Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
Evidence other than hearsay
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gumph" data-source="post: 73455803" data-attributes="member: 358578"><p>Well, its not only me. There are apparently 5 billion other folk on this planet who are not convinced either and I also suspect that many of the 2 billion or so who claim they do believe, only say so to prevent peer ridicule.</p><p></p><p>Looking at this detectives views is going to achieve absolutely nothing. What exactly does he prove? At best he will prove some consensus on what people say they saw at a particular event. How on earth is he going to prove that Mary was a virgin, or that Jesus rose from the dead, or that God gave 10 commandments to Moses when he was by himself?</p><p></p><p>All he is doing is using man made documents to try and verify other man made documents. Yet again we are expected to take the word of a fallible human being. This does not make any sense to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gumph, post: 73455803, member: 358578"] Well, its not only me. There are apparently 5 billion other folk on this planet who are not convinced either and I also suspect that many of the 2 billion or so who claim they do believe, only say so to prevent peer ridicule. Looking at this detectives views is going to achieve absolutely nothing. What exactly does he prove? At best he will prove some consensus on what people say they saw at a particular event. How on earth is he going to prove that Mary was a virgin, or that Jesus rose from the dead, or that God gave 10 commandments to Moses when he was by himself? All he is doing is using man made documents to try and verify other man made documents. Yet again we are expected to take the word of a fallible human being. This does not make any sense to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
Evidence other than hearsay
Top
Bottom