Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Is global warming just another End-of-the-World delusion?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justatruthseeker" data-source="post: 63487713" data-attributes="member: 332164"><p>And yet a new energy source discovered pumping energy into the Earth's atmosphere, and you and I both know that is not included in any calculations. Perhaps you should make it part of your area, since everything is apparently connected throughout space. You can ignore one area of science all you like, but trying to explain Earth weather without taking the Sun into account is pretty useless. Ignoring an energy source would be no different than ignoring the oceans and how they affect climate. The Sun is the most important part of the calculations since it is the main source of heat for the earth. So apparently with a new source of energy, more experiments need conducted to see how it affects Earth's weather. We already know it causes huge substorms in Earth's upper atmosphere, dumping the power of a 5.5 magnitude earthquake into the atmosphere in a matter of seconds. Can you really honestly tell me this energy source does not matter in global warming calculations? These events are going off all the time, everyday, 24 hours a day, 7 days a weeks, 52 weeks a year. The energy contribution to Earth's atmosphere is enormous. You might want to check into that.</p><p></p><p>And yes, man has contributed a lot of pollution to the equation, but we don't understand all the parameters enough at the present to make any definitive conclusions. We can ASSUME things, but we can't KNOW for sure until we understand it all. Man was not producing pollution when the ice age ended, so apparently the Earth cools and heats up without help from man in cycles. This is not to say man is not speeding this cycle up, but there are too many variables that are still yet unknown to claim fact.</p><p></p><p>It is indisputable these currents exist between the sun and Earth, and that they have not been included in any calculations. And I know you haven't included them because mainstream is still waffling over their cause and how much energy they pump into the atmosphere. They are still doing whatever they can to avoid electrical explanations for the event.</p><p></p><p>So if you want to say that you *believe* man is responsible for the climate change, fine, just don't pretend its fact, too many variables have been left out to claim it as fact.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justatruthseeker, post: 63487713, member: 332164"] And yet a new energy source discovered pumping energy into the Earth's atmosphere, and you and I both know that is not included in any calculations. Perhaps you should make it part of your area, since everything is apparently connected throughout space. You can ignore one area of science all you like, but trying to explain Earth weather without taking the Sun into account is pretty useless. Ignoring an energy source would be no different than ignoring the oceans and how they affect climate. The Sun is the most important part of the calculations since it is the main source of heat for the earth. So apparently with a new source of energy, more experiments need conducted to see how it affects Earth's weather. We already know it causes huge substorms in Earth's upper atmosphere, dumping the power of a 5.5 magnitude earthquake into the atmosphere in a matter of seconds. Can you really honestly tell me this energy source does not matter in global warming calculations? These events are going off all the time, everyday, 24 hours a day, 7 days a weeks, 52 weeks a year. The energy contribution to Earth's atmosphere is enormous. You might want to check into that. And yes, man has contributed a lot of pollution to the equation, but we don't understand all the parameters enough at the present to make any definitive conclusions. We can ASSUME things, but we can't KNOW for sure until we understand it all. Man was not producing pollution when the ice age ended, so apparently the Earth cools and heats up without help from man in cycles. This is not to say man is not speeding this cycle up, but there are too many variables that are still yet unknown to claim fact. It is indisputable these currents exist between the sun and Earth, and that they have not been included in any calculations. And I know you haven't included them because mainstream is still waffling over their cause and how much energy they pump into the atmosphere. They are still doing whatever they can to avoid electrical explanations for the event. So if you want to say that you *believe* man is responsible for the climate change, fine, just don't pretend its fact, too many variables have been left out to claim it as fact. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Is global warming just another End-of-the-World delusion?
Top
Bottom