Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Exploiting the Poor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="praying" data-source="post: 13635034" data-attributes="member: 22706"><p>Let's not mince words just give me a big red <span style="color: Red">F </span> professor. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /> </p><p></p><p>So you disagree? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay I see you misunderstood, when I said "ethically nice" and hindsight being what it is that was the wrong word, I meant that would be really nice if you could pay people what they needed based on their family situations. Develop some sort of actuarial table that determined the levels from single to say a family of 10. Sounds nice but that would require much altruism on the part of every member of society and we know that isn't happening and the from a business side, businesses could never calculate their payroll expenses because it would be constantly in flux based on the demographic of its' current employees. </p><p></p><p>So all that being said we are back to the poor and how to help them. Also you still haven't explained how Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson exploit the poor by earning money from speaking engagements to discuss these issues.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="praying, post: 13635034, member: 22706"] Let's not mince words just give me a big red [COLOR=Red]F [/COLOR] professor. :P So you disagree? ;) Okay I see you misunderstood, when I said "ethically nice" and hindsight being what it is that was the wrong word, I meant that would be really nice if you could pay people what they needed based on their family situations. Develop some sort of actuarial table that determined the levels from single to say a family of 10. Sounds nice but that would require much altruism on the part of every member of society and we know that isn't happening and the from a business side, businesses could never calculate their payroll expenses because it would be constantly in flux based on the demographic of its' current employees. So all that being said we are back to the poor and how to help them. Also you still haven't explained how Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson exploit the poor by earning money from speaking engagements to discuss these issues. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Exploiting the Poor
Top
Bottom