Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Redshift, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, etc., etc.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justatruthseeker" data-source="post: 68092128" data-attributes="member: 332164"><p>That claim is the same as the neutron being electrically neutral. Utterly worthless. You just can't measure it.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron</a></p><p></p><p>"The Standard Model of particle physics predicts a tiny separation of positive and negative charge within the neutron leading to a permanent electric dipole moment. The predicted value is, however, well below the current sensitivity of experiments."</p><p></p><p>So tell me why I should expect to be able to measure the electric dipole moment of the nuetrino when we can't even yet measure the neutron? Neutrinos more than likely exist and if they do, they have an electric dipole moment, just below the current sensitivity of experiments.</p><p></p><p>I'm simply asking you to accept what is believed when that same theory has met every test, unlike some which can't even pass the first one.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/supersymmetry-fails-test-forcing-physics-seek-new-idea/" target="_blank">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/supersymmetry-fails-test-forcing-physics-seek-new-idea/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justatruthseeker, post: 68092128, member: 332164"] That claim is the same as the neutron being electrically neutral. Utterly worthless. You just can't measure it. [URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron[/URL] "The Standard Model of particle physics predicts a tiny separation of positive and negative charge within the neutron leading to a permanent electric dipole moment. The predicted value is, however, well below the current sensitivity of experiments." So tell me why I should expect to be able to measure the electric dipole moment of the nuetrino when we can't even yet measure the neutron? Neutrinos more than likely exist and if they do, they have an electric dipole moment, just below the current sensitivity of experiments. I'm simply asking you to accept what is believed when that same theory has met every test, unlike some which can't even pass the first one. [URL]http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/supersymmetry-fails-test-forcing-physics-seek-new-idea/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Redshift, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, etc., etc.
Top
Bottom