Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Has anyone noticed the times Russia has taken land from Ukraine?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Larniavc" data-source="post: 77054570" data-attributes="member: 378863"><p>I don’t think that you are facing reality, here. Russian military doctrine is apparently to bomb civilians and infrastructure until the population capitulates. Then send in ground forces. </p><p></p><p>Russia has shown no ability to use a combined arms strategy with any fines. The Wagner Group appears to function independently of the Russian chain of command. </p><p></p><p>Russia users a meat grinder strategy: throw poorly trained and equipped young men to their deaths against a highly motivated, better equipped often NATO doctrine trained force. </p><p></p><p>Most of the elite trained and equipped soldiers of the Russian invasion force are dead. They died in the first attempt to deep strike Ukraine. They are gone. About 20 Russian generals are dead. That’s astounding. Why? Because typically you leave tactical decisions to the field officers and NCOs. </p><p></p><p>But that is not how Russian doctrine goes: they don’t trust the lower ranks. Russian military service is brutal and breeds brutal soldiers or it breaks them. This is part of the reason moral is so low for the average Russian conscript. </p><p></p><p>And that conscript is typically not from metropolitan areas in Russia but from the poorly resourced areas with ethnicities Russia has long neglected. </p><p></p><p>So those poor guys get bussed to a field, get five barely functional equipment, shelter, out of date food and are told to wait- sometimes for weeks. </p><p></p><p>Then they get bussed to the front to be hurled at the enemy: by which time they are already, exhausted, demoralised and alcohol dependent and they get killed by a drone they never see or a NATO trained enemy that has night vision, body armour and working comms devices following combined arms integrated orders. </p><p></p><p>Russia can’t even combine artillery with ground assault: that’s why the Ukrainians getting hold of Patriot MDS will be the death knell for Russia as it’s military doctrine relies on it being able to pummel cities (even to the extent of ignoring military targets). </p><p></p><p>Do you see now?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Larniavc, post: 77054570, member: 378863"] I don’t think that you are facing reality, here. Russian military doctrine is apparently to bomb civilians and infrastructure until the population capitulates. Then send in ground forces. Russia has shown no ability to use a combined arms strategy with any fines. The Wagner Group appears to function independently of the Russian chain of command. Russia users a meat grinder strategy: throw poorly trained and equipped young men to their deaths against a highly motivated, better equipped often NATO doctrine trained force. Most of the elite trained and equipped soldiers of the Russian invasion force are dead. They died in the first attempt to deep strike Ukraine. They are gone. About 20 Russian generals are dead. That’s astounding. Why? Because typically you leave tactical decisions to the field officers and NCOs. But that is not how Russian doctrine goes: they don’t trust the lower ranks. Russian military service is brutal and breeds brutal soldiers or it breaks them. This is part of the reason moral is so low for the average Russian conscript. And that conscript is typically not from metropolitan areas in Russia but from the poorly resourced areas with ethnicities Russia has long neglected. So those poor guys get bussed to a field, get five barely functional equipment, shelter, out of date food and are told to wait- sometimes for weeks. Then they get bussed to the front to be hurled at the enemy: by which time they are already, exhausted, demoralised and alcohol dependent and they get killed by a drone they never see or a NATO trained enemy that has night vision, body armour and working comms devices following combined arms integrated orders. Russia can’t even combine artillery with ground assault: that’s why the Ukrainians getting hold of Patriot MDS will be the death knell for Russia as it’s military doctrine relies on it being able to pummel cities (even to the extent of ignoring military targets). Do you see now? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Has anyone noticed the times Russia has taken land from Ukraine?
Top
Bottom