Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
FORMAL LOGIC -- Justifying that Initial Premises are TRUE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="partinobodycular" data-source="post: 77459620" data-attributes="member: 435281"><p>I would grant you the first two, <span style="font-size: 12px">(With a caveat) </span>but not a single one of the others. Yes, we all understand the concept behind the others, but we don't share a universal viewpoint on what the others entail. For example, to some people God is an actual being, but to others He's just a myth. Two completely different things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="partinobodycular, post: 77459620, member: 435281"] I would grant you the first two, [SIZE=3](With a caveat) [/SIZE]but not a single one of the others. Yes, we all understand the concept behind the others, but we don't share a universal viewpoint on what the others entail. For example, to some people God is an actual being, but to others He's just a myth. Two completely different things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
FORMAL LOGIC -- Justifying that Initial Premises are TRUE
Top
Bottom