Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
It costs over 100x more than the spy balloon to shoot it down!! x_x
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="timewerx" data-source="post: 77140558" data-attributes="member: 314730"><p>For now.</p><p></p><p>But eventually, they need to figure out a way to make it cheaper to bring down balloons. A high interception / defense cost is a weakness and apparently, the Russians have learned to exploit in the Ukraine war.</p><p></p><p>Even China can exploit the weakness to a greater effect by sending swarms of balloons that is designed to look like spy or science research balloons with a payload of inert junk/defective electronics (basically garbage electronics). These balloons will be dirt cheap. You won't realize the Chinese are loading them up with $0 of defective garbage electronics since any defect found in the payload can also be caused by violent forces such missile explosion or impact with the ground.</p><p></p><p>It's not good forward thinking for the armed to not care about improving efficiency and cost effectiveness of their defensive suite. They'd be diverting precious tax payer money that could have been used to offset healthcare or educational costs for example. An expensive army is also an exploitable weakness as we're starting to see in the Ukraine war and NATO's dealings with cheap UFO's.</p><p></p><p>What's next? Russia could even begin sending fake trucks and fake tanks or ground mobile suicide drones disguised as civilian cars, etc just to force NATO to commit large amount of resources on their super expensive defensive suites.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="timewerx, post: 77140558, member: 314730"] For now. But eventually, they need to figure out a way to make it cheaper to bring down balloons. A high interception / defense cost is a weakness and apparently, the Russians have learned to exploit in the Ukraine war. Even China can exploit the weakness to a greater effect by sending swarms of balloons that is designed to look like spy or science research balloons with a payload of inert junk/defective electronics (basically garbage electronics). These balloons will be dirt cheap. You won't realize the Chinese are loading them up with $0 of defective garbage electronics since any defect found in the payload can also be caused by violent forces such missile explosion or impact with the ground. It's not good forward thinking for the armed to not care about improving efficiency and cost effectiveness of their defensive suite. They'd be diverting precious tax payer money that could have been used to offset healthcare or educational costs for example. An expensive army is also an exploitable weakness as we're starting to see in the Ukraine war and NATO's dealings with cheap UFO's. What's next? Russia could even begin sending fake trucks and fake tanks or ground mobile suicide drones disguised as civilian cars, etc just to force NATO to commit large amount of resources on their super expensive defensive suites. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
It costs over 100x more than the spy balloon to shoot it down!! x_x
Top
Bottom