patricius79
Called to Jesus Through Mary
Yes. What it was not was denominational.
True. It was simply "the Catholic Church", with Rome presiding in love, and believing that Mary is the Ever-Virgin New Eve.
Upvote
0
Yes. What it was not was denominational.
Evidently the Sardica council canons are "attached" to Nice canons and some confuse that the two are identical, but they are not.An ancient MS. written in Arabic which was discovered by a Jesuit scholar in the 16th century and is kept in the Vatican library. It's authenticity is questionable, but it still provides much historical insight. There was a tradition in the Oriental Church soon after the time of the council that up to 40 canons were issued. The 20 canons that we go by today are the only ones that can be authenticated with certainty.
I don't think the Bible says that the guys writing the gospel implied Mary and Joseph had kids after Jesus. That is an opinion about the Bible, isn't it?
I think it is beautiful how Calvin and Luther and JB Lightfoot and the great early Biblical scholars like Augustine, Ambrose, Didymus, Cyril of Alex., Hilary, Athanasius, Leo, Jerome, and Epiphanius all affirmed the Ever-Virginity of Mary
http://www.catholic.com/tracts/mary-ever-virgin
Yes. What it was not was denominational.
This was not established until later and was based more on the importance of the city of Rome than upon Peter. In any case, "primacy" doesn't pose too many problems; claims of supremacy and infallibility--which came later--are the main problem areas.
There certainly were. Any historian can advise you on that.
I'm sorry, but that's purely myth. I'm sure you were taught that in some religion class or RCIA, but it's untrue.
Now at this point, I'd suggest you stop trying to convert me to your church. I, in turn, will not spend post after post lecturing you on the Anglican view of all things, complete with everything that is unrelated to our topic here.
Oh yes, that's what you've been taught by your denomination to say when representing it to others. But I've heard it all before...and from quite a few different denominations, in fact.Christ never intended it to be denominational. That's why it still isn't. The Protestant denominations are not different branches of faith in the one Apostolic Catholic Church. They are independent separated churches which were founded by men.
Whether Mary remained a virgin or not doesn't affect salvation, so it is an interesting point. Maybe when I read through those passages in the Eastern Orthodox study bible that I picked up, I'll find something useful regarding this.
Oh yes, that's what you've been taught by your denomination to say when representing it to others. But I've heard it all before...and from quite a few different denominations, in fact.
But Protestantism began in the 1500s, while the Catholic Church is from the beginning, and has always believed that Mary is Ever-Virgin.
Tut, tut. Here you go again, making the vain claim that your church "has always believed" this. Thus far you have not provided any proof to this claim. I suggest that you either show us definitive proof from those who were eye-witnesses to the bedroom life of Joseph and Mary or cease making these embarrassing statements about the marital relationship of Joseph and Mary.
Tut, tut. Here you go again, making the vain claim that your church "has always believed" this. Thus far you have not provided any proof to this claim. I suggest that you either show us definitive proof from those who were eye-witnesses to the bedroom life of Joseph and Mary or cease making these embarrassing statements about the marital relationship of Joseph and Mary.
We are talking about the Mother of God.
Indeed we are. Thus I find it disgusting to have anyone speculate on the bedroom life of my own parents. However, there are those who are fascinated with the sex life (or lack thereof) of Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ.
That sounds good. I think that the Marian doctrines, including Mary's Ever-Virginity, are matters of salvation. However, if a person is not sufficiently informed or free, then they have an excuse.
If I remember right, the 7th Ecumenical Council anathemized anyone who said that Mary is not Ever-Virgin.
Tut, tut. Here you go again, making the vain claim that your church "has always believed" this. Thus far you have not provided any proof to this claim. I suggest that you either show us definitive proof from those who were eye-witnesses to the bedroom life of Joseph and Mary or cease making these embarrassing statements about the marital relationship of Joseph and Mary.
She was reserved to do the will of God and not man.
She was reserved to God's will and purpose and was kept from much of the wife's functions outside of that one and only function of bearing the hope of the world in her womb.
She forever remains God's handmaiden. Blessed is the womb that brought forth the hope for all of humanity.
So, in many ways Rome broke away from the faith once delivered. One such way was that the early Catholic Church did not believe Mary was ever-virgin (see scripture 1 John, Tertulian, Cyril of Jerusalem, and others).
By the way, the Church has always believed that Jesus rose from the dead and ascended into heaven. How do you prove this claim? The Bible? There was no NT in the first century
Yes, but I beleive it because I don't live in the first century and DO have a copy of God's word.
Name some of the ones referred to in that verse and we'll discuss.But God's word says to hold fast to the traditions, whether given orally or by letter.