Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Is global warming just another End-of-the-World delusion?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lucy Stulz" data-source="post: 63300660" data-attributes="member: 328376"><p>PopTech insists everyone pay attention to his questions. If you fail to answer even one he will go on about it in big red letters.</p><p></p><p>So here's a challenge to PopTech:</p><p></p><p>1. Re-run the analysis showing how LITTLE ROBUSTNESS shows up in the Anderegg et al. analyses! It should be easy if there is such a horrible error that the Mann-Whitney U-test p-value can be easily shifted to non-significance.</p><p></p><p>2. Show, using a CITATION analysis how "Skeptical" positions are EASILY as well cited and show as much credibility in the scientific community as the "CE" group (again all you need do is shift the p-value on the Mann-Whitney U-test!)</p><p></p><p>Easy, right? You can even use a better search engine than Google Scholar. I'd recommend SciVerse (SCOPUS) or any of the other professional science searching sites!</p><p></p><p>LOL!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lucy Stulz, post: 63300660, member: 328376"] PopTech insists everyone pay attention to his questions. If you fail to answer even one he will go on about it in big red letters. So here's a challenge to PopTech: 1. Re-run the analysis showing how LITTLE ROBUSTNESS shows up in the Anderegg et al. analyses! It should be easy if there is such a horrible error that the Mann-Whitney U-test p-value can be easily shifted to non-significance. 2. Show, using a CITATION analysis how "Skeptical" positions are EASILY as well cited and show as much credibility in the scientific community as the "CE" group (again all you need do is shift the p-value on the Mann-Whitney U-test!) Easy, right? You can even use a better search engine than Google Scholar. I'd recommend SciVerse (SCOPUS) or any of the other professional science searching sites! LOL! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Is global warming just another End-of-the-World delusion?
Top
Bottom