Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
The War on the Boy Scouts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IzzyPop" data-source="post: 42154492" data-attributes="member: 190894"><p>Nope. Most of the info I posted originally came from Wikipedia. I had a nice chuckle when you posted the page as a counter to what I had stated.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No. But it shows, once again, that separate but equal does not work. Here is another example. Vermont allows civil unions between same sex couples. Everything a marriage allows except for the name, right? Wrong. UPS almost went to court because they were stating that the federal law governing spousal insurance coverage specifically stated 'spouses', which means marriage, not civil unions. The only reason it did not ht the courts was the outcry from the shipping public that promised they would take their business to FedEx.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IzzyPop, post: 42154492, member: 190894"] Nope. Most of the info I posted originally came from Wikipedia. I had a nice chuckle when you posted the page as a counter to what I had stated. No. But it shows, once again, that separate but equal does not work. Here is another example. Vermont allows civil unions between same sex couples. Everything a marriage allows except for the name, right? Wrong. UPS almost went to court because they were stating that the federal law governing spousal insurance coverage specifically stated 'spouses', which means marriage, not civil unions. The only reason it did not ht the courts was the outcry from the shipping public that promised they would take their business to FedEx. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
The War on the Boy Scouts
Top
Bottom