• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Preference between less at a rate, and less at a consistent rate - is exponentially sub-motivational

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
Hi there,

Preference between less at a rate (in connection with for example, less kingly association) and less at a consistent rate (because of difference (give or take distraction) between less and less over entropy)) - (as is presumed a best case scenario for adaptionless ending) _-_ is exponentially sub-motivational.

In other words, as much as you might like to believe in Evolution without writing it or saying it more consistently over time, in the end the possibility of it meaning anything other than total depression or immediate and permanent retraction in the attempt to remember as much of the past as possible, is 0.

Under such conditions, no work is possible unless hitherto and forthwith all connections, associations or extensions to are ignored.

_

There is no possibility of payment of any kind under such circumstances.

_

_

Short of explaining why it could not be defined as such by those promoting or building on the possibility of this being a foundation - related to the principle of one sustainment more or less related to another, through energy as voiced (in a best case scenario) - and freely no matter how extensively connected or related to science, as if only ever to do with forgiveness and anything based on it - is probably going to be a liability for any one espousing it whether failingly or less correctly for all time.