Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
What about the DNA evidence?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justatruthseeker" data-source="post: 64738820" data-attributes="member: 332164"><p>But of course you have nothing to say about the evidence, because we both know it is true. All fossils are the same from the first appearance of a species, until its extinction. Those that survived the extinction event are the same as their fossils. </p><p></p><p>Coelacanth used to be your prime evolutionary fossil between fish and tetrapods, until one was found to still exist exactly as it has always been.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth" target="_blank">Coelacanth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</a></p><p></p><p>"A group led by Chris Amemiya and Neil Shubin published the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_sequence" target="_blank">genome sequence</a> of the coelacanth in the journal <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_%28journal%29" target="_blank">Nature</a></em>. The African coelacanth genome was sequenced and assembled using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA" target="_blank">DNA</a> from a Comoros Islands <em>Latimeria chalumnae</em> specimen. It was sequenced by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illumina_dye_sequencing" target="_blank">Illumina sequencing</a> technology and assembled using the short read genome assembler <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequence_assembly#Available_assemblers" target="_blank">ALLPATHS-LG</a>.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth#cite_note-genome-21" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth#cite_note-genome-21</a></p><p></p><p>The vertebrate land transition is one of the most important steps in our evolutionary history. We conclude that the closest living fish to the tetrapod ancestor is the lungfish, not the coelacanth."</p><p></p><p>But of course we were assured for years that it was a transitory species between fish and tetrapods by evolutionists. Why? Because that is what they wanted it to be. Then we found one and DNA evidence disproved that theory. So basically evolutionists fabricated an entire evolutionary line simply on their desire to attempt to prove this important transitional step completely missing from the fossil record.</p><p></p><p>Darwin found this same missing steps, but convinced everyone to look the other way, that they would be found in the future. Over 100 years later and here we are, still missing these transitional steps.</p><p></p><p>But you will continue to look the other way and assure us that what you claim are transitional are transitional, just like you assured us the Coelacanth was transitional. You were wrong then and are wrong now. It is only too bad we have no living specimens of these other transitional claims to DNA test.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justatruthseeker, post: 64738820, member: 332164"] But of course you have nothing to say about the evidence, because we both know it is true. All fossils are the same from the first appearance of a species, until its extinction. Those that survived the extinction event are the same as their fossils. Coelacanth used to be your prime evolutionary fossil between fish and tetrapods, until one was found to still exist exactly as it has always been. [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth]Coelacanth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url] "A group led by Chris Amemiya and Neil Shubin published the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_sequence"]genome sequence[/URL] of the coelacanth in the journal [I][URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_%28journal%29"]Nature[/URL][/I]. The African coelacanth genome was sequenced and assembled using [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA"]DNA[/URL] from a Comoros Islands [I]Latimeria chalumnae[/I] specimen. It was sequenced by [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illumina_dye_sequencing"]Illumina sequencing[/URL] technology and assembled using the short read genome assembler [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequence_assembly#Available_assemblers"]ALLPATHS-LG[/URL].[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth#cite_note-genome-21"][/URL] The vertebrate land transition is one of the most important steps in our evolutionary history. We conclude that the closest living fish to the tetrapod ancestor is the lungfish, not the coelacanth." But of course we were assured for years that it was a transitory species between fish and tetrapods by evolutionists. Why? Because that is what they wanted it to be. Then we found one and DNA evidence disproved that theory. So basically evolutionists fabricated an entire evolutionary line simply on their desire to attempt to prove this important transitional step completely missing from the fossil record. Darwin found this same missing steps, but convinced everyone to look the other way, that they would be found in the future. Over 100 years later and here we are, still missing these transitional steps. But you will continue to look the other way and assure us that what you claim are transitional are transitional, just like you assured us the Coelacanth was transitional. You were wrong then and are wrong now. It is only too bad we have no living specimens of these other transitional claims to DNA test. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
What about the DNA evidence?
Top
Bottom