Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Virgin at 18? Here's a Big Payoff!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sycophant" data-source="post: 15761565" data-attributes="member: 28811"><p>It's been pointed out earlier, but I will do it again... </p><p></p><p>There is nothing in the study (that I can see) that show that the lack of sexual activity is the cause of this.</p><p></p><p>Also, they did better in the three factors mentioned (although I'm not even sure about one of them, what does a "had about half the risk of divorce" mean anyway?).</p><p></p><p>So, what about other factors?</p><p></p><p>Also, what if instead of the age at which they had sex, we find another random variable to group them by? Perhaps those with longer hair did better? Or maybe it was those who wore bright colours more often? </p><p></p><p>In fact, if you take any group, split it in half, and then focus on one group, it's pretty certain that you will find things that group does better than the other group (the very nature of statistics kind of assures this).</p><p></p><p>This is a totally meaningless study as far as I can tell.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sycophant, post: 15761565, member: 28811"] It's been pointed out earlier, but I will do it again... There is nothing in the study (that I can see) that show that the lack of sexual activity is the cause of this. Also, they did better in the three factors mentioned (although I'm not even sure about one of them, what does a "had about half the risk of divorce" mean anyway?). So, what about other factors? Also, what if instead of the age at which they had sex, we find another random variable to group them by? Perhaps those with longer hair did better? Or maybe it was those who wore bright colours more often? In fact, if you take any group, split it in half, and then focus on one group, it's pretty certain that you will find things that group does better than the other group (the very nature of statistics kind of assures this). This is a totally meaningless study as far as I can tell. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Virgin at 18? Here's a Big Payoff!
Top
Bottom