time that Church doctrine is finalised and lots of manuscripts start appearing.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
37,457
26,886
Pacific Northwest
✟732,154.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
You present a lovely picture of early Christianity. One can only imagine the invited Bishops having a civilised natter over tea and passing around a selection of Niblo's biscuits.

No, I suspect it was quite heated. Tradition even recounts St. Nicolas of Myra (of Santa Claus fame) being so infuriated with Arius that he punched him.

Having looked into matters, I do have some questions for you:

Where was Constantine's seat of power before he decided to be Emperor over all the controlled lands?

Prior to his ascension as emperor in the west he was an augusti after his father, and iirc, spent much time in Britain.

What was his full name, and did he ever adopt any names?

Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus.

What was the beliefs Constantine followed before he was introduced to Christianity?

Like any good Roman, he was a pagan. And there's probably sufficient reason to believe that he observed the imperial cult of Sol Invictus.

What was his battle with Emperor Maxentius about?

Securing control of the western portion of the Roman empire.

Where can one observe murals depicting the battle?

No clue.

Was there any other noticeable memorials depicting the event created?

Haven't the foggiest.

What kind of person was Constantine?

A shrewd politician who was capable of as much cruelty as any emperor before him.

What became of his wife Fausta and son Crispus?

He had them killed.

Where did he move his powerhouse to?

After defeating his co-emperor Licinius he moved the capital of the empire from Rome to Byzantium.

What effect did Christianity have on him?

I don't know, and the historic record isn't that clear as far as I know. To what degree his conversion was even sincere is a matter of continued debate; but his patronage of Christianity is undisputable.

How many Bishops did he invite to Nicea in 325

The traditional number is 318, but some historians suspect the number could have been anywhere from around 200 up to the traditional number; the vast majority coming from the eastern provinces, only a tiny handful from the west--as the Arian controversy was chiefly a problem in the east. Not even the aging Bishop of Rome was able to attend, but was represented by two presbyters.

What did Christian leaders think about his character?

I suspect that depends on who you asked. Regardless of his character the nearly overwhelming sentiment expressed was that Constantine's work to end the persecutions was a grand welcome, and that at least in this capacity God was at work through Constantine to give His people a chance to live in some small manner of peace. Some, such as the semi-Arian Eusebius of Caesarea (aka Eusebius Pamphili, the author of the History and the Vita) had nothing but the most glowing praises for the emperor--which is why I think Eusebius deserves to be taken with at least a small grain of salt in certain respects.

I'm sure we will be going over all the material presented before coming to any conclusions.
Where was Arian drawing his evidence from?

Arius. Arius apparently was disciple of Lucian of Antioch; Arius' chief fear was almost certain Sabellianism and so his response to hearing his bishop, Alexander, say the things he was saying made Arius uneasy, because it seemed to be too similar to Sabellianism to his ear. The most problematic issue was the use of the word homoousios, this word was one of the major controversies at Nicea precisely because Sabellians had used this word to state that Jesus, the Son, was merely a mask or face worn by the single hypostasis of God the Father; therefore denying any hypostatic distinction between Father and Son: Jesus was merely, as it were, God wearing an earthsuit. Sabellianism had been condemned since the beginning of the third century, c.f. Tertullian's Against Praxeas. And there were still Sabellians at the time of the Arian controversy, e.g. Marcellus of Ancyra. Arius, from his own perspective, was trying to defend the catholic Christian faith the same as his opponents; and thus worked from Scripture and the traditions of the Church--Arius' error wasn't in lacking Christian conviction, but in that attempting to protect the faith from one error (Sabellianism) he ended up teaching another error, that there were two entirely different Gods.

I imagine the people present at the Council were non Jews? If so, what would son of God mean to their culture and understanding?

There'd be no reason for a non-Christian to be present at the council. Whether or not any the bishops were converts from Judaism or the descendants of Jewish converts is ultimately irrelevant, but chances are there were. The term "Son of God" would have an already established meaning within Christian tradition and context.

Perhaps this is where Arian was getting his teachings from?

Arius.

No, because Arius believed Jesus was divine, that Jesus was God. Arius taught and believed that the Son/Logos was created at the beginning, he was the first thing created by the Father; the Father therefore brought the Son into existence at the beginning and that the Son and Logos was the God who created heaven and earth, the creative agent through which all things were made. The Arian bishop Wulfila (Latinized as Ulfilas), who translated Scripture into the Gothic language and was himself a convert from among the Goths gives us a definitive Arian confession of faith as recorded in the letter of Wulfila's pupil Auxentius:

"I, Wulfila, Bishop and Confessor, have always believed thus and in this sole and true faith I make my journey to my Lord, I believe that there is only one God the Father, alone unbegotten and invisible, and in His only-begotten Son, our Lord and God, creator and maker of all things, not having any like unto Him. Therefore there is one God of all, who is also God of our God, And I believe in one Holy Spirit, an enlightening and sanctifying power. As Christ says after the resurrection to his Apostles: "Behold I send the promise of my Father upon you; but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem until ye be clothed with power from on high." And again: "And ye shall receive power coming upon you by the Holy Spirit." Neither God nor Lord, but the faithful minister of Christ; not equal, but subject and obedient in all things to the Son. And I believe the Son to be subject and obedient in all things to God the Father." - Translation by Jim Marchand, available here

1 Cor 15:
3 For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, 5 and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. 6 Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. 7 Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. 8 Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me. 9 For I am the least of the apostles, unworthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.

3 - Where is this written in the scripture?
4 - " " "
5 - I thought Judas was killed, leaving 11?
8 - Where did Paul see Jesus pbuh?
9 - When was Paul made an Apostle?

- Christians have since the beginning understood certain texts, such as Isaiah 53, to be messianic in scope; that is not the interpretation taken up by the Jews but we should expect there to be discrepancy between Christian and Jewish readings of the same texts.

- It's not difficult to assume that Paul's use of "the twelve" is indicative of the group.

- The Acts of the Apostles records Paul's encounter with the risen Christ. And no, I don't believe the discrepancies mentioned in the versions of the account in the text are sufficient rationale to dismiss it.

- When Christ called the Apostle, again as recorded in the Acts of the Apostles, to suffer for His sake and to be an apostle to the nations.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
4,628
1,334
South
✟108,224.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
1 Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.



Early on when I started participating in this thread I tried to start a discussion on the personal experience of believers of the Christian faith and those of the Muslim faith. It is my opinion that is would more productive than a constant back and forth of presenting the opinions of so called scholars and so called experts in whatever field. All of that has its place but, it is not substitute for the personal experience one has had in their life. No one can present any scholarly work or opinion that will shake my faith in Christ. Just as my critique of the Quran will not change anyone’s mind, endless questioning of the validity of the Holy Bible will not shake the faith of one who has truly been touched by Christ. What has God done for you and what have you known God to do for others is what makes real and undeniable evidence.


I believe the question of this thread has absolutely been answered in resounding clarity “Are Allah and God of the Bible the same Person?” The answer is an unequivocal NO. The only way to make Islam and Christianity compatible is to undermine the very essence of Christianity and its belief system. I for one will never accept the work of any so called scholar over my own personal life experience. I have had miraculous healing in my body; I have had words of knowledge spoken to me with facts no man could have possibly known. I have known an individual born without eye balls in the socket who received a creative miracle which gave them new eyes and sight, my friends a false god does not do these things. A false god will not take a life trapped in drugs and alcohol and deliver them instantly from that bondage.


It matters not what you or I think is proper understanding in the natural of any of this, what have you experienced in your spirit and what has God done in your life and what you know to be true is what matters. No man or his words can ever take that away from you.




Acts 4:11 This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.

12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.

13 Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men, they marvelled; and they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus.

John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Muslim-UK

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2015
406
162
53
✟14,751.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
Early on when I started participating in this thread I tried to start a discussion on the personal experience of believers of the Christian faith and those of the Muslim faith. It is my opinion that is would more productive than a constant back and forth of presenting the opinions of so called scholars and so called experts in whatever field.
We exchanged personal accounts, and have established these things are subjective, and unverifiable.

I believe the question of this thread has absolutely been answered in resounding clarity “Are Allah and God of the Bible the same Person?” The answer is an unequivocal NO. The only way to make Islam and Christianity compatible is to undermine the very essence of Christianity and its belief system.
You used a fabricated verse 1 John 5:7 to show 3 in 1. You have failed to show to show me where Father, Son and Holy Ghost are 3 separate beings who together form ONE God. If this is what Jesus pbuh taught, then the Bible should be brimming with such verses.

Until then I will carry on worshipping the GOD of Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad, may the peace and blessings of ALLAH swt be upon them all.

It seems, you are adding to what Jesus pbuh taught and making things up to justify the teachings of the Church.

I for one will never accept the work of any so called scholar over my own personal life experience. I have had miraculous healing in my body; I have had words of knowledge spoken to me with facts no man could have possibly known. I have known an individual born without eye balls in the socket who received a creative miracle which gave them new eyes and sight, my friends a false god does not do these things. A false god will not take a life trapped in drugs and alcohol and deliver them instantly from that bondage.
The problem here is again unverifiable data, and personal accounts and all subjective. People claim to be filled with the Holy Spirit, giving them the ability to heal people, yet every time you tell them there are dozens of people in a Hospital, less than a few miles away, could they please go there and help innocent people experiencing unbearable pain and agony. Every single time, they make excuses and scuttle off.

In fact, why even go to a Hospital. There are hundreds of threads right here on this forum, asking for people to help them, go there and pray for them, and let us know how many you are able to help: Prayer Wall

Over a thousands threads here with people suffering depression, and other issues:
Christian Advice

I look forward to reading your input on the above forums and watching how the Spirit of God within you helps transform lives.


It matters not what you or I think is proper understanding in the natural of any of this, what have you experienced in your spirit and what has God done in your life and what you know to be true is what matters. No man or his words can ever take that away from you.

I agree as everyone has their personal experiences, and if this part of the board is set up to convince of other religions, their way is wrong, then it fails.

Acts 4:11 This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. 12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
Words written by Luke, the Disciple of Pharisee Saul, and neither man met Jesus.

John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
The 'Way', the 'Truth' and the 'Life' are all metaphors for Torah or being Torah observant:

I am the way. To his Disciples; the Old Testament Jew, the way was the Torah. The only way to God was through the law. Psalms 119:1 says, “Blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the LAW of the LORD.” Psalms 32:8 says, “I will instruct you and show you the way to go; with My eye on you, I will give counsel.” Jesus' followers were also very familiar with Exodus 18:20 ”And you shall teach them the statutes and the laws, and show them the way in which they must walk and the work they must do.” For the Jews, that way was the law and the prophets. In Jewish tradition, the way to find the path to God was to study the Torah.

I am the truth. To the Torah Jew, the truth was the Torah. Psalms 119:142 says, “Thy righteousness is an everlasting righteousness, and your law is truth.” Verse 151 says “You are near, Lord, and all Your commands are truth.” The Jews understood, that truth was the law and the prophets. Absolute truth could only be found in God and revealed in the Law and the Prophets. God was seen as the God of Truth, and the Torah was said to be His thoughts and the revelation of His purpose in the creation of the universe, thereby revealing absolute truth. All “truth” was to be compared against the Truth revealed in the Law and the prophets. The disciples had been taught from childhood that if something did not line up with the truth of scripture, then it was not true.

I am the life. To the Torah Jew, the life was the Torah. In Deuteronomy 30:11-20, Moses gives the Israelites a choice to make. They could choose life and prosperity, or they could choose death and adversity. If they chose life, they would have to walk in God's ways, and keep his Law, because God is their life. If they chose death, they were free to ignore God's ways and laws. Moses gave them this advice, choose life. For the Israelite, to follow the law was to choose life. The Torah was life. T he disciples had been taught this from childhood.

No one comes to the Father except through Me. To the Old Testament Jew, the only way to God was through the Law. The Law made it possible for the Israelites to approach God. The sacrifices and rituals allowed them to present themselves before God and to be accepted by him. Those who tried to approach God without following the Law usually ended up dead, (Nadab and Abihu in Leviticus 10). All Israelites knew that the only way to God was through the Law.

Four radical, clear cut statements from the lips of Jesus pbuh. Remember he was very clear about the Torah:

Sermon on the Mount; Matthew 5:
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. 19 Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

For Salvation, you have to follow the Prophet sent, as each Prophet before was the Way, Truth, Life and no one came to GOD except through them. All the Jews should have Followed Jesus, listened to him and obeyed his commandments.
 
Upvote 0

Mrs.PGL

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 12, 2015
439
271
windsor ontario
✟69,644.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Kill Christians?? Try and keep it civilised, as I could cite a work by 2 Evangelical pastors, who travelled the World to detail all the Christians killed around the world since 33AD, and they put the blame for at least 5.5 Million of those deaths firmly at the feet of fellow 'Christians' and many of the methods used make Isis and others look like nice people.

There are Tens of Millions of Christians living in Muslim Countries, and have done so for 14 Centuries. Here's some facts both from within the Bible and sources kept out of it showing there was no blood death on the cross or tree as recorded by Paul:

Jesus pbuh had the ability to change his appearance and travel instantly between places. From the NT he appeared to be a gardener to Mary and then travelled with 2 companions that didn't recognise his voice or physical appearance, Luke 24:13-16. He was able to appear to his disciples who were in a locked room John 20:19. Gospel of Mark 15 says, a man called Jesus Barabbas (Son of God) was set free and Simon carried the cross. Could you read trough Mark 15 KJV and let me know when Simon gave the cross to Jesus?

Paul writes before the 4 Gospels and tries really hard to convince people that Jesus pbuh had died and resurrected. This from the NT:

1 Cor 15:12 Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13 But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. 14 And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. 15 We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised. 16 For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised. 17 And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins.

Clearly there were many people who didn't believe their Messiah had been killed.

Jesus pbuh himself prayed all night to be saved:
luke 22:44 And having been in agony, He was praying more earnestly. And His sweat became like great drops of blood falling down upon the ground. <<<praying to be saved

John 11:41-42 shows his prayers were ALWAYS heard. No wonder of course, as his name means, 'God Saves'.

6 disciples outside of the NT write to say another whose name was Simon was crucified in error by the enemies of Jesus pbuh.

"Come therefore, let us go on with the completion of the will of the incorruptible Father. For behold, those who will bring them judgment are coming, and they will put them to shame. But me they cannot touch. And you, O Peter, shall stand in their midst. Do not be afraid because of your cowardice. Their minds shall be closed, for the invisible one has opposed them."

When he had said those things, I saw him seemingly being seized by them. And I said "What do I see, O Lord? That it is you yourself whom they take, and that you are grasping me? Or who is this one, glad and laughing on the tree? And is it another one whose feet and hands they are striking?"

The Savior said to me, "He whom you saw on the tree, glad and laughing, this is the living Jesus. But this one into whose hands and feet they drive the nails is his fleshly part, which is the substitute being put to shame, the one who came into being in his likeness. But look at him and me."

But I, when I had looked, said "Lord, no one is looking at you. Let us flee this place."

But he said to me, "I have told you, 'Leave the blind alone!'. And you, see how they do not know what they are saying. For the son of their glory instead of my servant, they have put to shame."

And I saw someone about to approach us resembling him, even him who was laughing on the tree. And he was <filled> with a Holy Spirit, and he is the Savior. And there was a great, ineffable light around them, and the multitude of ineffable and invisible angels blessing them. And when I looked at him, the one who gives praise was revealed.

The Apocalypse of Peter -- The Nag Hammadi Library 80-100 AD
Early Christian Writings: New Testament, Apocrypha, Gnostics, Church Fathers

Many early Christian sects did not believe Jesus was crucified. Jesus laughed with joy:

Wherefore he did not himself suffer death, but Simon, a certain man of Cyrene, being compelled, bore the cross in his stead; so that this latter being transfigured by him, that he might be thought to be Jesus, was crucified, through ignorance and error, while Jesus himself received the form of Simon, and, standing by, laughed at them. For since he was an incorporeal power, and the Nous (mind) of the unborn father, he transfigured himself as he pleased, and thus ascended to him who had sent him, deriding them, inasmuch as he could not be laid hold of, and was invisible to all. Those, then, who know these things have been freed from the principalities who formed the world; so that it is not incumbent on us to confess him who was crucified, but him who came in the form of a man, and was thought to be crucified, and was called Jesus, and was sent by the Father.

(The Church Father Iranaeus, Against Heresies, Chapter XXIV.-Doctrines of Saturninus and Basilides) <<< Basilides was an early Gnostic religious teacher in Alexandria, Egypt who taught from 117 to 138 AD, and claimed to have inherited his teachings from Matthew.

Notice how Iranaeus says “through ignorance and error” the Jews misapprehended, and crucified the wrong person. Amazingly, the Holy Qur'an harmonises this account, stating that they follow error, conjecture, and ignorance:

That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not: (Al-Quran 4:157)

The 1945 discovery of Gnostic texts at Nag Hammadi, Egypt unearthed a book called The Second Treatise of the Great Seth, 55-56 AD where Jesus states:

I did not succumb to them as they had planned. But I was not afflicted at all. Those who were there punished me. And I did not die in reality but in appearance, lest I be put to shame by them because these are my kinsfolk. I removed the shame from me and I did not become fainthearted in the face of what happened to me at their hands. I was about to succumb to fear, and I suffered according to their sight and thought, in order that they may never find any word to speak about them. For my death, which they think happened, (happened) to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death. For their Ennoias did not see me, for they were deaf and blind. But in doing these things, they condemn themselves. Yes, they saw me; they punished me. It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I. They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. It was another upon Whom they placed the crown of thorns. But I was rejoicing in the height over all the wealth of the archons and the offspring of their error, of their empty glory. And I was laughing at their ignorance. (The Treatise of the Great Seth)

“There are also several historical sources other than the Bible and the Qur'an which confirm that many of the early Christians did not believe that Jesus died on the cross...The Cerinthians and later the Basilidians, for example, who were among the first of the early Christian communities, denied that Jesus was crucified...The Carpocratians, another early Christian sect, believed that it was not Jesus who was crucified, but another in his place”.
(Jesus Prophet of Islam, Muhammad Ataur-Raheem, Ahmed Thompson, 1996 (revised edition. p47)

“… Plotinus, who lived in the fourth century, tells us that he had read a book called The Journies of the Apostles which related the acts of Peter, John, Andrew, Barnabas, Thomas and Paul. Among other things, it stated that Jesus was not crucified, but another in his place, and therefore, he laughed at those who believed that they had crucified him”.
(ibid, Jesus Prophet of Islam, 1991 edition. P. 37) acts of john 97-101 AD

Throw into the mix the facts, you don't have the originals, widespread editing from Scribes and Church Fathers, fabricated letters and epistles, disagreement between John and the Synoptics about what was said at the trial, where the trial was, the day and time of the crucifixion, and events surrounding the empty tomb, and it is plain to see you can not be sure of anything, and go by blind faith alone.

The good news is using free will, you can believe what you like. When board member ViaCrucis responds, I shall hopefully be sharing what I've uncovered about Constantine, the 4th Century Emperor of the Romans. It's around this time that Church doctrine is finalised and lots of manuscripts start appearing.
Sorry, Islam is currently persecuting Christians all over the world - taking children out of schools, raping them and forcibly impregnating them, so that makes you comment to start moot.
Your lack of knowledge of Christianity insults you.
lol...Your quote of 1 Corinthians...,.Paul was teaching unbelievers and believers. He was building a church.
You also show a lack of understanding on what it means to be saved. Salvation comes when one renounces their sin, accepts Jesus call, and asks Him to be their Lord and Saviour. They are accepted into the family of God to receive blessings while here and will eventually end up in Heaven.
Jesus came to die for people's sins - like you.
luke 22:44 And having been in agony, He was praying more earnestly. And His sweat became like great drops of blood falling down upon the ground."The man in him was obviously afraid - he sweated blood - God in Him, continued on the course to death. That is a different "saved" than salvation.
You are citing extra Biblical material, and one cannot trust the truth of it, and you seem to depend on that a lot. Those comments are disregarded. Gnosticism is not Christianity. If you want to try to understand Christianity, go to the source - the Bible.
Also, you didn't answer my question. Do you want to kill Christians? You appear to have tried to defend that using the Bible of all silliness. Is that what you are saying - that you want to be a murderer? God does not want His people murdered. That is a prime example of how you do not worship God, but an idol.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Muslim-UK

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2015
406
162
53
✟14,751.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
Sorry, Islam is currently persecuting Christians all over the world - taking children out of schools, raping them and forcibly impregnating them, so that makes you comment to start moot.

Getting your information from blog sites and fox news by any chance?

Your lack of knowledge of Christianity insults you.
lol...Your quote of 1 Corinthians...,.Paul was teaching unbelievers and believers. He was building a church.

Lack of Bible study, ref Moses and the 3,000 Israelites. Paul's Gospel was also rejected by people who knew better.

You also show a lack of understanding on what it means to be saved. Salvation comes when one renounces their sin, accepts Jesus call, and asks Him to be their Lord and Saviour. They are accepted into the family of God to receive blessings while here and will eventually end up in Heaven.
Jesus came to die for people's sins - like you.

No one called Jesus son of Mary died as I showed. You choosing to ignore these Gospels as Gospel texts is amusing given that the Gospel of John was one of the most popular texts amongst the Gnostic sects, along with the Apocalypse of Peter, which showed Jesus pbuh had his tears of blood answered.

Gnosticism is not Christianity. If you want to try to understand Christianity, go to the source - the Bible.
Also, you didn't answer my question. Do you want to kill Christians? You appear to have tried to defend that using the Bible of all silliness. Is that what you are saying - that you want to be a murderer? God does not want His people murdered. That is a prime example of how you do not worship God, but an idol.

The source Bible only goes back to the 4th Century.
No Muslims do not want to kill Christians. We are 1.6 Billion in number and the vast majority of us live with Christians. Islam is the number one religion Christians will turn to when they can't get answers from their local church. 100,000 Islam converts living in UK: White women most keen to embrace Muslim faith | Daily Mail Online
 
Upvote 0