Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
Intelligent Design/Fine Tuning Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Question.Everything" data-source="post: 60847937"><p>On the contrary, the more we learn about the brain provides more and more evidence that thoughts are material. Did you know that we are beginning to actually see images of peoples' thoughts just from brain scanning?</p><p></p><p><a href="http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2011/09/22/brain-movies/" target="_blank">Scientists use brain imaging to reveal the movies in our mind</a></p><p> </p><p>Now, this does not mean we're at the point of absolutely proving that thoughts are material, but it does show us that there is evidence that they are material. Just like in your sense, to me it's common sense that thoughts are material. So we look at the evidence to come to our conclusions.</p><p></p><p>So I'll stand by my original statement that we can see no examples of immaterial things even existing, more so having power on the material.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>It was introduced because it is at least <em>possible</em>, even if improbable. If it is at least possible panspermia is true, it is impossible to say that you know Christian God created life.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Logic does not prove that you exist; you do not know you exist because of logic. You know you exist because you're able to interact with the world and experience it, and then reflect on that experience (logically sometimes). You can use logic to deduce that you exist, but the actual experience of existing is what proves it to you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Question.Everything, post: 60847937"] On the contrary, the more we learn about the brain provides more and more evidence that thoughts are material. Did you know that we are beginning to actually see images of peoples' thoughts just from brain scanning? [url=http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2011/09/22/brain-movies/]Scientists use brain imaging to reveal the movies in our mind[/url] Now, this does not mean we're at the point of absolutely proving that thoughts are material, but it does show us that there is evidence that they are material. Just like in your sense, to me it's common sense that thoughts are material. So we look at the evidence to come to our conclusions. So I'll stand by my original statement that we can see no examples of immaterial things even existing, more so having power on the material. It was introduced because it is at least [i]possible[/i], even if improbable. If it is at least possible panspermia is true, it is impossible to say that you know Christian God created life. Logic does not prove that you exist; you do not know you exist because of logic. You know you exist because you're able to interact with the world and experience it, and then reflect on that experience (logically sometimes). You can use logic to deduce that you exist, but the actual experience of existing is what proves it to you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
Intelligent Design/Fine Tuning Question
Top
Bottom