Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evolution Experiment: Creationists, Choose their Fate!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jax5434" data-source="post: 71862280" data-attributes="member: 206622"><p>I was not commenting on evolution so much as the proposed experiment. The experiment as proposed would require a guiding intelligence (the experimenter) to determine what traits were to be selected for, to determine the end purpose (speciation) and to purposefully isolate the preferred breeding populations. None of these things are true for evolution "in the wild". The experiment as proposed could at best demonstrate that a guiding intelligence might possibly drive evolution thru harsh intelligent selection. That is not the random chance and mutation the TOE presents.</p><p> Almost all Christians accept micro-evolution as self evidently true. Macro evolution is where the disputes come in. Natural Selection and random mutations are also obviously true. What is in doubt is whether in combination they have the creative power to account for the diversity of life we see. </p><p></p><p>God Bless</p><p>Jax</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jax5434, post: 71862280, member: 206622"] I was not commenting on evolution so much as the proposed experiment. The experiment as proposed would require a guiding intelligence (the experimenter) to determine what traits were to be selected for, to determine the end purpose (speciation) and to purposefully isolate the preferred breeding populations. None of these things are true for evolution "in the wild". The experiment as proposed could at best demonstrate that a guiding intelligence might possibly drive evolution thru harsh intelligent selection. That is not the random chance and mutation the TOE presents. Almost all Christians accept micro-evolution as self evidently true. Macro evolution is where the disputes come in. Natural Selection and random mutations are also obviously true. What is in doubt is whether in combination they have the creative power to account for the diversity of life we see. God Bless Jax [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evolution Experiment: Creationists, Choose their Fate!
Top
Bottom