Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Good NEWS Atheists the answers to your TWO main questions.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hard_2_take_in" data-source="post: 1460741" data-attributes="member: 21621"><p>The first 2 chapters are very poorly put together, I know Moses was obviously writing b4 the modern development of literature but surely a GCSE essay is better constructed?</p><p> </p><p>Light and dark is created - then he skips back to it a few days later almost as an afterthought to throw in the stars sun and moon to separate the light from dark - day from night.</p><p></p><p>Then he throws in the creation of man male and female to multiply just like the other animals - then in ch2 Moses seems to revise this detail of human creation - now it seems God had only intended to create Adam, but if he did what were all the preordained souls from b4 creation going to do, as mentioned in Revelations, if God had only planned at first for one Adam. Then it seems Eve is an afterthought designed to keep Adam company - ????</p><p></p><p>There seems to be a lot of shoddy contradictions here - oris it just me. And what about that talking serpent - you dont get too many of them anymore. And what about these giants that lived at the time - menationed in subsequent chapters - archeology has still to turn up some of these boys though I suppose that is not tantamount to their non existance.</p><p>I guess I'm just peeved for I come from a church who believes in the literal interpretation of scripture - and for the first time I have taken the time to read more objectively - And that story about Noah cursing Ham - g tough break for Ham - Noah was a right old b, how some ppl suggest that Ham actually took sexual advantage of his pathetic drunken old dad beats me - talk about readin between the lines......</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hard_2_take_in, post: 1460741, member: 21621"] The first 2 chapters are very poorly put together, I know Moses was obviously writing b4 the modern development of literature but surely a GCSE essay is better constructed? Light and dark is created - then he skips back to it a few days later almost as an afterthought to throw in the stars sun and moon to separate the light from dark - day from night. Then he throws in the creation of man male and female to multiply just like the other animals - then in ch2 Moses seems to revise this detail of human creation - now it seems God had only intended to create Adam, but if he did what were all the preordained souls from b4 creation going to do, as mentioned in Revelations, if God had only planned at first for one Adam. Then it seems Eve is an afterthought designed to keep Adam company - ???? There seems to be a lot of shoddy contradictions here - oris it just me. And what about that talking serpent - you dont get too many of them anymore. And what about these giants that lived at the time - menationed in subsequent chapters - archeology has still to turn up some of these boys though I suppose that is not tantamount to their non existance. I guess I'm just peeved for I come from a church who believes in the literal interpretation of scripture - and for the first time I have taken the time to read more objectively - And that story about Noah cursing Ham - g tough break for Ham - Noah was a right old b, how some ppl suggest that Ham actually took sexual advantage of his pathetic drunken old dad beats me - talk about readin between the lines...... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Good NEWS Atheists the answers to your TWO main questions.
Top
Bottom