Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Sen. Diane Feinstein to Introduce Gun Control Bill
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quincunx" data-source="post: 61996096" data-attributes="member: 316372"><p>But he didn't. In fact there are vanishingly few cases where someone sets out to murder tens of people by running them over in a car. But we now have case after case after case where guns were used. Guns also work at <em>distances</em>, cars not so much.</p><p> </p><p>So, again, <strong>what's the answer?</strong> No more "excuses" as to how this or that <em>could have been</em>, what's the answer?</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Again, rather different from guns, and again, almost no cases of this happening (because it would be harder than killing lots of people with a <strong>gun</strong>.)</p><p> </p><p>What's the answer?</p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Unlikely he would have been able to kill as many as quickly, so again, different. And, of course, that isn't what usually happens in these spree killings now, is it? </p><p> </p><p>So what's the answer?</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>And you don't have to know much of <em>anything</em> about anatomy to make an efficient killing with a gun.</p><p> </p><p>What's the answer?</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>So is that the answer? MORE GUNS? Just commit to an answer! Maybe people can try it out.</p><p> </p><p>But we need an <strong>answer</strong>.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Indeed! So we can't really use mental illness factors as indicative of gun violence. </p><p> </p><p>But guns are <em>100% present in all cases of gun-violence</em>.</p><p> </p><p>If only there was some way to ensure that gun violence was <em>less</em> common. Maybe it's <strong>more guns?</strong></p><p> </p><p>What's the answer?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quincunx, post: 61996096, member: 316372"] But he didn't. In fact there are vanishingly few cases where someone sets out to murder tens of people by running them over in a car. But we now have case after case after case where guns were used. Guns also work at [I]distances[/I], cars not so much. So, again, [B]what's the answer?[/B] No more "excuses" as to how this or that [I]could have been[/I], what's the answer? Again, rather different from guns, and again, almost no cases of this happening (because it would be harder than killing lots of people with a [B]gun[/B].) What's the answer? Unlikely he would have been able to kill as many as quickly, so again, different. And, of course, that isn't what usually happens in these spree killings now, is it? So what's the answer? And you don't have to know much of [I]anything[/I] about anatomy to make an efficient killing with a gun. What's the answer? So is that the answer? MORE GUNS? Just commit to an answer! Maybe people can try it out. But we need an [B]answer[/B]. Indeed! So we can't really use mental illness factors as indicative of gun violence. But guns are [I]100% present in all cases of gun-violence[/I]. If only there was some way to ensure that gun violence was [I]less[/I] common. Maybe it's [B]more guns?[/B] What's the answer? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Sen. Diane Feinstein to Introduce Gun Control Bill
Top
Bottom