Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
The new GOP Bill. "Protect Life Act"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lawtonfogle" data-source="post: 56764832" data-attributes="member: 108642"><p>I see that it can be removed. If it can be removed without killing it (such as most later third term babies), then killing it should be murder. I support technology to be able to remove the baby even earlier without killing it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If a woman consents to sex, but half way through says no, it is rape to continue.</p><p></p><p>The big catch is with children, who by law cannot consent to anyone using their body. If a child gets pregnant, the courts should require them to get an abortion ASAP (unless they are emancipated, say via marriage).</p><p></p><p></p><p>If Jill consents to sex with Bob, Joe still can't touch Jill.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Ignorance is no excuse. Also, consent to sex does not equate consent to all actions that derive thereof.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lawtonfogle, post: 56764832, member: 108642"] I see that it can be removed. If it can be removed without killing it (such as most later third term babies), then killing it should be murder. I support technology to be able to remove the baby even earlier without killing it. If a woman consents to sex, but half way through says no, it is rape to continue. The big catch is with children, who by law cannot consent to anyone using their body. If a child gets pregnant, the courts should require them to get an abortion ASAP (unless they are emancipated, say via marriage). If Jill consents to sex with Bob, Joe still can't touch Jill. Ignorance is no excuse. Also, consent to sex does not equate consent to all actions that derive thereof. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
The new GOP Bill. "Protect Life Act"
Top
Bottom