Recent content by religious&reasonable

It was not well done IMO. Cinematography was beautiful, but everything else was lackluster. Characterization was sub-par, and I don't think this movie even had a plot. Everything happened at random. The film lackd an anatagonist of any kind, giving us nothing to rally behind or against. It was...

Why was their a "tree of knowledge" in the first place? Wahat was it's use and purpose?

Dude, to be honest nothing is or sounds as crazy as Scientology. I'd be a libertarian before I'd be a scientologist any day of the week.

I am hoping Paul wins, but that is a long road ahead.

Ron Paul

Ron Paul 2012.

I agree with this post. I guess it falls into the area of not following bodily urges.

Yes, why not? Agreed.

It appears that truthHurts77 has just activated his troll mode.

I see your point, but a fetus is a human already in development, which means sooner or later it will eventually be a human baby (except for certian circumstances such as a miscarriage). At that point it has a far greater value of potential than say a sperm or skin cell.

He has the best foreign policy based on economic preservation IMO.

You just won the internet. And I don't think anyone knows the answer to this, but we can only hope that there is.

No insulting or flaming please. I come in peace. So, some people consider a fetus not to be a person, or a part of the female and nothing more during inital pregnancy for it is not self-aware or self-concious. Therefore it is the Woman's right to decide. But isn't the potential for human...

None of your examples are actually socialist. Jim Jones was just purely insane. stalin was communist, Kim-Jong is dictatorship/whatever the heck is going on over there, Hitler was a facist, and Ghaddafi is the same as Kim-Jong.

My gosh, that is all kinds of awesome.