Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
New Link in Human Evolution: Homo Naledi
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Loudmouth" data-source="post: 68637231" data-attributes="member: 11790"><p>The process involves heredity which means that you need to define the genetic relationships between the species you are asking about.</p><p></p><p>What are those relationships?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You already shot that down when you wouldn't allow us to include common ancestry. You need to make up your mind. Common ancestry is part of the process of evolution. If you won't allow us to include it, then it is you who is stopping us from giving you the explanation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Every time I bring up the process you ignore it.</p><p></p><p>"<strong><em>The how</em></strong> is random mutations filtered through natural selection. This scientific theory makes a specific and testable hypothesis, that we should see a difference in the rate of accumulation of mutations in different parts of the genome. Specifically, we should see conservation of functional DNA sequences. That is exactly what we see. When we compare the chimp and human genomes we see the conservation of sequence in human and chimp genes compared to junk DNA."--post #310</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Loudmouth, post: 68637231, member: 11790"] The process involves heredity which means that you need to define the genetic relationships between the species you are asking about. What are those relationships? You already shot that down when you wouldn't allow us to include common ancestry. You need to make up your mind. Common ancestry is part of the process of evolution. If you won't allow us to include it, then it is you who is stopping us from giving you the explanation. Every time I bring up the process you ignore it. "[B][I]The how[/I][/B] is random mutations filtered through natural selection. This scientific theory makes a specific and testable hypothesis, that we should see a difference in the rate of accumulation of mutations in different parts of the genome. Specifically, we should see conservation of functional DNA sequences. That is exactly what we see. When we compare the chimp and human genomes we see the conservation of sequence in human and chimp genes compared to junk DNA."--post #310 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
New Link in Human Evolution: Homo Naledi
Top
Bottom