Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Responding to Justa's Comments On Evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DogmaHunter" data-source="post: 68407981" data-attributes="member: 346237"><p>That is what people call "analogies".</p><p></p><p>It's not <em>actual</em> code as in .NET or C++</p><p></p><p>It's just molecules engaged in a gigantic chemical reaction that works in an orderly fashion - but again merely follows the laws of physics and chemistry.</p><p></p><p>It's easy to draw analogies to some batch software routine. And people do that to make it easier to understand the big picture.</p><p>Also note that I said "batch software". It's a sequential "instruction set". It's not analogous to object orientation or any other advanced software engineering paradigm.</p><p></p><p>But saying that because we can draw an analogy from Y to X, it means that Y and X <em>are the same thing</em>.... Surely you would agree that that is nonsense, right? ........right?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DogmaHunter, post: 68407981, member: 346237"] That is what people call "analogies". It's not [I]actual[/I] code as in .NET or C++ It's just molecules engaged in a gigantic chemical reaction that works in an orderly fashion - but again merely follows the laws of physics and chemistry. It's easy to draw analogies to some batch software routine. And people do that to make it easier to understand the big picture. Also note that I said "batch software". It's a sequential "instruction set". It's not analogous to object orientation or any other advanced software engineering paradigm. But saying that because we can draw an analogy from Y to X, it means that Y and X [I]are the same thing[/I].... Surely you would agree that that is nonsense, right? ........right? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Responding to Justa's Comments On Evolution
Top
Bottom