Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Redshift, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, etc., etc.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justatruthseeker" data-source="post: 67526052" data-attributes="member: 332164"><p>More dogma's in astronomy slowly falling away.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150411091607.htm" target="_blank">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150411091607.htm</a></p><p></p><p>So things may not be as far as we believed, which means redhsift certainly isn't a velocity and distance indicator as currently believed. Which may mean there isn't as much dark energy - which of course does away with more dark matter. And shouldn't the sizes of black holes and numbers also go down - since not as much mass is now needed to counteract the absent dark energy. And the now absent dark matter as well?</p><p></p><p>But rest assured - even if they have been wrong for the last 80 years, this time they for sure got it right.</p><p></p><p>Or on to the next paradigm.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/" target="_blank">http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justatruthseeker, post: 67526052, member: 332164"] More dogma's in astronomy slowly falling away. [URL]http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150411091607.htm[/URL] So things may not be as far as we believed, which means redhsift certainly isn't a velocity and distance indicator as currently believed. Which may mean there isn't as much dark energy - which of course does away with more dark matter. And shouldn't the sizes of black holes and numbers also go down - since not as much mass is now needed to counteract the absent dark energy. And the now absent dark matter as well? But rest assured - even if they have been wrong for the last 80 years, this time they for sure got it right. Or on to the next paradigm. [URL]http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Redshift, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, etc., etc.
Top
Bottom