Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Redshift, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, etc., etc.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 68093772" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>I think it's amazing that their models do not predict the presence of polarized light. They really don't understand plasma physics very well.</p><p></p><p>I'd also caution you in terms of not going too far in the opposite direction with respect to gravity. While the mainstream tends to use gravity like a sledge hammer, and they tend to see everything through the rose colored glasses of gravity, the EU/PC community tends to attempt to do away with gravity entirely, or they immediately try to explain gravity as an EM field effect. In the end that may proven to be true of course, but it's not necessarily helpful to take things to the opposite extreme IMO. I think it's fine to use GR and gravity to explain the things that gravity explains best, namely the orbits of planets in a solar system, and it's influence on galaxy rotation patterns, and galaxy cluster formations. I don't think gravity explains solar flares or aurora, or other very "electrically driven" processes even inside our solar system, but it does serve a purpose in astronomy. Whether we agree on a theory or everything, I think you'd agree that we all experience gravity. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Likewise we all know that electricity exists on planet Earth. How those two things apply to other bodies in space remains under debate, but both gravity and EM fields show up in experiments on Earth. Whatever gravity might be, it's effect on me while sitting in this chair is pretty undeniable. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 68093772, member: 627"] I think it's amazing that their models do not predict the presence of polarized light. They really don't understand plasma physics very well. I'd also caution you in terms of not going too far in the opposite direction with respect to gravity. While the mainstream tends to use gravity like a sledge hammer, and they tend to see everything through the rose colored glasses of gravity, the EU/PC community tends to attempt to do away with gravity entirely, or they immediately try to explain gravity as an EM field effect. In the end that may proven to be true of course, but it's not necessarily helpful to take things to the opposite extreme IMO. I think it's fine to use GR and gravity to explain the things that gravity explains best, namely the orbits of planets in a solar system, and it's influence on galaxy rotation patterns, and galaxy cluster formations. I don't think gravity explains solar flares or aurora, or other very "electrically driven" processes even inside our solar system, but it does serve a purpose in astronomy. Whether we agree on a theory or everything, I think you'd agree that we all experience gravity. :) Likewise we all know that electricity exists on planet Earth. How those two things apply to other bodies in space remains under debate, but both gravity and EM fields show up in experiments on Earth. Whatever gravity might be, it's effect on me while sitting in this chair is pretty undeniable. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Redshift, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, etc., etc.
Top
Bottom