Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
Regions of the World
Australian & New Zealand
Family First member in inappropriate content scandal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GodsoldierClintus" data-source="post: 40213101" data-attributes="member: 189419"><p>On the inappropriate content issue - banning inappropriate content in its internet forms does not mean there are not inappropriate content magazines and soft-core inappropriate contentography available at newsagents. Look at advertisements used all over the place - sex sells. Reversing all those forms of inappropriate contentography and incorrect use of (mostly) female sexuality is not going to bring anyone closer to Christ. </p><p></p><p>My point was not that we shouldn't ban inappropriate content anyway - it seems a rather nice way of pulling votes by being hard line on something. But as I said initially a lot of Christians themselves do not have control over inappropriate content and list - and then of course a member of FF itself did not have control over. It comes out as hypocritical and stupid. Setting out blanket "Christian" rules in society does not bring anyone closer to a relationship with Christ. Especially when as Christians we aren't exactly sparkly clean on this issue either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GodsoldierClintus, post: 40213101, member: 189419"] On the inappropriate content issue - banning inappropriate content in its internet forms does not mean there are not inappropriate content magazines and soft-core inappropriate contentography available at newsagents. Look at advertisements used all over the place - sex sells. Reversing all those forms of inappropriate contentography and incorrect use of (mostly) female sexuality is not going to bring anyone closer to Christ. My point was not that we shouldn't ban inappropriate content anyway - it seems a rather nice way of pulling votes by being hard line on something. But as I said initially a lot of Christians themselves do not have control over inappropriate content and list - and then of course a member of FF itself did not have control over. It comes out as hypocritical and stupid. Setting out blanket "Christian" rules in society does not bring anyone closer to a relationship with Christ. Especially when as Christians we aren't exactly sparkly clean on this issue either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
Regions of the World
Australian & New Zealand
Family First member in inappropriate content scandal
Top
Bottom