Yes, because treating men and women as equals is such an outlandish notion, even a kindergartner could instantly see right through it. Right? Right?Nobody has really proven why feminist ideology should be taken seriously in the first place.
Nobody has really proven why feminist ideology should be taken seriously in the first place.
Nobody has really proven why feminist ideology should be taken seriously in the first place.
I mean, I see women as equals to men. Pretty crazy stuff, huh?
Nobody has really proven why feminist ideology should be taken seriously in the first place.
Agreed. Sadly a lot of people who use the feminist label shouldn't be taken seriously.I would say it depends on which ideology we're talking about. The radical stuff I'd say belongs in the garbage bin, but the idea that men and women should have equal rights and equal opportunity is valid and should be taken seriously.
Thank you, LoveBeingAMuslimah.
I am not familiar enough with the Koran to find those beautiful, and I believe representative, verses. I loved reading them, and am recording them for future reference.
This year I have read the Book of Mormon again, using 4 colors to highlight 4 particular qualities that I wish to develop. One was humility/submission. It is a dominant theme throughout that holy book. Jus a few years ago I found out what Islam and Muslim mean. That discovery opened my eyes to the deep congruence of the great world religions. Suddenly I saw submission as a dominant theme in the Tao te Ching, the Teachings of Buddha, the Bhagavad Gita, certainly the Quran and the Bible.
Thanks for your contribution here.
Define "equal"
Balance?
If there is only one of something it cannot be equal to anything else
but
1+1 is equal to 2,
They two shall become one,
back to one again.
Example of what I,m thinking,
If there was only one tree on the whole planet,
it could not be said it was equal or unequal to any other tree because it is the only tree.
But if there were two trees, it could be said that this one is better or that one is better,
by making the two one, you see only one tree.
Define "equal"
(Emphasis mine)I don't know about US law, but less than twenty years ago, rape was defined as "extra-marital" in my country.
Less than forty years ago, married women could only go to work with a written permission of their husband.
Up until 1959, husbands could immediately terminate their wives' working contract. In Bavaria, female teachers had to quit as soon as they got married. Furthermore, husbands had total dominion over every decision, and any wages earned by their wives were to be used by the men as they saw fit, without the women having any legal say in the matter.
None of this would have changed without feminism. Even the most detrimental norms do not change on their own unless someone makes an active effort to draw attention to them.
However, none of these excesses ever existed in Utah. The laws there were established in the 1800s by a people who had chosen prophets, seers and revelators to be their governors - and that religious influence promoted equity, family, and prosperity without force, long before "Feminism" was a gleam in a lecher's eye.
Oh, come on! As I show at http://LiberalsLikeChrist.Org/PaulvsAll.html in his own words, Paul fo Tarsus thought he was superior to everybody but God Almighty! And throughout the centuries, it's Paul who has fed the mean conservative streak in "Christianity" that has promoted misogyny, slavery, contempt for gays and for the downtrodden, and support for tyrany.Surprisingly, Paul was quite egalitarian for his time.
That is a very fruitful question.Soooo why aren't women allowed to be members of the Priesthood?