Don't go ad hom on me. The writer may be a rabidly Christian hating loon for all I know. If you actually read what he says, he debunks the whole "shooter was targeting Christians" thing pretty thoroughly, with sources. Go have a look.
you presented a biased source
I was merely trying to point that out
it seems that some of the victims were not Christian
one of the victims the author says "would probably not want to be remembered as a Christian martyr"
and points to the fact that the person has posted on Facebook about progressive political issues and did not talk about religion
... that seems like a stretch to assume that a person was or was not a Christian, just because they do not talk about it a lot?
one of them it is reported that "he would probably call himself an agnostic"
well did he describe himself that way?
did his close friends and family describe him that way?
or is this just based on his facebook?
another one made a joke about Jehovah's Witness coming to the door
ok?
I think everyone has made jokes about that
the article is written with a clear bias by someone who calls claims to be "friendly" but is really just a poor journalist who has more interest in advancing a world view then in finding the truth.