OSAS vs NOSAS

Status
Not open for further replies.

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,349
Winnipeg
✟236,538.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I sense you might have thought this is the view I take, so I want to offer clarification. I consider instead that salvation can only be lost, by proving unfit for The Kingdom. I believe this because it is the core of the gospel: The wages of sin is death, and this is why Jesus' death was unjust and the most grievous sin. Therefore, as in Genesis 4:7, by proving the master of sin, one will be accepted.

I'm afraid I don't follow what you are saying here. Every person who has ever been saved was unfit for God's kingdom. That is the very reason they needed saving. And when a person is born-again, they are placed in Christ and thereby justified by God. This means they are accepted by God solely on the basis of their position in Christ, not by any work (good or bad) that they do. In light of this, I don't understand how believers can prove themselves unfit for God's kingdom. Christ was perfectly "fit" on their behalf and this never ceases to be the case.

Genesis 4:7 does not mean, I think, what you seem to believe it means.

Genesis 4:3-7
3 And in the process of time it came to pass that Cain brought an offering of the fruit of the ground to the Lord.
4 Abel also brought of the firstborn of his flock and of their fat. And the Lord respected Abel and his offering,
5 but He did not respect Cain and his offering. And Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell.
6 So the Lord said to Cain, "Why are you angry? And why has your countenance fallen?
7 If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin lies at the door. And its desire is for you, but you should rule over it."


The phrase "sin crouches at the door" is a reference, not to Sin, but to a sin-offering (Ho. 4:8; 2Cor. 5:21; Heb. 9:28). In Hebrew: ‏לפתח חטאת רבץ‎ - lappethach chattath robets - literally: a sin-offering lies at your door. God is saying to Cain that although his offering is unacceptable, there is another, better offering available to him. As well, the statement, "...its desire is for you, but you should rule over it," is not a reference to Sin, but to Cain's younger brother Abel. Really, the end of verse 7 should read, "And his desire is for you, but you should rule over him." This is a confirmation of Cain's primogeniture, meant to ease his anger toward his younger brother.

Therefore, as in Genesis 4:7, by proving the master of sin, one will be accepted.

Ephesians 1:4-7
4 just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love,
5 having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will,
6 to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He has made us accepted in the Beloved.
7 In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace


Paul says pretty clearly here that we are "accepted in the Beloved" who is Christ. And that acceptance is the consequence of placing saving faith in Him as one's Saviour.

Mastering sin has nothing to do with confessing one's belief that Jesus has forgiven their sin, because someone could be lying about their repentance (knowing they have not confessed and repented, and that because they prefer to sin, they do not have fellowship with Him). Those people do not listen to His voice and follow Him. They are not His sheep, because they follow another master.

Yes, there will be many who will say to God on Judgement Day, "Lord, Lord..." (Matt. 7:22, 23) But here's the thing: No one can master sin. Certainly, with the help of the Holy Spirit, we can live such that sin becomes the the exception rather than the norm, but is that mastery? I don't think so... Only one ever mastered sin: the God-man, Jesus Christ. And his perfect righteousness is forensically imputed to us by faith in him as our Saviour and Lord. Through Jesus we are justified - made just as if we had never sinned - and God looks upon each of us through the lens of this fact. What need, then, to fear a lack of mastery of sin? The struggling believer who despairs of their sin, whose moral failures tempt them to fear for their divine adoption, can boldly come to the throne of God's grace and find mercy and grace - not rejection or condemnation - to help in time of need. (Heb. 4:15, 16)
Selah.
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I'm afraid I don't follow what you are saying here.
Then The Lord might not be speaking to you in it, it will be safe to ignore.

I will say though, do not ignore the truth in this:

Anyone who preaches salvation and forgiveness in Jesus' name without need for effective, enduring lifetime of repentance is taking their eternal life into their own hands. Many people do this, since it is a common teaching and misinterpretation of Ephesians 2:8, that enables people who refuse to repent, to deceive themselves with a perversion of the authentic Christian gospel. Because I know first-hand that Christians do not always practice repentance when they should, and when that happens they are walking in darkness, if they then are forced to commit blasphemy by claiming they have fellowship with Him, their heart is hardened and their self-deception becomes their reality.

Jesus said "If someone causes one of these little ones who trusts in me to stumble, it will be better for a millstone to be tied around their neck and cast into the sea.", and "whoever is not working for me is actually working against me". St Paul stated his disapproval bys saying "if anyone should preach a gospel other than what we have preached, let him be accursed". That gospel is stated in many different ways, but none so clearly relevant to righting the misleading doctrines in this thread, as Hebrews 10:26-27.
Every person who has ever been saved was unfit for God's kingdom.
What makes you say this? I am not saying that it is wrong, only that salvation from sin is the act of redeeming sinners. Remember what Jesus said, as I quoted above: "whoever produces fruit is pruned to produce more, but whoever does not produce fruit is cut off. So, remain in me". - Do you have any experience with pruining? I do. I was an apple orchardist for about five years. So this analogy really speaks to me in a way maybe it is lost on less horticultural people. I noticed myself, just last week, He pruned me so hard I was almost cut off! That is truly terrifying aiki! Though, if a hard prune is done carefully to not stunt the tree, it will produce vigour.
That is the very reason they needed saving.
Jesus said "the healthy do not need a doctor" - have you considered how that fits your view of the gospel?
And when a person is born-again, they are placed in Christ and thereby justified by God.
Yes! I feel justified by God today and yesterday, bit I could not have said that honestly only a short a while ago (ashamed to admit). I am speaking here today an understanding I have, which is based on real experience, and is consistent with what those of faith have written in the bible of their own understandings. This is why I look at other people's view of the gospel which clearly do not appear based on experience, but on some teaching they have accepted, that when they die they will be ok. Well, I have that assurance right now, from The Lord Jesus Christ. But I didn't have it just a while ago even though I have been reborn. Those who cannot so boldly claim that assurance are clear to see. Though we know that it is God who gives the increase, while we are only called to sow and water.
This means they are accepted by God solely on the basis of their position in Christ, not by any work (good or bad) that they do.
There is a contradiction in this statement. The fact that they are in Christ is because they do the will of The Father in heaven (Matthew 7:21, John 10:27).
In light of this, I don't understand how believers can prove themselves unfit for God's kingdom.
Faith without works is dead. I see many believers whose faith is dead, and I expect that all those who are alive in Christ can see it too.
Christ was perfectly "fit" on their behalf and this never ceases to be the case.
Ooh, will you please provide the scripture that you base this understanding on? It sounds like Penal Substitutionary Atonement, and I am still searching for evidence of that doctrine's truth. Maybe you will have it for me! Thanks :)
Genesis 4:7 does not mean, I think, what you seem to believe it means.

Genesis 4:3-7
3 And in the process of time it came to pass that Cain brought an offering of the fruit of the ground to the Lord.
4 Abel also brought of the firstborn of his flock and of their fat. And the Lord respected Abel and his offering,
5 but He did not respect Cain and his offering. And Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell.
6 So the Lord said to Cain, "Why are you angry? And why has your countenance fallen?
7 If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin lies at the door. And its desire is for you, but you should rule over it."


The phrase "sin crouches at the door" is a reference, not to Sin, but to a sin-offering (Ho. 4:8; 2Cor. 5:21; Heb. 9:28). In Hebrew: ‏לפתח חטאת רבץ‎ - lappethach chattath robets - literally: a sin-offering lies at your door. God is saying to Cain that although his offering is unacceptable, there is another, better offering available to him. As well, the statement, "...its desire is for you, but you should rule over it," is not a reference to Sin, but to Cain's younger brother Abel. Really, the end of verse 7 should read, "And his desire is for you, but you should rule over him." This is a confirmation of Cain's primogeniture, meant to ease his anger toward his younger brother.
This will be an interesting turn, if it is a reliable claim. Can you please explain why your translation has produced different words from other translations, and do you know of a translation that does use "sin-offering" instead of "sin" and "him" instead of "it"?
Ephesians 1:4-7
4 just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love,
5 having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will,
6 to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He has made us accepted in the Beloved.
7 In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace


Paul says pretty clearly here that we are "accepted in the Beloved" who is Christ. And that acceptance is the consequence of placing saving faith in Him as one's Saviour.
IF one is accepted, it is because The Lord does not have anything against them. Again, as I explain from experience, when we refuse to repent, and instead we are walking in darkness, we cannot claim to have fellowship with Him. It is this lifestyle as was explained in Hebrews 10:26-27, that if we go on deliberately sinning after we have the knowledge of the truth, there is no longer any forgiveness for sin, but only a fearful expectation of judgement. This is said, not in context of repentance being a one-off decision as some people preach, but that every time we become aware of a sinful tendency, we are to do the right thing: repent. That is, we must choose to not act sinfully, expecting Him to grieve, but rather we should put to death the desires of the flesh. If we don't, and this is what I know from experience, there is no more forgiveness, but only a fearful expectation of judgement. However, if we confess our sins (that is, to accept we are doing sin instead of trying to justify our sin), He is faithful and just to forgive us our sin AND to cleanse us from unrighteousness.

Redemption from sin isn't a theory about an afterlife without Satan, it is a real work of the renewal of one's heart, the growth that produces fruit of holiness, and it is for us to have here and now.
Yes, there will be many who will say to God on Judgement Day, "Lord, Lord..." (Matt. 7:22, 23) But here's the thing: No one can master sin. Certainly, with the help of the Holy Spirit, we can live such that sin becomes the the exception rather than the norm, but is that mastery? I don't think so... Only one ever mastered sin: the God-man, Jesus Christ. And his perfect righteousness is forensically imputed to us by faith in him as our Saviour and Lord. Through Jesus we are justified - made just as if we had never sinned - and God looks upon each of us through the lens of this fact. What need, then, to fear a lack of mastery of sin?
You speak as though you have no power over your own sin. That is not supported by the gospel, for there is power in His blood. Think of this next time you partake of it: His body was given, but not so that He would be gone from the earth; rather so that we would become His body in all the earth, and His blood was given for the remission of sin. Therefore, do not let sin be your master, but if you fall, claim His blood to cover your sin and stand again. Proverbs 24:16.
The struggling believer who despairs of their sin, whose moral failures tempt them to fear for their divine adoption, can boldly come to the throne of God's grace and find mercy and grace - not rejection or condemnation - to help in time of need. (Heb. 4:15, 16)
Selah.
Amen. To anyone who feels this way, say: "if you will hear His call today, do not harden your heart". I fear, if a person will harden their heart, they may not allow their self to hear Him again.
 
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,349
Winnipeg
✟236,538.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Then The Lord might not be speaking to you in it, it will be safe to ignore.

Well, if it is God's truth, He will be speaking it to me as He does with all of His truth.

Anyone who preaches salvation and forgiveness in Jesus' name without need for effective, enduring lifetime of repentance is taking their eternal life into their own hands. Many people do this, since it is a common teaching and misinterpretation of Ephesians 2:8, that enables people who refuse to repent, to deceive themselves with a perversion of the authentic Christian gospel. Because I know first-hand that Christians do not always practice repentance when they should, and when that happens they are walking in darkness, if they then are forced to commit blasphemy by claiming they have fellowship with Him, their heart is hardened and their self-deception becomes their reality.

I don't think I have ever espoused the view that one can be a child of God and live like the devil. In fact, in many of my posts to fellow believers I have urged them to repentance and a right walk with God. I don't, though, think that the presence of sin in a believer's life is grounds for them to begin to fear for their salvation. The reality is that not one believer has ever achieved a sinless life. As well, we are often totally blind to our sin. It may take years for God to illuminate to us those very deepest, darkest corners of our lives where sin exists. And yet, God continues to love us and gently and patiently move us farther in and higher up with Him. If the mere presence of sin, then, is grounds for fearing for one's salvation, then every single believer ought to live in terror; for there is not a single child of God who is utterly without sin at any time!

As terrible as it is to encourage a believer to be easy with sin, it is equally terrible to encourage them toward the fear and hypocrisy of legalism.

I wrote: "Every person who has ever been saved was unfit for God's kingdom."

To which you responded: "What makes you say this? I am not saying that it is wrong, only that salvation from sin is the act of redeeming sinners."

Romans 3:23
23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,

I noticed myself, just last week, He pruned me so hard I was almost cut off! That is truly terrifying aiki!

I am saddened to hear you living in such unnecessary terror.

Jesus said "the healthy do not need a doctor" - have you considered how that fits your view of the gospel?

I don't have "my view" of the Gospel, only the Bible's view. What makes you think I haven't considered Jesus' words concerning who needs a physician and who doesn't?

Yes! I feel justified by God today and yesterday, bit I could not have said that honestly only a short a while ago (ashamed to admit). I am speaking here today an understanding I have, which is based on real experience, and is consistent with what those of faith have written in the bible of their own understandings. This is why I look at other people's view of the gospel which clearly do not appear based on experience, but on some teaching they have accepted, that when they die they will be ok. Well, I have that assurance right now, from The Lord Jesus Christ. But I didn't have it just a while ago even though I have been reborn. Those who cannot so boldly claim that assurance are clear to see. Though we know that it is God who gives the increase, while we are only called to sow and water.

But what you're saying here sounds very much like your experience, what you feel, is the final arbiter of what is true in your relationship with God. What happens, then, if your experience or feelings diverge from the teaching of Scripture? How do you "walk by faith, not by sight" if your experience and feelings dictate to you what is true in your relationship with God?

A believer's justification is not contingent upon what they may feel or experience but rests upon the unchanging and unchangeable declaration of God's Word.

I wrote: "This means they are accepted by God solely on the basis of their position in Christ, not by any work (good or bad) that they do."

You responded: There is a contradiction in this statement. The fact that they are in Christ is because they do the will of The Father in heaven (Matthew 7:21, John 10:27).

No, there is no contradiction, just a misunderstanding of the order of things. The fact that one is in Christ is evidenced by corresponding good deeds. But the good deeds arise out of salvation, they do not obtain it. To believe otherwise is to directly contradict the explicit declaration of Scripture:

Ephesians 2:8-9
8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,
9 not of works, lest anyone should boast.


Faith without works is dead. I see many believers whose faith is dead, and I expect that all those who are alive in Christ can see it too.

Now here is a real contradiction! True heart-belief always results in a corresponding action. That is the message of James chapter 2. So, if someone claims to believe in Christ as their Saviour and Lord and does not bear out that claim in how they live, they have contradicted themselves!

Ooh, will you please provide the scripture that you base this understanding on? It sounds like Penal Substitutionary Atonement, and I am still searching for evidence of that doctrine's truth. Maybe you will have it for me! Thanks :)

Are you not aware that many of the Early Church fathers held to the view of Penal Substitutionary Atonement? Have you not read Romans 1:18 - 3:20?

This will be an interesting turn, if it is a reliable claim. Can you please explain why your translation has produced different words from other translations, and do you know of a translation that does use "sin-offering" instead of "sin" and "him" instead of "it"?

Young's Literal Translation renders Genesis 4:7 as:

7 Is there not, if thou dost well, acceptance? and if thou dost not well, at the opening a sin-offering is crouching...

The King James Version renders the end of Genesis 4:7:

7 ...And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.

The Darby Translation, the 1599 Geneva Bible, and the word-by-word translation of the Jubilee Bible also parallel the KJV. I realize the view I've shared with you is not the common one, and I would not defend it dogmatically, but it does accord very well with the immediate context of Genesis 4:7.

IF one is accepted, it is because The Lord does not have anything against them. Again, as I explain from experience, when we refuse to repent, and instead we are walking in darkness, we cannot claim to have fellowship with Him.

I'm afraid I cannot give your experience greater weight than Scripture, which is very clear on this point. One is accepted by God because they are "in the beloved" who is Christ. And one is in Christ solely by faith in him as one's Saviour and submission to him as one's Lord. If one is "walking in darkness," that is, the fundamental character of one's living is in contradiction to the commands and principles of Scripture, and one lives this way without compunction, then it is clear, not that one has lost one's salvation, but that one was never really saved!

You speak as though you have no power over your own sin.

If this is what you think, you've badly misunderstood my view. In fact, I believe quite the opposite! Read the first eighteen or so verses of Romans 6 & 8 and you'll see what I believe on this point. :)

God bless, brother!

Aiki.
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I don't, though, think that the presence of sin in a believer's life is grounds for them to begin to fear for their salvation.
Nor do I, but rather, look carefully at the language used in scripture: "practice", not "presence".
The reality is that not one believer has ever achieved a sinless life. As well, we are often totally blind to our sin. It may take years for God to illuminate to us those very deepest, darkest corners of our lives where sin exists. And yet, God continues to love us and gently and patiently move us farther in and higher up with Him. If the mere presence of sin, then, is grounds for fearing for one's salvation, then every single believer ought to live in terror; for there is not a single child of God who is utterly without sin at any time!

As terrible as it is to encourage a believer to be easy with sin, it is equally terrible to encourage them toward the fear and hypocrisy of legalism.
Indeed! So view Romans 9:30-32. Legalism is not the gospel, but by doing the right thing according to what we know by faith, one is accepted.

I am saddened to hear you living in such unnecessary terror.
It was not unnecessary though, I know He had to make that cut, and I knew it for quite some time. But the terror you speak of is a false impression. It was only terrifying while I realised I was not abiding in Him. I was not speaking in the power of The Holy Spirit, I was scrambling for words and understanding and talking like someone who was lost. Tell me aiki, if He did that to you, wouldn't you be terrified?
I don't have "my view" of the Gospel, only the Bible's view.
I do not wish to argue about it. I use that phrase because we all have our own understanding that is limited based on having learned over exposure over varying times to events that are unique to us. Though He remains the same and consistent, yet as you know, so many people express different views of the gospel, all claiming to be consistent with the bible. I did not mean to offend you, so please look elsewhere for the origin of that offense.
What makes you think I haven't considered Jesus' words concerning who needs a physician and who doesn't?
Excellent question. I think it is because I was emphasising the point of the gospel: it is to redeem the world from sin, and stemming from the central premise of the gospel: the wages of sin is death. Therefore, if someone does not sin, they do not need to be forgiven. Yet this is all distracting. The point is, a very dangerous perversion of the gospel is prevalent: "It is ok to sin because Jesus paid for your sin. So relax and enjoy life, it is a free gift". But the gospel actually isn't that, it is rather: leave your life of sin, and come, follow me. I do accept that I should have not said that to you, and I regret it a lot now that I have seen the type of response I have formed in you.
But what you're saying here sounds very much like your experience, what you feel, is the final arbiter of what is true in your relationship with God. What happens, then, if your experience or feelings diverge from the teaching of Scripture? How do you "walk by faith, not by sight" if your experience and feelings dictate to you what is true in your relationship with God?
You said: "your experience, what you feel" whereas I say "my closeness to Him, comfort of conscience" - I think perhaps the words I used might have not conveyed the reality that indeed, I am expressing the walk of faith with Him, and whether I am truly obeying Him is what makes me feel comfortable to state that I have fellowship with Him. Yes, unburdened conscience aiki, I think it does fit with your use of the word "feeling", but it also fits with my use of the phrase "walk by faith". I mean, we all know when there is sin on our conscience, don't we? I do. I expect therefore that others do too.
A believer's justification is not contingent upon what they may feel or experience but rests upon the unchanging and unchangeable declaration of God's Word.
Indeed, but you do know don't you, many people study the bible yet The Word does not declare to them that they have been accepted.
I wrote: "This means they are accepted by God solely on the basis of their position in Christ, not by any work (good or bad) that they do."

You responded: There is a contradiction in this statement. The fact that they are in Christ is because they do the will of The Father in heaven (Matthew 7:21, John 10:27).

No, there is no contradiction, just a misunderstanding of the order of things. The fact that one is in Christ is evidenced by corresponding good deeds. But the good deeds arise out of salvation, they do not obtain it. To believe otherwise is to directly contradict the explicit declaration of Scripture:

Ephesians 2:8-9
8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,
9 not of works, lest anyone should boast.
Yet, Jesus states: those who love to do evil do not go near the light for fear their deeds will be exposed. But those who do what is right come into the light so that all can see they are doing what is right, in the sight of God".

What do you reckon is the reason you and I are not in agreement right now?
Now here is a real contradiction! True heart-belief always results in a corresponding action. That is the message of James chapter 2. So, if someone claims to believe in Christ as their Saviour and Lord and does not bear out that claim in how they live, they have contradicted themselves!

Are you not aware that many of the Early Church fathers held to the view of Penal Substitutionary Atonement? Have you not read Romans 1:18 - 3:20?
I was not aware of that. Can you please provide references for this belief (re: early chucrch fathers, who were they and what did they say to this effect)? I have read that passage in Romans, and I have read it again just now. None of it seems to indicate that Penal Substitutionary Atonement is a doctrine of truth. I do have a thread that is dedicated to the investigation of the validity of Substitutionary Atonement doctrine, if you would be willing to contribute some effort in it's defense that would be the best place. It is listed under General Theology / Covenant Theology, and I can give you the link if you would like to help.
Young's Literal Translation renders Genesis 4:7 as:

7 Is there not, if thou dost well, acceptance? and if thou dost not well, at the opening a sin-offering is crouching...

The King James Version renders the end of Genesis 4:7:

7 ...And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.

The Darby Translation, the 1599 Geneva Bible, and the word-by-word translation of the Jubilee Bible also parallel the KJV. I realize the view I've shared with you is not the common one, and I would not defend it dogmatically, but it does accord very well with the immediate context of Genesis 4:7.

I'm afraid I cannot give your experience greater weight than Scripture, which is very clear on this point. One is accepted by God because they are "in the beloved" who is Christ. And one is in Christ solely by faith in him as one's Saviour and submission to him as one's Lord. If one is "walking in darkness," that is, the fundamental character of one's living is in contradiction to the commands and principles of Scripture, and one lives this way without compunction, then it is clear, not that one has lost one's salvation, but that one was never really saved!
Indeed. Will you say those are they described in Romans 9:22? Doesn't it break your heart?
If this is what you think, you've badly misunderstood my view. In fact, I believe quite the opposite! Read the first eighteen or so verses of Romans 6 & 8 and you'll see what I believe on this point. :)

God bless, brother!

Aiki.
Thank you. Please do try to figure out why we are not agreeing fully. It seems to me like it could be a combination of misunderstanding and personal dedication to fundamentally opposed doctrine.[/QUOTE]
 
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,349
Winnipeg
✟236,538.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I was not speaking in the power of The Holy Spirit, I was scrambling for words and understanding and talking like someone who was lost. Tell me aiki, if He did that to you, wouldn't you be terrified?

I can't say as I quite understand what you're describing. In any case, it doesn't sound pleasant.

I use that phrase because we all have our own understanding that is limited based on having learned over exposure over varying times to events that are unique to us. Though He remains the same and consistent, yet as you know, so many people express different views of the gospel, all claiming to be consistent with the bible. I did not mean to offend you, so please look elsewhere for the origin of that offense.

I wasn't offended. I just thought it was important to clarify that my view is derived from Scripture. Yes, there are many views of the Gospel, but they are not all equal in how well they accord with God's Word. Some very clearly contort it, others do so more subtly. And some very few actually accurately represent the Gospel as it is. I believe my view does that and until it can be clearly shown that I am mistaken, I am confident in saying that my understanding of the Gospel is biblical.

The point is, a very dangerous perversion of the gospel is prevalent: "It is ok to sin because Jesus paid for your sin. So relax and enjoy life, it is a free gift". But the gospel actually isn't that, it is rather: leave your life of sin, and come, follow me. I do accept that I should have not said that to you, and I regret it a lot now that I have seen the type of response I have formed in you.

I have never actually encountered anyone who taught or even believed this "dangerous perversion of the gospel" that you say is prevalent.

Yet, Jesus states: those who love to do evil do not go near the light for fear their deeds will be exposed. But those who do what is right come into the light so that all can see they are doing what is right, in the sight of God".

What do you reckon is the reason you and I are not in agreement right now?

Well, you seem to think that good works are part of being saved and I don't. As I said, before we are saved we are like those described in John 3:19, 20, but after we are saved, we are like those described in the very next verse. Good deeds are the product of being in the light and give evidence that this is so. But good deeds cannot be the means of our salvation because before we are saved we are evil and hiding from the light. It is only as God works in us making it possible to respond positively to the Gospel that we are able to confess our sins, accept Christ as our Saviour and Lord, and repent of a life lived apart from him. And when God has saved us, then it is that we can bring forth the good works that are the natural consequence of our salvation.

I was not aware of that. Can you please provide references for this belief (re: early chucrch fathers, who were they and what did they say to this effect)?

http://www.tms.edu/m/tmsj20i.pdf

I have read that passage in Romans, and I have read it again just now. None of it seems to indicate that Penal Substitutionary Atonement is a doctrine of truth.

Perhaps what you think PSA is and what I think it is are two different things...I see very clearly the doctrine of PSA spelled out in the Scripture I referenced.

Indeed. Will you say those are they described in Romans 9:22? Doesn't it break your heart?

No, I don't subscribe to a hyper-Calvinistic point of view.

Thank you. Please do try to figure out why we are not agreeing fully. It seems to me like it could be a combination of misunderstanding and personal dedication to fundamentally opposed doctrine

I think we should both try to figure out why we seem to disagree. It may be as you say, but, then again, maybe not.

Selah.
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I can't say as I quite understand what you're describing. In any case, it doesn't sound pleasant.
It was frightening. Do you know how you can speak with someone and be articulate and understand what you are talking about and have a clear picture of what the scriptures say? Do you know that is all given from God? Well the other day I was talking about scriptural matters, and it was almost totally removed from me. I knew it, the guys I was speaking to noticed something was not quite right, and I felt my fear saying to me that I was being cut off (I only remember right now the experience, not so much the details of the topic which caused me to realise what was going on). Yes aiki, it was terrifying - to know eternal life and to see that it can die.
I wasn't offended. I just thought it was important to clarify that my view is derived from Scripture. Yes, there are many views of the Gospel, but they are not all equal in how well they accord with God's Word. Some very clearly contort it, others do so more subtly. And some very few actually accurately represent the Gospel as it is. I believe my view does that and until it can be clearly shown that I am mistaken, I am confident in saying that my understanding of the Gospel is biblical.
Ok.
I have never actually encountered anyone who taught or even believed this "dangerous perversion of the gospel" that you say is prevalent.
Of course nobody ever would want to say it, but if someone is implying that it is ok to go on deliberately sinning, and that it is normal for Christians to do it, then it is a dangerous perversion of the gospel that is being taught. It is indeed prevalent. Winken has done it in this thread, by insisting on his word choice: "Christians drift into sin", which is the opposite of the gospel message: to confess that we are sinning, to be made holy, and to stop practising sin. Though we cannot do it in our own power, because it is God who prunes us. Though we do have to choose who we serve: whether we will choose the desires of the flesh or the desires of the spirit, and that determines the fruit produced.
Well, you seem to think that good works are part of being saved and I don't.
Not "good works", but "obedience", and fruits of the spirit are evidence of abiding in Christ. Do you acknowledge that some Christians (even self-professed Christians, if you prefer) do not abide in Christ, and therefore they do not produce fruits of The Holy Spirit? If so, are these people saved, and is it possible that some such people once did abide in Christ but were later cut off the true vine? Or, please explain what you think seems to be wrong about the view I have of it.
As I said, before we are saved we are like those described in John 3:19, 20, but after we are saved, we are like those described in the very next verse.
And perhaps the major difference here is that I know those who come to the light can be lured into sin and again become those in v 19-20. St Paul described that to Timothy, saying "For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil, for which some have strayed from the faith in their greediness, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows." - which is describing the person who corresponds to that where the seed fell on shallow soil: - it sprang up quickly, but as soon as temptation or trials came, it faded away to nothing. In all of these scriptures and illustrations though, there is clear indication that we are encouraged to be diligent, that we can cultivate the soil so that the seed will produce many times what was sown, and we can beware of the temptation of such things as the love of money, which will lure us away from faith.
Good deeds are the product of being in the light and give evidence that this is so. But good deeds cannot be the means of our salvation because before we are saved we are evil and hiding from the light.
Part of everyone has discovered that they gain from sin, and their conscience causes them shame to go into the light. So, sure, everyone who comes to the light must confess their sin and decide to repent. But there is part of even those who cannot go into the light, who does value righteousness. But for some who value their sin more than righteousness, they cannot give up their sin to come to the light.
It is only as God works in us making it possible to respond positively to the Gospel that we are able to confess our sins, accept Christ as our Saviour and Lord, and repent of a life lived apart from him. And when God has saved us, then it is that we can bring forth the good works that are the natural consequence of our salvation.
I accept this.
Thank you. I see in this, all of these early church fathers are living after the time of the disciples. This means they have only access to the scriptures, with the only exceptions being Clement of Rome and Ignatius who did have first-hand influence from the disciples who knew Jesus. Their statements in that file does not imply Penal Substitutionary Atonement doctrine, but they will be read to support it if one is predisposed to view PSA as a true doctrine. I noticed at this, the relevance of The Lord having shown me John 12:35 last week.
Perhaps what you think PSA is and what I think it is are two different things...I see very clearly the doctrine of PSA spelled out in the Scripture I referenced.
That is possible. I will quote from the file you referenced:

As Millard Erickson defines the doctrine, “By offering himself as a sacrifice, by substituting himself for us, actually bearing the punishment that should have been ours, Jesus appeased the Father and effected a reconciliation between God and humanity."

The bold bit is what I do not see scriptural evidence for. Without that bold bit, this statement can decribe the gospel in absence of PSA.

I do not see PSA spelled out in the passage you referenced. I reckon this is probably because I have totally utterly dispelled belief in PSA doctrine, and viewed all relevant scriptures accordingly, to understand the ransom sacrifice in absence of PSA. Then I have become accustomed to view the gospel of Jesus Christ apart from PSA, whereas you have submitted yourself in the opposite direction, probably to a similar extent. Therefore what you and I view in that same scripture seems to be supporting our individual view of the gospel message. If you could be specific about one particular verse you think cannot be understood without PSA, maybe I can see whether I have made a mistake. But as I mentioned, it is a discussion not suited for this thread. The other discussion is over here: http://www.christianforums.com/threads/why-substitutionary-atonement.7890113/, I welcome you to see how it has gone, and whether you might be able to contribute your views to it.
No, I don't subscribe to a hyper-Calvinistic point of view.
Why does that matter?
I think we should both try to figure out why we seem to disagree. It may be as you say, but, then again, maybe not.

Selah.
I see here, we seem to both be assuming the radical objectionable about each other's beliefs. Eg, you have stated I appear to be a legalist or Calvanist (far from true), and I seem to have said things about you that demonstrate inapplicable stereotypes too. PSA is a real line in the sand though.
 
Upvote 0

Matthew Twentyfour

Take up your cross daily, and follow Me. Luke 9:23
Jan 19, 2015
560
96
✟8,141.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You have to stay obedient in-Christ to be save. When one follows in obedience is when all the benefits comes.


John 12:46-48

46 I have come as a light into the world, that whoever believes in Me should not abide in darkness. 47 And if anyone hears My words and does not believe, I do not judge him; for I did not come to judge the world but to save the world.48 He who rejects Me, and does not receive My words, has that which judges him—the word that I have spoken will judge him in the last day.

John 15:1-6
1 “I am the true vine, and My Father is the vinedresser. 2 Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit He takes away; and every branch that bears fruit He prunes, that it may bear more fruit. 3 You are already clean because of the word which I have spoken to you. 4 Abide in Me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in Me.
5 “I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing. 6 If anyone does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned.

1 John 2:3-6
3 Now by this we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. 4 He who says, “I know Him,” and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. 5 But whoever keeps His word, truly the love of God is perfected in him. By this we know that we are in Him. 6 He who says he abides in Him ought himself also to walk just as He walked.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,794
✟322,485.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Jesus said "If someone causes one of these little ones who trusts in me to stumble, it will be better for a millstone to be tied around their neck and cast into the sea.", and "whoever is not working for me is actually working against me". St Paul stated his disapproval bys saying "if anyone should preach a gospel other than what we have preached, let him be accursed". That gospel is stated in many different ways, but none so clearly relevant to righting the misleading doctrines in this thread, as Hebrews 10:26-27.
The message of the gospel may have gotten a little overwhelmed by putting three or four different verses and ideas together.

What is the gospel?

The gospel is the Good News that Jesus Christ died for ALL the sins of the world and that anyone who believes in Him will have eternal life.


There were people that were coming into the early established churches and teaching that people had to be circumcised and follow the Law of Moses for eternal life. That was one of the things that Paul was talking about when he said 'another gospel'. It was false teachers teaching something other than salvation through the atoning blood of Jesus Christ.

Now, for your other point where Jesus talks about leading others to stumble, it is about putting barriers or creating conditions that takes people away from the true gospel preached by Jesus and the apostles. That could be about the gospel, but it could be any false condition that are put before people, both those in Christ and those not saved.

The other verse you quoted is about those who are not working for me is actually working against me, I don't believe that that is about the gospel at all.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Matthew Twentyfour

Take up your cross daily, and follow Me. Luke 9:23
Jan 19, 2015
560
96
✟8,141.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Would anyone who supports OSAS like to answer this question?

I don't know if this had already been mentioned here but would a Muslim be going to heaven if he was once a Christian believer?

http://www.cbn.com/spirituallife/on...ndingislam/why_are_westerners_converting.aspx

And these questions also.

1) "Since Klu Klux Klan members are also Christians, will there be Klan members in heaven?"

http://www.christianpost.com/news/k...n-claims-the-klan-is-not-a-hate-group-116614/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/21/virginia-kkk-fliers_n_5008647.html

2) "If anyone can be eternally saved (regardless of their future actions) by professing Christ as savior and continue living their current lifestyle, what's the difference between living in heaven verses living on earth if the people in heaven behave no different than those on earth?"

3) Christian taking the mark of the beast during the tribulation are forever saved too?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,794
✟322,485.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Would anyone who supports OSAS like to answer this question?



And these questions also.

1) "Since Klu Klux Klan members are also Christians, will there be Klan members in heaven?"

http://www.christianpost.com/news/k...n-claims-the-klan-is-not-a-hate-group-116614/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/21/virginia-kkk-fliers_n_5008647.html

2) "If anyone can be eternally saved (regardless of their future actions) by professing Christ as savior and continue living their current lifestyle, what's the difference between living in heaven verses living on earth if the people in heaven behave no different than those on earth?"

3) Christian taking the mark of the beast during the tribulation are forever saved too?

I know what the Bible tells me about who will be saved.

I do not know each of the people's hearts, I only know mine.

I know however that if they have the Holy Spirit living inside of them, that that is the guarantee of our salvation and our inheritance until it is fulfilled and we receive our full inheritance in Christ.

I am not God and I cannot say who has God's Spirit or not.

#3 I am not sure about. Do you have verses for that one?
 
Upvote 0

Matthew Twentyfour

Take up your cross daily, and follow Me. Luke 9:23
Jan 19, 2015
560
96
✟8,141.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I do not know each of the people's hearts, I only know mine.

This sounds like a condition. Are you saying a person's salvation is based on their heart?

I know however that if they have the Holy Spirit living inside of them, that that is the guarantee of our salvation and our inheritance until it is fulfilled and we receive our full inheritance in Christ.

In your opinion, when do Christians receive the holy spirit, and when are they saved?

#3 I am not sure about. Do you have verses for that one?

Daniel 7:25
He shall speak pompous words against the Most High,
Shall persecute the saints of the Most High,
And shall intend to change times and law.
Then the saints shall be given into his hand
For a time and times and half a time.


Revelation 13:7-10
7 It was granted to him to make war with the saints and to overcome them
. And authority was given him over every tribe, tongue, and nation. 8 All who dwell on the earth will worship him, whose names have not been written in the Book of Life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
9 If anyone has an ear, let him hear. 10 He who leads into captivity shall go into captivity; he who kills with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.

Everyone that follows the beast and accept the mark will not have their name written in the book of life. But the ones who refused the mark of the beast and not follow him will have their heads cut off, but will be resurrected at the end of the tribulation to reign with Christ in the millennium.

Revelation 20:4
I saw thrones, and sitting on those thrones were the ones who had been given the right to judge. I also saw the souls of the people who had their heads cut off because they had told about Jesus and preached God’s message. They were the same ones who had not worshiped the beast or the idol, and they had refused to let its mark be put on their hands or foreheads. They will come to life and rule with Christ for a thousand years.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,794
✟322,485.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
This sounds like a condition. Are you saying a person's salvation is based on their heart?

Well, one has to truly want God in their life and to be choosing Him with an earnest and open heart. And I don't know what anyone else's motivation is.

In your opinion, when do Christians receive the holy spirit, and when are they saved?
Yes, directly after their sins have been forgiven. Without sin in the way, then the Holy Spirit can reside inside of us.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Matthew Twentyfour

Take up your cross daily, and follow Me. Luke 9:23
Jan 19, 2015
560
96
✟8,141.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Well, one has to truly want God in their life and to be choosing Him with an earnest and open heart. And I don't know what anyone else's motivation is.

Yes, directly after their sins have been forgiven. Without sin in the way, then the Holy Spirit can reside inside of us.

I just wanna make sure we're on the same page.

So based on Romans 10:9, a person is saved at that moment if he confesses and believe in his heart?
 
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,349
Winnipeg
✟236,538.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
"I don't know if this had already been mentioned here but would a Muslim be going to heaven if he was once a Christian believer?"

There is no true Christian who is now a Muslim. As the apostle John explained:

1 John 2:19 (NKJV)
19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them were of us.

Anyone who claims to have once been a Christian but who is now Muslim (or an adherent to any other religion) was never a believer in the first place. Their denial of Christ merely reveals them for the "tare" that they are.

And these questions also.

1) "Since Klu Klux Klan members are also Christians, will there be Klan members in heaven?"

Again, not everyone who claims to be a Christian actually is one. As Jesus plainly stated,

Matthew 7:16-21 (NKJV)
16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles?
17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.
18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.
19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
21 "Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven.


Real, genuine, saving faith is always evidenced in corresponding behaviour. This is what the apostle James points out very sharply in the second chapter of the New Testament book bearing his name. KKK members are not "bearing good fruit." No matter what they may claim about an allegiance to Jesus, their works show that their faith is not truly in the Good Shepherd who taught:

Matthew 5:43-45 (NKJV)
43 "You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.'
44 But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you,
45 that you may be sons of your Father in heaven...


2) "If anyone can be eternally saved (regardless of their future actions) by professing Christ as savior and continue living their current lifestyle, what's the difference between living in heaven verses living on earth if the people in heaven behave no different than those on earth?"

No one who espouses the OSAS view supports the idea that salvation means one can live like the devil. I have heard OSAS preached and taught many times over the forty two years I've been a Christian and not once has it ever been said by those who so preached and taught that being saved was a license to sin. In fact, the very opposite is always preached. I don't understand why, then, those opposed to OSAS so regularly throw up this Strawman of the OSAS position.

3) Christian taking the mark of the beast during the tribulation are forever saved too?

I seriously doubt a genuine Christian believer will ever take the Mark Of the Beast. But even if they did, is God's grace so small that it cannot cover this sin? That's not what I read in Scripture:

Romans 5:20 (NKJV)
20 Moreover the law entered that the offense might abound. But where sin abounded, grace abounded much more,


Selah.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Matthew Twentyfour

Take up your cross daily, and follow Me. Luke 9:23
Jan 19, 2015
560
96
✟8,141.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

So based on Romans 10:9 a person is eternally saved in your opinion. So this goes back to my original questions. Doesn't it seem odd that people like the Klu Klux Klan members --- which are Christians --- will go to heaven based on OSAS?

Doesn't it seem odd that anyone who's a Christian can take the mark of the beast during the tribulation, follow the beast and still go to heaven based on OSAS?

Now here's a new question. For now let's hypothetical pretend there's two routes to heaven: A) Your works under the OT law and B) OSAS.

Which group of people are more righteous and likely to sin less?
~ Group A, those trying to earn their way to heaven practising the OT law in obedience.
or
~ Group B, those allowed to continue living their current lifestyle (being carnal, serving money instead of God) without the need to change or improve?

Doesn't the people in Group B sound like those who died during the flood during the time of Noah. Except this time they're allowed to go to heaven because the belief under OSAS is Christ's death paid for everyone's sin past, present and future. Everyone who accepted Christ's gift of salvation is going to heaven no matter how badly they sin.

Does all this seem right? A heaven filled with thieves, murderers, idolaters, adulterers, fornicators, homosexuality, and liars. Doesn't it seem like we're going backwards under OSAS? Moses brought the law to stop people from committing all those sins above.

I know we can't earn our way to heaven under the law, this is just a hypothetical questionaire.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.