Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Is global warming just another End-of-the-World delusion?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lucy Stulz" data-source="post: 63320300" data-attributes="member: 328376"><p>LOL!</p><p></p><p>I showed you an example in which I found that <strong><em><span style="color: Red">DECREASING EVERY HIT COUNT FOR ONLY ONE CLASS (CE in my example) AND STILL SHOWED THAT A STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE WAS STILL MAINTAINED</span></em></strong>.</p><p></p><p>So far you've presented 3 whole examples of people with potentially inflated "hit counts" </p><p></p><p>You have 817 members of the "CE" class. Each one has a number of "references". </p><p></p><p>The statistics rest on how big the difference is between the two groups.</p><p></p><p>This is something you should be able to clearly show to be flawed IF IT IS.</p><p></p><p>(Don't worry, like many Creationist-type debates, I am under no illusion that you will be willing to push one button on a calculator in defense of your "doubt gambit"...ironically enough you are the "computer expert" here. And mathematical analysis will fall out of your posts other than <em><strong>anecdotal post counts for individuals</strong></em>.</p><p></p><p>And again, the statistics are more robust than that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lucy Stulz, post: 63320300, member: 328376"] LOL! I showed you an example in which I found that [B][I][COLOR="Red"]DECREASING EVERY HIT COUNT FOR ONLY ONE CLASS (CE in my example) AND STILL SHOWED THAT A STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE WAS STILL MAINTAINED[/COLOR][/I][/B]. So far you've presented 3 whole examples of people with potentially inflated "hit counts" You have 817 members of the "CE" class. Each one has a number of "references". The statistics rest on how big the difference is between the two groups. This is something you should be able to clearly show to be flawed IF IT IS. (Don't worry, like many Creationist-type debates, I am under no illusion that you will be willing to push one button on a calculator in defense of your "doubt gambit"...ironically enough you are the "computer expert" here. And mathematical analysis will fall out of your posts other than [I][B]anecdotal post counts for individuals[/B][/I]. And again, the statistics are more robust than that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Is global warming just another End-of-the-World delusion?
Top
Bottom