Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Gorilla Genome
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mark kennedy" data-source="post: 67195845" data-attributes="member: 29337"><p>Actually the early estimates were some 30,000 protein coding genes, the number finally fell below 20,000. The functional part of the genome is considerably larger and an enormous of RNA molecular mechanisms that can be coding about anywhere. There are molecular mechanisms that are involved in adaptive evolution but Darwinians don't want to admit it because that would suggest divine providence. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I used to go on AIG regularly and when I started these debates I absolutely loved Apologetics Press. I had always favored Paleontology but the genetics stuff is so compelling and there is so much material available genomics seemed the best way to go. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I remember I thought that has to be nonsense and as it turned out it was. There for a while people were saying that we should only worry about protein coding genes, there was no need for whole genome sequences, now they know better. </p><p></p><p>Grace and peace,</p><p>Mark</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mark kennedy, post: 67195845, member: 29337"] Actually the early estimates were some 30,000 protein coding genes, the number finally fell below 20,000. The functional part of the genome is considerably larger and an enormous of RNA molecular mechanisms that can be coding about anywhere. There are molecular mechanisms that are involved in adaptive evolution but Darwinians don't want to admit it because that would suggest divine providence. I used to go on AIG regularly and when I started these debates I absolutely loved Apologetics Press. I had always favored Paleontology but the genetics stuff is so compelling and there is so much material available genomics seemed the best way to go. I remember I thought that has to be nonsense and as it turned out it was. There for a while people were saying that we should only worry about protein coding genes, there was no need for whole genome sequences, now they know better. Grace and peace, Mark [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Gorilla Genome
Top
Bottom