Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Legal To Shoot Radio Stunt Participants?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheRedFox" data-source="post: 17682325" data-attributes="member: 116241"><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="color: darkred">Whenever <em>threatened</em>? On what basis? Where's the line drawn? I can think of an example that happened here in California. Someone felt <em>threatened</em> because someone was tailgating their car. So what happened? They shot them - one shot behind their car and they killed the tailgating driver instantly. Was this justified - at least, in Florida? Where next? I agree with you Dale, there's a hungry lion just waiting to be let out of its cage.</span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="color: darkred"><span style="color: darkred">A good quoth to digest: <em>"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States." </em>Noah Webster, "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal States, at 56 (New York, 1888).</span></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheRedFox, post: 17682325, member: 116241"] [font=Times New Roman][color=darkred]Whenever [i]threatened[/i]? On what basis? Where's the line drawn? I can think of an example that happened here in California. Someone felt [i]threatened[/i] because someone was tailgating their car. So what happened? They shot them - one shot behind their car and they killed the tailgating driver instantly. Was this justified - at least, in Florida? Where next? I agree with you Dale, there's a hungry lion just waiting to be let out of its cage.[/color][/font] [font=Times New Roman][color=darkred][color=darkred]A good quoth to digest: [i]"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States." [/i]Noah Webster, "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal States, at 56 (New York, 1888).[/color][/color][/font] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Legal To Shoot Radio Stunt Participants?
Top
Bottom