Disgraceful

HotToast

Laughmaster
Aug 29, 2005
7,338
1,063
✟19,600.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I saw recently only 20% of money donated to a charity was ending up in the charities pocket, the rest went to the collector.
Has me thinking.

Which charitry was that? I don't think that is the norm. As others have said the "administration costs" (read salaries and advertising) is usually between 20-30 per cent.

Theres actually a bit going about World Vision at the moment. As far as I know a lot of World Vision staff are paid. So there efficiency certainly is not as high as I thought it would be. Do you think the people that man the stalls for World Vision should get paid? I mean at the end of the day, it's their business model...but it surprised me a bit when I found that out. I know Salvos in America work on 85% efficiency, and one of the other aid organisations I work for work on 75%. I think World Vision may run on 60-50, not sure.

Do you really think that charities shouldn't employ people? Personally I don't think charities would be viable for the long term if they don't employ people. Most people can't volunteer all of their time. That means that they are juggling full time work as well as their volunteer work. If someone is employed full time then they can put all of their energy into it.

However I do object to charities that pay people (usually backpackers) to stand in the shopping centre all day, and try to get people to sign up to monthly donations. I know that I have seen the Red Cross,
WWF, the Childrens Fund doing this.

yerr, we did a thing in humanities at school about that.

the salvos have just set up this fund so you can buy a community a goat for like $7, a wheelchair for like $300. Our youth is aiming to buy a child surgery $1000 next year.

So I think that, & getting people in there to teach them skills so they can make their own money are some great steps to bypass the goverment.


What do you guys feel about initatives like this :http://www.usefulgifts.org/viewall.php? know that Oxfam also do something similar. How would you feel if someone gave you one of those as your Christmas gift?

I feel that there is a lot of rubbish given for Christmas. So last Christmas when my parents asked me what I wanted I said something from this catalogue. They were very suprised. This year I think they forgot about this!

I like to give them to people, to make them think about donating to charity. It certainly a topic that most people don't talk about.

I also know that many young people have the attitude that it's poor people's own fault. So it is refreshing to see your attitude ChristinAction!
 
Upvote 0

Neenie1

Senior Veteran
Feb 17, 2005
5,353
175
48
✟21,306.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What do you guys feel about initatives like this :http://www.usefulgifts.org/viewall.php? know that Oxfam also do something similar. How would you feel if someone gave you one of those as your Christmas gift?

I feel that there is a lot of rubbish given for Christmas. So last Christmas when my parents asked me what I wanted I said something from this catalogue. They were very suprised. This year I think they forgot about this!

I like to give them to people, to make them think about donating to charity. It certainly a topic that most people don't talk about.

I also know that many young people have the attitude that it's poor people's own fault. So it is refreshing to see your attitude ChristinAction!


I really like these gift ideas.

We got one one year and it was wonderful.




I haven't given anything like that but I have tried to only give things that I know will be useful and won't be thrown out or broken a week later. My relatives etc. are getting clothes that I made (I knit and sew) my mum and dad are getting coffee mugs with I love Grandma and I love Grandpa on it. I know they will use these lol. The kids are getting clothes (not my kids my neice and nephew) but they are also getting a book each so it's a bit more fun.


I can't remember what everyone else is getting.

I am tired of it, I have started to become slightly more environmentally aware, thinking of the energy that goes into making the cheap rubbishy things that just don't get used so I have tried avoiding buying anything like that.

I have asked my mum to get my kids things they will use. Ds is getting a scooter and stationery for school (by scooter I mean one of those ones that they can ride on or rather push themselves along with) he is also getting a lunchbox for school. I know he will love these just as much as fancy flashy junky toys.

Dd is getting a dolls house, a nice wooden one that will last for years and mum's going to pay for her to go to toddler gym which is something she needs for her legs.


There is so much rubbish around and I have started to become more aware of the energy and effort that goes into making the rubbish and the strain on the environment too.
 
Upvote 0

John Spong is wrong

Regular Member
Feb 13, 2005
440
32
Perth
Visit site
✟735.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
Still pretty cool.
I agree - it is still pretty cool. :)

And yes, Australia is second only behind Ireland in private giving (on a per capita basis). We've only been lagging behind in terms of government aid as a percentage of GNI because we had the misfortune to suffer from 11 1/2 years of John Howard's 'leadership'. :sick: As you probably know, Kevin Rudd will be increasing Australia's overseas aid to 0.5% GNI by his second term. (He's already done other fantastic things that were also long overdue like ratify Kyoto and end the blame game w.r.t. Commonwealth-State health funding).
 
Upvote 0

Talie

Senior Veteran
Apr 16, 2004
2,581
91
52
Gippsland
Visit site
✟18,211.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Australia isn't that bad - per capita - we donated way more to the tsunami relief than ANY OTHER COUNTRY

also, you need to remember that aust has been going through a lot of natural disasters ourselves, to which peopl ehqave contributed a lot of funds - where I live in Gippsland for example, we're dealing with the drought - how many years are they saying it's been now? 10? and then last January, & Last december/this Jan we had the worst bushfires on record (yes, two years running) AND we had the worst floods ever this year also - that's a lot to be dealing with so sometimes looking towards what's going on at home before dealing with issues beyond our boarders is not such a bad thing
 
Upvote 0

ChristInAction

Beloved Child
May 14, 2006
917
61
31
Melbourne
Visit site
✟8,880.00
Faith
Salvation Army
Marital Status
Single
Christinaction, do you sponsor a child? If not, why not?
No, because I'm 15 & I dont have a job.
I dont get pocket money, so therefore I do not have anything to give.
I've always said as soon as i have a job i will sponcer a child. For the mean time, i give what i can
 
Upvote 0

ChristInAction

Beloved Child
May 14, 2006
917
61
31
Melbourne
Visit site
✟8,880.00
Faith
Salvation Army
Marital Status
Single
Australia isn't that bad - per capita - we donated way more to the tsunami relief than ANY OTHER COUNTRY

also, you need to remember that aust has been going through a lot of natural disasters ourselves, to which peopl ehqave contributed a lot of funds - where I live in Gippsland for example, we're dealing with the drought - how many years are they saying it's been now? 10? and then last January, & Last december/this Jan we had the worst bushfires on record (yes, two years running) AND we had the worst floods ever this year also - that's a lot to be dealing with so sometimes looking towards what's going on at home before dealing with issues beyond our boarders is not such a bad thing
ya dont think i dont know that,
i live in victoria as well, but the problem is, most people dont even do that.
They dont help the people in your own back yard because i can walk around almost any suburb in melbourne & see people living on the streets.
 
Upvote 0

Talie

Senior Veteran
Apr 16, 2004
2,581
91
52
Gippsland
Visit site
✟18,211.00
Faith
Non-Denom
you weren't talking about people in our back yard - and i see you happily disregarded the point about austalia giving so much to the tsunami relief

clearly, you're just out to be grumpy and only see the bad side of things

I'm not for a second defending those who don't give - there are plenty of those to be sure - but you can't go calling EVERYONE bad
 
Upvote 0

ChristInAction

Beloved Child
May 14, 2006
917
61
31
Melbourne
Visit site
✟8,880.00
Faith
Salvation Army
Marital Status
Single
you weren't talking about people in our back yard - and i see you happily disregarded the point about austalia giving so much to the tsunami relief

clearly, you're just out to be grumpy and only see the bad side of things

I'm not for a second defending those who don't give - there are plenty of those to be sure - but you can't go calling EVERYONE bad
I was just saying my opinion, your the one trying to turn it back on me. Or start an argument.

Never said everyone was bad.
I wasnt saying anyone was bad for that matter.
I was simpley saying that its rather sad that in a countrey that has so much, we give so little.

In the 1st post I said I shouldnt be supprised by the stastic because we been able to end our own poverty, let alone help someone elses.

& i'm not disragarding anything. I wasnt really old enough at the time to understand what happened with the tsunami, or the extent of it but I do know that many countries got in there & did all they could, it was great.
But I dont wish to comment on something that I admit I dont really understand.

I also am not trying to see the bad side of things, I help out the salvos regularly & I do see how amazingly generous some people are.
But by those statistics, a lot of people aren't too.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Cooch

Regular Member
Oct 8, 2006
543
52
Cookardinia
✟15,964.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Not only does it appear that Australia has one of the highest rates of private giving, but it also has one of the highest rates of volunteering in the world - which is the giving of time, rather than of money.

I do not believe that it is fair to abuse Australians for not giving through government (with it's higher rates of inefficiency, when they choose rather to give privately and through NGOs.

I also believe that it is unfair to ignore the considerable charity given by Australians to those within our own borders. Needy people living in Australia are still needy, and should not be ignored when we're talking about the world's disadvantaged peoples. Nor is there something wrong with looking after your own backyard first. Does no scripture say that someone who did not look after their own is "worse than an unbeliever"?

It is true that the vast majority of long-term poverty is politically driven. Therefore Australia's peace-keeping forces overseas are just as much "aid" as are donations of cash or food. Especially in situations where politics prevent food-aid from reaching those who need it. Do you consider the cost of such peace-keeping?
Do we consider the fact that we provide raw materials that are helping drive the Asian economic boom that is dragging hundreds of millions out of poverty?

My suggestion to "ChristinAction" is twofold.
(1) Before criticising Australians, consider our whole effect on the world around us .... not just one small subset of it.
(2) Consider carefully before you criticise people who have needs and priorities which you have yet to experience. You say that you don't have "a job",,, but you could be mowing lawns, babysitting or collecting recyclable metals. If you are serious about giving, you'll be doing this - but it will cost you time that you'd rather be spending on other things (like sitting at your computer perhaps.)

There are more than one ways to give...... and more than one way to measure giving.

Peter (25-year volunteer)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Talie
Upvote 0

Talie

Senior Veteran
Apr 16, 2004
2,581
91
52
Gippsland
Visit site
✟18,211.00
Faith
Non-Denom
well said Peter - you're right about giving in other ways being just as important - i've been a near full time volunteer for 4 years now - and volunteeered in other ways before that too... never had much money to give, but i've had skills and time and I don't think they are less value to those who receive them
 
Upvote 0

ChristInAction

Beloved Child
May 14, 2006
917
61
31
Melbourne
Visit site
✟8,880.00
Faith
Salvation Army
Marital Status
Single
I wasnt trying to start a fight with you lot I was trying to speak my opinion.
We're blessed to be aloud to do that in australia.
I'm 15, at my age I have alot more of an opinion then most, because i have a passion for helping people. It also makes you 21 & 38 years older then me.
Your welcome to correct me if I'm wrong but not in the way you are.
Your being judgemental, I dont put up with that from people me own age,
why would I put up with it from people that are suppose to be grown up & mature enough not to act like that?

God has given me a passion for people.
I see them suffering here, starving in other countries & millions of kids being sold to humen traffikers because their family cant afford anything.
I cant help but stand up & scream for them.
Vollentering is great, I do it everytime I'm given a chance.
I never said anywhere that vollentering or giving in other ways is bad.
I also never said that any person was bad.
But you just skip over what you dont wanna read.
Work isnt that easy to get at my age, my home doesnt make it any easier.
Though I will never use that as an excuse not to do something.
I do what I can to earn money.
But I dont have an 'income' as such to be able to give 'this much' every month.
I give what have when i have it.
I also dont just go out & spend it on silly things that are of no use.
There are SOME people living well beond what they need in australia, that I'd like to prompt to act.
But I'd also like to ask the goverment a lot of things about where their priorities are at.

At this point though, I think you'll believe whatever you want to believe so it doesnt matter what i say now.
So I will stop.
Leave this conversation here.
Because all you want to do is put me down.
& I will not be.
 
Upvote 0

TheDag

I don't like titles
Jan 8, 2005
9,459
267
✟28,794.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The child sponsorship programs, whether run by World Vision or anyone else, will run less efficently than other programs because there is much more admin required to keep the sponsors involved. But that's not the only aspect of World Visions work and they are very cost effective at delivering programs in the countries in which they operate.
Sorry to quote an old post but I really wanted to say that the other big expense in child sponsorship is keeping track of the child. Often something will happen within a family and the child all of a sudden is whisked away to a relatives house to live with them. In many countries it can make it hard to keep track of the child and continue to help them. Doing so is worthwhile and expensive.
 
Upvote 0

TheDag

I don't like titles
Jan 8, 2005
9,459
267
✟28,794.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I do not believe that it is fair to abuse Australians for not giving through government (with it's higher rates of inefficiency, when they choose rather to give privately and through NGOs.
I didn't see anyone abuse Aussies for not giving through the government. I'm not entirely sure that you can give through the government. He is talking about the amount the government contributes though.

I also believe that it is unfair to ignore the considerable charity given by Australians to those within our own borders. Needy people living in Australia are still needy, and should not be ignored when we're talking about the world's disadvantaged peoples. Nor is there something wrong with looking after your own backyard first. Does no scripture say that someone who did not look after their own is "worse than an unbeliever"?
Yeah your right there is a verse along these lines. In context it says looking after your own family. So then you need to decide who is family. Any money given to drought relief or bushfire appeals is hardly giving to family unless you use the definition of family as illustrated by the Good Samaritan story in which case people overseas are just as much family as people here in Australia. So quoting that verse has no relevance to this discussion.


It is true that the vast majority of long-term poverty is politically driven. Therefore Australia's peace-keeping forces overseas are just as much "aid" as are donations of cash or food. Especially in situations where politics prevent food-aid from reaching those who need it. Do you consider the cost of such peace-keeping?
Do we consider the fact that we provide raw materials that are helping drive the Asian economic boom that is dragging hundreds of millions out of poverty?
Yes sending troops to East Timor was a great idea. Of course maybe if we hadn't turned a blind eye to what the Indonesia government was doing when it invaded the country in the first place. (just like we are basically turning a blind eye to action against PNG)
I could go on and list plenty of other countries where Australia has provided support to and now consider them to be bad governments.

My suggestion to "ChristinAction" is twofold.
(1) Before criticising Australians, consider our whole effect on the world around us .... not just one small subset of it.
I guess you read what you want but it is clear that Christ In Action is talking about government assistance. It is a call to pressure the government to do more than they are now.


(2) Consider carefully before you criticise people who have needs and priorities which you have yet to experience. You say that you don't have "a job",,, but you could be mowing lawns, babysitting or collecting recyclable metals. If you are serious about giving, you'll be doing this - but it will cost you time that you'd rather be spending on other things (like sitting at your computer perhaps.)

There are more than one ways to give...... and more than one way to measure giving.

Peter (25-year volunteer)

Ahh the good old bag people out for being critical of others and then be critical of them only using assumptions. Wrong ones at that. Christ In Action has said he is involved with voluntering time. I guess you just decided to skip over that part of the thread or as I said before you read what you want to read.



After saying all that you do have some good points worth considering.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

TheDag

I don't like titles
Jan 8, 2005
9,459
267
✟28,794.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
However I do object to charities that pay people (usually backpackers) to stand in the shopping centre all day, and try to get people to sign up to monthly donations. I know that I have seen the Red Cross, WWF, the Childrens Fund doing this.
Well I guess the question is what is better. To not use the colectors and get for example $1 million from newspapaer & tv ads or is it better to use the collectors and get the $1 million you get from people who respond to newspaper or tv ads plus $100,000 from the collectors after they have taken their cut? These charities that do use collection contractors do so because they do end up with more money in the end.
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Sorry to quote an old post but I really wanted to say that the other big expense in child sponsorship is keeping track of the child. Often something will happen within a family and the child all of a sudden is whisked away to a relatives house to live with them. In many countries it can make it hard to keep track of the child and continue to help them. Doing so is worthwhile and expensive.
Nods
 
Upvote 0

Cooch

Regular Member
Oct 8, 2006
543
52
Cookardinia
✟15,964.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
I didn't see anyone abuse Aussies for not giving through the government.........I guess you read what you want but it is clear that Christ In Action is talking about government assistance. It is a call to pressure the government to do more than they are now.

I argue that you're not connecting the dots at all. In a democratic country like Australia, "the government" does not act indepemndently of the rest of Australia. It collects taxes and distributes them - sometimes as overseas aid - for the reason that that policy is important to voting Australians. It cannot be argued that Australian government policy in an area like this is "Disgraceful", without implying that the attitude of those who elected that government is likewise "disgraceful". That sounds like abuse to me.

Yeah your right there is a verse along these lines. In context it says looking after your own family. So then you need to decide who is family. Any money given to drought relief or bushfire appeals is hardly giving to family unless you use the definition of family as illustrated by the Good Samaritan story in which case people overseas are just as much family as people here in Australia. So quoting that verse has no relevance to this discussion.
In fact it it quite specifically related to family .... however I can argue that it supports the principle that looking after the needs of those most directly before you is appropriate, and that ignoring these in order to donate to more appealing causes may not be. Point is, it is not "disgraceful" to look after your own first, whether it is your own family or community. What is disgraceful is to ignore those who have a call on you.


Ahh the good old bag people out for being critical of others and then be critical of them only using assumptions. Wrong ones at that. Christ In Action has said he is involved with voluntering time. I guess you just decided to skip over that part of the thread or as I said before you read what you want to read.
Pot calling the kettle ........are we Mr Dag?
I see no reaction from you to the abusive response that CIA gave to a couple of us who disagreed with her. Nor do you bother to point out that in claiming to volunteer time while ignoring the huge contribution that other Australians make in volunteering , she demonstrates further inconsistency.

As for issues like Timor. Well to be consistent, we must acknowledge that an Australian government - one which I despised - permitted its occupation (and that of Dutch New Guinea as it was then) . Point is that that is history, and an error for which we are now paying the price. WE ARE PAYING IT (one of my friends is still carrying shrapnel acquired over there).... and should receive credit for so doing. Same must be said for our contributions in the Solomons, Somalia, A'stan and Iraq. Regardless of what we think of the politics, we did not create the situation in those places and we are contributing to the security and welfare of the inhabitants. People who have little contract with our military personnel have no idea how seriously our men in uniform take that work, and how proud they are of making a contribution.

Talking about overseas aid as it affects children.... it has been argued that one of the drivers behind children being engaged in various forms of sexual exploitation, is the decision by certain "enlightened" countries such as our own, that we will not accept child labour or the products thereof. As much as the need for children to work is to be deplored, it is better to work and contributre to your family, than to starve with them or be sold by them because they cannot afford to keep you. Hobson's choice.

Please consider....... Peter
 
Upvote 0

Cooch

Regular Member
Oct 8, 2006
543
52
Cookardinia
✟15,964.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Talking of Australians doing good things, this crowd are definitely worth supporting. http://http://www.rescuenet.org.au/(Cards on the table, the director is a friend...)

Volunteers providing first-response paramedic relief into disaster areas in the initial stages before government and international aid agencies get organised.
They were into Banda Aceh in Indonesia before the Red Cross and had sourced and were supplying drugs and medical supplies to the Australian Army surgical team that was operating in the same area, while operating their own paramedic services in parrallel.
IIRC, they were probably the first NGO to provide medical services in Iraq after the invasion.

Not so disgraceful.......

Peter
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

TheDag

I don't like titles
Jan 8, 2005
9,459
267
✟28,794.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I argue that you're not connecting the dots at all. In a democratic country like Australia, "the government" does not act indepemndently of the rest of Australia. It collects taxes and distributes them - sometimes as overseas aid - for the reason that that policy is important to voting Australians. It cannot be argued that Australian government policy in an area like this is "Disgraceful", without implying that the attitude of those who elected that government is likewise "disgraceful". That sounds like abuse to me.
You can argue that although I think it is like adding one plus one and getting three. I don't think anything is implied about Aussies by what the government does or does not contribute.



In fact it it quite specifically related to family .... however I can argue that it supports the principle that looking after the needs of those most directly before you is appropriate, and that ignoring these in order to donate to more appealing causes may not be. Point is, it is not "disgraceful" to look after your own first, whether it is your own family or community. What is disgraceful is to ignore those who have a call on you.
I know the verse is specifically related to family. I even acknowledged that. There is not anything however that suggests you should help those who live near you before helping others. The bible is quite clear that everyone is our neighbour and therefore the order is that we should make sure family is provided for and then help neighbours. Neighbours is everyone. I never said it was disgraceful to help people in your own community I was simply saying in response to another poster that there is nothing to justify the view that we must give to our community before overseas.



Pot calling the kettle ........are we Mr Dag?
I see no reaction from you to the abusive response that CIA gave to a couple of us who disagreed with her. Nor do you bother to point out that in claiming to volunteer time while ignoring the huge contribution that other Australians make in volunteering , she demonstrates further inconsistency.
The only response that I noticed was when people were being judgemental and aggresive towards CIA. I agree with CIA that they were wrong. If there is another post you are talking about then my apologies for not noticing and I agree it would be wrong. Do consider that you were being critical of someone for not voluntering when they had already said that they do volunteer time.




As for issues like Timor. Well to be consistent, we must acknowledge that an Australian government - one which I despised - permitted its occupation (and that of Dutch New Guinea as it was then) . Point is that that is history, and an error for which we are now paying the price. WE ARE PAYING IT (one of my friends is still carrying shrapnel acquired over there).... and should receive credit for so doing. Same must be said for our contributions in the Solomons, Somalia, A'stan and Iraq. Regardless of what we think of the politics, we did not create the situation in those places and we are contributing to the security and welfare of the inhabitants. People who have little contract with our military personnel have no idea how seriously our men in uniform take that work, and how proud they are of making a contribution.
There is nothing wrong with them being proud of the contribution. I was simply pointing out that alot of these situations were greatly contibuted towards by various world governments for one simple reason. To ignore what was happening was of greater financial benefit. I think one could argue that we have an obligation to help fix the problem. There is a saying that all that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. So sure we didn't tell indonesia to annexe east timor and kill people who objected but we knew this was happening and did nothing. In africa the problems with civil wars is from when the british and french created the borders of countries. it was a tactic of theirs at the time. Divide and conquer. By drawing up borders which cause tribes that have been fighting for hundreds of years to be in the same country is naturally going to end in civil war. So once again the "west" is greatly responsible for the problems there. Civil war is viewed quite differently than one country invading another. If they had been sensible in drawing up the borders then you would find there would still be hatred but there wouldn't be invading. The civil war of course stops countries from prospering which then makes then more at mercy of countries who put conditions on aid given. For example many muslim countries will give aid as long as laws are passed making christian missionaries illegal.




Talking about overseas aid as it affects children.... it has been argued that one of the drivers behind children being engaged in various forms of sexual exploitation, is the decision by certain "enlightened" countries such as our own, that we will not accept child labour or the products thereof. As much as the need for children to work is to be deplored, it is better to work and contributre to your family, than to starve with them or be sold by them because they cannot afford to keep you. Hobson's choice.

Please consider....... Peter
Yes I am quite aware of this. The leader of the country where NIKE has a factory has said they would be so much worse off if they didn't have that. So while we may see it as a great injustice it is very helpful to the people who live there.
 
Upvote 0