If yes, how similar or different is it from the RCC? If no, does EOC teach only about Heaven and Hell?
Thank you
Thank you
No purgatory, but since I see your Chaldean what does your church teach on the matter and is it different from the Assyrian Church of the east?
we do not teach that there is a third "place" for souls. there is a purging, but it is the fire of the presence of God, and not a created fire or some temporal place.
...As far as I know, Rome came up with that one, post schism.
Thank you all for your replies. I am learning a lot. If you don't mind I have more questions.
What does your church teach about what happens after death? I mean before the second coming.
And do you pray for the people who have gone before us? Offer Masses and such?
Thanks again for your responses.
What does your church teach about what happens after death? I mean before the second coming.
And do you pray for the people who have gone before us? Offer Masses and such?
I don't know exactly when the idea of purgatory became RC dogma, but...
According to the authors of Catholicism for Dummies, the RCC teaches the idea of purgatory due to 2 Maccabees (12:43-46). The thinking is that souls who're prayed for must be in a place other than heaven or hell. If they're in hell, no prayers would help them; if they're in heaven, they haven't need of prayers.
I'm just paraphrasing what the authors wrote; please, don't debate me on this issue. :o
SS
If yes, how similar or different is it from the RCC? If no, does EOC teach only about Heaven and Hell?
Thank you
We do not offer liturgies for the departed, but we do pray for them. We pray especially for the 40 days after death and each year on the anniversary of their repose. We have a service called a Panikhida for them, which you can see here:
Panikhida Part1 - Prayers for the Departed - YouTube
I'll never understand why we Catholics felt the need to make our Mass borderline ugly.
Nor I, my friend. Nor I. The Latin Church has a staggeringly beautiful liturgical tradition that has been disdained and destroyed over the past century and though I can understand why people want the mass in English (we celebrate in the vernacular) I cannot for the life of me understand why anyone would prefer the Gather hymnal and the overall cheesiness of the new mass to the transcendent beauty of the Gregorian mass.
I remember the change when I was Anglican, when a priest who was off the boat from England started doing some of the more traditional services (especially around Easter), and I wondered why we had not done those from the beginning. and that was nowhere near the beauty of the more traditional Roman Catholic rites.
At this very moment, I am agreeing with you and listening to a Mass by Palestrina. Ah, those were the days...