Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Geological dating techniques
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Subduction Zone" data-source="post: 71716620" data-attributes="member: 321072"><p>Yes, I saw that. So what? Have you seen the feet of Australopithecus?</p><p></p><p>Australopithecus was a hominin, they do not have a "true arch" but they have more of an arch than other apes. Here is another article on their feet that may help you:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://johnhawks.net/explainer/early-hominins/feet-australopithecus-afarensis/" target="_blank">The feet of Australopithecus afarensis</a></p><p></p><p>I do have a problem with some of the nomenclature in the article that you linked. They used the word "apes" improperly. What they should have said was "other apes" or "non-hominin" apes. You are I are apes after all. Denying facts will get you nowhere.</p><p></p><p>Those were simply the prints of a hominin, probably very closely related to Australopithecus, if not a member of that genus.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Subduction Zone, post: 71716620, member: 321072"] Yes, I saw that. So what? Have you seen the feet of Australopithecus? Australopithecus was a hominin, they do not have a "true arch" but they have more of an arch than other apes. Here is another article on their feet that may help you: [URL="http://johnhawks.net/explainer/early-hominins/feet-australopithecus-afarensis/"]The feet of Australopithecus afarensis[/URL] I do have a problem with some of the nomenclature in the article that you linked. They used the word "apes" improperly. What they should have said was "other apes" or "non-hominin" apes. You are I are apes after all. Denying facts will get you nowhere. Those were simply the prints of a hominin, probably very closely related to Australopithecus, if not a member of that genus. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Geological dating techniques
Top
Bottom