Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
No-Knock Warrant Results in Death of Minneapolis Man
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rjs330" data-source="post: 76538439" data-attributes="member: 377008"><p>I'm really not all that for no knock warrants. Citizens have a right to protect themselves.</p><p></p><p>I think we conservatives have to be better at understanding the issues here. We support castle doctrines and a person's right to defend themselves, their families and their home. If an intruder breaks into your home at night particularly you have a right to assume it's dangerous and can respond with a gun. </p><p></p><p>If the police break into you home at night without knocking and announcing and do it so quickly that you don't have enough time to process what's happening I can see why you'd pull a gun. </p><p></p><p>Just as we give police the right to try and make a deadly decision within a matter of a second or less, we have to give the citizen the same rights. In fact maybe even longer, cause they are not trained to see, determine a threat and act as fast as police are. </p><p></p><p>So, I'm not in favor of the no knock warrant as we have it right now. </p><p></p><p>I don't know about this case, but no knocks need to be reserved for cases where the police have probable cause that the person is armed and dangerous and reserved for crimes of violence. </p><p></p><p>I don't think they should be gotten rid of completely because there are certainly times lik I mentioned where they would be needed.</p><p></p><p>Drug crimes or arrest warrants for crimes of non-violence should not be reasons for no knock warrants.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rjs330, post: 76538439, member: 377008"] I'm really not all that for no knock warrants. Citizens have a right to protect themselves. I think we conservatives have to be better at understanding the issues here. We support castle doctrines and a person's right to defend themselves, their families and their home. If an intruder breaks into your home at night particularly you have a right to assume it's dangerous and can respond with a gun. If the police break into you home at night without knocking and announcing and do it so quickly that you don't have enough time to process what's happening I can see why you'd pull a gun. Just as we give police the right to try and make a deadly decision within a matter of a second or less, we have to give the citizen the same rights. In fact maybe even longer, cause they are not trained to see, determine a threat and act as fast as police are. So, I'm not in favor of the no knock warrant as we have it right now. I don't know about this case, but no knocks need to be reserved for cases where the police have probable cause that the person is armed and dangerous and reserved for crimes of violence. I don't think they should be gotten rid of completely because there are certainly times lik I mentioned where they would be needed. Drug crimes or arrest warrants for crimes of non-violence should not be reasons for no knock warrants. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
No-Knock Warrant Results in Death of Minneapolis Man
Top
Bottom