Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Federal Appeals Court upholds injunction against Obama amnesty
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vylo" data-source="post: 68026197" data-attributes="member: 10362"><p>It is inefficient to deport millions of people, who are currently contributing to our economy. We are pretty well subsidized by illegal labor.</p><p></p><p>It is morally dubious as you are talking about sending millions of otherwise innocent people out of the country and breaking up families, etc. to do it. </p><p></p><p>Of course legally, yes it would be right to deport them, but considering the laws have failed to do what they were designed for, doing what is legal, might not be doing what is right and/or expedient for the nation and its people.</p><p></p><p>The best course would be to grant amnesty for those who have otherwise been law-abiding citizens, especially, if not only, those who have paid taxes (which an estimated 3 million of them have done). Then we have to actually make our border secure and revamp our immigration laws to make them effective so we don't end up in this situation again, because really, there isn't a good outcome no matter which we choose.</p><p></p><p>We can try and deport all the illegals, spending and losing hundreds of billions of dollars, or we can give amnesty which shows contempt for our laws. There isn't a good choice, we are faced with choosing the better of 2 evils because we failed to enforce our immigration laws to the point where doing so now would be chaotic and insanely costly, both fiscally, and on a human level.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vylo, post: 68026197, member: 10362"] It is inefficient to deport millions of people, who are currently contributing to our economy. We are pretty well subsidized by illegal labor. It is morally dubious as you are talking about sending millions of otherwise innocent people out of the country and breaking up families, etc. to do it. Of course legally, yes it would be right to deport them, but considering the laws have failed to do what they were designed for, doing what is legal, might not be doing what is right and/or expedient for the nation and its people. The best course would be to grant amnesty for those who have otherwise been law-abiding citizens, especially, if not only, those who have paid taxes (which an estimated 3 million of them have done). Then we have to actually make our border secure and revamp our immigration laws to make them effective so we don't end up in this situation again, because really, there isn't a good outcome no matter which we choose. We can try and deport all the illegals, spending and losing hundreds of billions of dollars, or we can give amnesty which shows contempt for our laws. There isn't a good choice, we are faced with choosing the better of 2 evils because we failed to enforce our immigration laws to the point where doing so now would be chaotic and insanely costly, both fiscally, and on a human level. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Federal Appeals Court upholds injunction against Obama amnesty
Top
Bottom