How would it produce a completely thermal spectrum we observe in the CMB? All observed bremsstrahlung is frequency dependent. What is this as of yet unspecified frequency independent bremsstrahlung? How is it propagating over interstallar and intergalactic distances without meaningful scatter?
The CMB? Now that's a laugh. You really want to know how, or have you not thought it out yet?
A complete thermal spectrum? You mean a specific spectrum of microwave at the frequency of 3K right which is all you consider? I'm not convinced you understand the theory yet. It's the Cosmic Microwave background Radiating at 3K.
So, let's look at the solar wind. Charged particles increasing in acceleration out past the orbits of the planets which comes to an almost complete stop at the heliosphere. Man you sure do like ignoring Bremsstrahlung don't you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremsstrahlung
"is electromagnetic radiation produced by the
deceleration of a charged particle when deflected by another charged particle, typically an electron by an atomic nucleus.
The moving particle loses kinetic energy, which is converted into a photon, thus satisfying the law of conservation of energy. The term is also used to refer to the process of producing the radiation. Bremsstrahlung has a continuous spectrum, which becomes more intense and whose peak intensity shifts toward higher frequencies as the change of the energy of the accelerated particles increases."
So, what do we know by the laws of physics happens when a charged particle collides with another particle or is stopped by an electric field? Why it produces a continuous spectrum through Bremsstrahlung which is frequency independent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_spectrum
"In particular, the position and momentum of a free particle have a continuous spectrum, but when the particle is confined to a limited space its spectrum becomes discrete."
So now we begin to understand the differences between plasma confined in a glass jar - and
plasma in space, and electrons bound to atoms.
So tell me, do these charged solar wind particles being continuously accelerated out past the planets, when they come to an almost complete stop at the heliosphere not do anything????
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy
"In physics, the
kinetic energy of an object is the energy that it possesses due to its motion.[1] It is defined as the work needed to accelerate a body of a given mass from rest to its stated velocity. Having gained this energy during its acceleration, the body maintains this kinetic energy unless its speed changes.
The same amount of work is done by the body in decelerating from its current speed to a state of rest."
No that certainly is not the case. I don't believe you have accounted for that energy in any of the CMB maps, nor the brightest thing in the sky by 2 to 3 times you couldn't even "see" a couple years ago. I say it is that Bremsstrahlung which is the CMB, since it is the dominant form of radiation observed everywhere.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremsstrahlung
"The dominant luminous component in a cluster of galaxies is the 107 to 108 kelvin intracluster medium. The emission from the intracluster medium is characterized by thermal bremsstrahlung...Bremsstrahlung is also the dominant emission mechanism for H II regions at radio wavelengths."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_frequency
"Microwave exposure at low-power levels below the
Specific absorption rate set by government regulatory bodies are considered harmless non-ionizing radiation and have no effect on the human body."
So instead of radio wavelengths they could of just said at Microwave frequencies. Which is what we would expect in a 360 degree sphere from the solar wind coming to an almost complete stop. Remeber the science part about Kinetic Energy linked to above?
No, the brightest source in the sky not even considered in your theory - because to you it was dark just a few years ago. You know, the solar wind and that ring that falsified every solar system model you had?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliosphere#Heliopause
"Initial data from
Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX), launched in October 2008, revealed a previously unpredicted "very narrow ribbon that is
two to three times brighter than anything else in the sky...."
"...The IBEX results are truly remarkable! What we are seeing in these maps does not match with any of the previous theoretical models of this region."
Your theories always fail the main test of a theory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictive_power
"The
predictive power of a scientific theory refers to its ability to generate testable predictions.[
citation needed] Theories with strong predictive power are highly valued because they have practical applications."
Here's the citation needed, so you don't try to claim something.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
" - It makes
falsifiable predictions with consistent accuracy across a broad area of scientific inquiry"
All of which yours fail.
![[serious]](/data/avatars/m/160/160873.jpg?1431539545){kind=avatar}
Sad actually.
