No, those are fetuses. Here are is a baby picture.
A fetus us just a baby in the womb.
You are killing a human being if you kill a fetus. You are violently slaughtering a baby.
From: Medical Dictionary, Medical Abbreviations and Other Search Engines - MediLexicon
baby
Type: Term
Pronunciation: bā′bē
Definitions:
1. An infant; a newborn child.
fetus
Type: Term
Pronunciation: fē′tŭs, fē′tŭs-ez
Definitions:
1. The unborn young of a viviparous animal following the embryonic period.
2. In humans, the product of conception from the end of the eighth week of gestation to the moment of birth.
abortion (AB)
Type: Term
Pronunciation: ă-bōr′shŭn
Definitions:
1. Expulsion from the uterus of an embryo or fetus before viability (20 weeks' gestation [18 weeks after fertilization] or fetal weight less than 500 g). A distinction made between abortion and premature birth is that premature infants are those born after the stage of viability but before 37 weeks' gestation. Abortion may be either spontaneous (occurring from natural causes) or induced (artificially or therapeutically).
2. The arrest of any action or process before its normal completion.
Weird...no mention of baby...
You're not even fooling yourself.
Abortion is the violent execution of an innocent human being.
You're not even fooling yourself.
Abortion is the violent execution of an innocent human being.
I'm not even fooling myself? I have no idea what you're talking about. I'm guessing that's the best you could come up with because you won't concede a point.
Abortion is not the "violent execution of an innocent human being."
.
How many babies died in the Flood in Genesis?
I have no idea.
If it is a big number does that entitle you to kill one baby?
Is that your point?
Of course it is, as you know.
Have you ever seen an abortion via ultrasound?
It is a brutal and painful death.
God makes the rules, we don't.
Thou shalt not kill is our rule, not his.
We don't understand him, but he understands us.
If you kill his child, you are breaking his rules.
What dies during an abortion is not a human being.You're not even fooling yourself.
Abortion is the violent execution of an innocent human being.
Of course it is, as you know.
Have you ever seen an abortion via ultrasound?
It is a brutal and painful death.
What led you to think that?quote=arundel; I thought being pro-life was a strong unifying belief between Catholics and Protestants.
A narrow sampling of anecdotal information, maybe not enough to convoncingly support any conclusion.I spoke with several friends (evangelical & reformed protestants) throughout the country who confirmed this to be the case. One active pro-lifer friend said that at the pro-life initiatives his family has participated in over the years, the participants are either 90% or 100% Catholic.
So then people there were presumptive as well?When I first began sidewalk counseling the first question was, "what parish are you from?" The assumption was that I was Catholic.
You mean pro-life in the same way you are?My question is: Why aren't more Protestants pro-life?
It might be because the people perpetuating that reputation are being presumptive. At any rate, just because someone is 'on your side' with any one issue, doesn't necessarily imply they are there for the same reasons, so the question lacks depth on that point as well.Why do Protestants have a reputation as being non-participants in fighting for the unborn?
Is it real?Is it cultural? Is it theological? Is it a matter of priorities? Is it apathy?
Not realy. What I noticed is that Catholics make it an "official policy" which makes it easier for Catholics to organize.Also, have you noticed this too?
I'm not sure there's anything realy there to talk about, much less 'change'.What can we do to change this?
Show me the demographics & the explanations.To be sure I know that there are many active pro-life Protestants. But why are there so so so so so many more active pro-life Catholics? (far beyond any demographic explanations)
Oops, too late.I've been apathetic for most of my life too, so I don't mean to condemn anyone.
Why? CanI see those money donated & participant figures?I'm just really surprised that the pro-life movement is primarily a Catholic initiative (at least by money donated and number of participants).
What do you call the violent, intentional killing of an innocent human life?
Here's some reality for you.
California Man Convicted of Double Murder, Killing Pregnant Girlfriend Unborn Child
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]A 34-year-old California man, Aaron Ashley was convicted of two counts of murder in the killings of his pregnant girlfriend and her unborn child.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]California is one of 35 states to have a state law allowing two charges with both mother and child are killed.[/FONT]
Makes sense for a tooth extraction. But a tooth does not have a father nor is it capable of independent life outside the mouth.... even if it is an inconvenient tooth.
Pregnancy is considered an inconvenience by some, but you can't morally kill a human being for convenience.
No, thats up to the moderators, Chestertonrules thinks its relevant and so do I so you are outnumbered. Besaidses as discussion requires reasoning, all you are doing is contradicting. When one acknowledges the life starts at conception then abortion is killing, your argument is that it isnt life and thats what you need to expand on.Not applicable to this discussion.