Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
Regions of the World
Australian & New Zealand
Family First member in inappropriate content scandal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tgg" data-source="post: 40275612" data-attributes="member: 115094"><p>Personally, I do not object to inappropriate content as long as it ONLY features consenting adults and does not depict them having sex with kids, animals or the use of human excrement. That stuff is pretty off in my book.And I also do not buy into the lame, one-sided argument that 'inappropriate content degrades women'. Many women who have made inappropriate content have said it makes them feel liberated, whilst as a masculinist I also object to the sexual objectification of men in far more mainstream circumstances such as in videos that are played on Video Hits and sports where they are required to perform with their shirts off. I believe in equality for BOTH sexes. With that said, I think inappropriate content sites are not appropriate for display in places like public libraries or schools, or for use by rapists. The reality is however that a good 30% of the male population who view (and enjoy) inappropriate contentographic material tend to be males from the ages of 14 - 18, and there is little that society can do to stop them. I mean, I read soft inappropriate content stuff when I was a teenager and it certainly did not turn me into a crazed sex offender. Punishing boys for discovering their newly found sexuality does more harm than good, and this is why a lot of guys who have been subjected punishment end up being the very sort of people that both Christian and secular society despise when you come to think of it.Look at Prohibition: when the governments sought to make drinking alcohol a criminal offence back in the 1920's, it caused more social problems than when it was readily available. An incident like this has caused to me to lose my faith in conservative people and politicians altogether. Jimmy Swaggart was bad enough, but this fellow is the proverbial straw that's broken the camel's back.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tgg, post: 40275612, member: 115094"] Personally, I do not object to inappropriate content as long as it ONLY features consenting adults and does not depict them having sex with kids, animals or the use of human excrement. That stuff is pretty off in my book.And I also do not buy into the lame, one-sided argument that 'inappropriate content degrades women'. Many women who have made inappropriate content have said it makes them feel liberated, whilst as a masculinist I also object to the sexual objectification of men in far more mainstream circumstances such as in videos that are played on Video Hits and sports where they are required to perform with their shirts off. I believe in equality for BOTH sexes. With that said, I think inappropriate content sites are not appropriate for display in places like public libraries or schools, or for use by rapists. The reality is however that a good 30% of the male population who view (and enjoy) inappropriate contentographic material tend to be males from the ages of 14 - 18, and there is little that society can do to stop them. I mean, I read soft inappropriate content stuff when I was a teenager and it certainly did not turn me into a crazed sex offender. Punishing boys for discovering their newly found sexuality does more harm than good, and this is why a lot of guys who have been subjected punishment end up being the very sort of people that both Christian and secular society despise when you come to think of it.Look at Prohibition: when the governments sought to make drinking alcohol a criminal offence back in the 1920's, it caused more social problems than when it was readily available. An incident like this has caused to me to lose my faith in conservative people and politicians altogether. Jimmy Swaggart was bad enough, but this fellow is the proverbial straw that's broken the camel's back. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
Regions of the World
Australian & New Zealand
Family First member in inappropriate content scandal
Top
Bottom