Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Does Science Agree With the Bible?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="katerinah1947" data-source="post: 69259450" data-attributes="member: 373043"><p>Hi, (edits going on now) (done)</p><p></p><p>Calibrate everything.</p><p></p><p>If a single item used is not recently calibrated, all the data is thrown out, as that is an unknown now.</p><p></p><p>Our manager never had group meetings, as no two of us ever worked on the same project, typically.</p><p></p><p>Later whenever possible, I did 1:1 correlations.</p><p></p><p>The work mentioned was not statistical, nor a statistically repeating set of tests to slowly approach a 1:1 correlation, if possible or actually there.</p><p></p><p>The search was world wide, but that was not forced., as in science, the kind I knew no differently in, as that was my whole existence in a sense, as I had my BSEE, equivalent by age 21 and 7/12ths years old at the time, not counting conception which would increase my actual age by .75 years typically, and I was working for the top research Company in America within three months of graduation, and later would continue to work with my parents, simultaneously, in both their lives as my parents and their business as their source of economic survival among other things there too, as such being nothing more than a nerd^^3, and a mushroom^^4, possibly, all I ever knew then was how to do provable research with proofs, and the proofs had to stand up also, so as a world wide search was used, the data was taken and calibrated wherever the data was found.</p><p></p><p>All data is thrown out whenever possible. There is a constant battle going on, with trying to prove any mistake is made in the data. It's vicious and horrible in a way. And, I am under constant scrutiny.</p><p></p><p>As a result, what survives, usually is totally right, if it shows anything at all.</p><p></p><p>At work, even I was right, and my proof failed, I failed. If anyone's proof failed, they failed, even if they were right.</p><p></p><p>Proofs were everything in a way.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, Full Scientific Rigor, Controls, Discipline, were used in that work.</p><p></p><p>And, it was done at the walking text book level, meaning the equivalent of noted Researchers, that others use for a reference, when need information, and the researcher in question has that finding.</p><p></p><p>Your suppositions, that many in Australia would respond, means there is much fun there.</p><p></p><p>What do you think the God, climate is like, when working with the top 5%, of the most academically accomplished people in the world?, it is probably thinner, than what you mention.</p><p></p><p>Make no mistakes. Scientists are very much in to God, but in this way.</p><p></p><p> They are all Priests and Ministers and even prophets of a sort also, but do not know nor use, but one thing Theologically, and are deeply, in good, with God, for working for Him, and falling deeply in love, with the beauty and ways of God!!!</p><p></p><p>These are the subdue the earth boys and girls. The Genesis 1:28, subdue the earth boys and girls.</p><p></p><p>Now, this is how to use those results, scientifically, in the Genesis 1:28, subdue the earth way.</p><p></p><p>Do not accept what I said. Prove that it is not true,,, in your own experimenting with it. Or, test it to see if it is true.</p><p></p><p>You do not own that information, until you understand it, and you have proven it is true.</p><p></p><p>Developers come. Researchers research. Later, if a developer, uses a researchers work and still finds it works, production may take place, then workers all over the world use that product or information.</p><p></p><p>The work was done at the research level. I use it at the customer level.</p><p></p><p>Does that make sense?</p><p></p><p>LOVE,</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="katerinah1947, post: 69259450, member: 373043"] Hi, (edits going on now) (done) Calibrate everything. If a single item used is not recently calibrated, all the data is thrown out, as that is an unknown now. Our manager never had group meetings, as no two of us ever worked on the same project, typically. Later whenever possible, I did 1:1 correlations. The work mentioned was not statistical, nor a statistically repeating set of tests to slowly approach a 1:1 correlation, if possible or actually there. The search was world wide, but that was not forced., as in science, the kind I knew no differently in, as that was my whole existence in a sense, as I had my BSEE, equivalent by age 21 and 7/12ths years old at the time, not counting conception which would increase my actual age by .75 years typically, and I was working for the top research Company in America within three months of graduation, and later would continue to work with my parents, simultaneously, in both their lives as my parents and their business as their source of economic survival among other things there too, as such being nothing more than a nerd^^3, and a mushroom^^4, possibly, all I ever knew then was how to do provable research with proofs, and the proofs had to stand up also, so as a world wide search was used, the data was taken and calibrated wherever the data was found. All data is thrown out whenever possible. There is a constant battle going on, with trying to prove any mistake is made in the data. It's vicious and horrible in a way. And, I am under constant scrutiny. As a result, what survives, usually is totally right, if it shows anything at all. At work, even I was right, and my proof failed, I failed. If anyone's proof failed, they failed, even if they were right. Proofs were everything in a way. Yes, Full Scientific Rigor, Controls, Discipline, were used in that work. And, it was done at the walking text book level, meaning the equivalent of noted Researchers, that others use for a reference, when need information, and the researcher in question has that finding. Your suppositions, that many in Australia would respond, means there is much fun there. What do you think the God, climate is like, when working with the top 5%, of the most academically accomplished people in the world?, it is probably thinner, than what you mention. Make no mistakes. Scientists are very much in to God, but in this way. They are all Priests and Ministers and even prophets of a sort also, but do not know nor use, but one thing Theologically, and are deeply, in good, with God, for working for Him, and falling deeply in love, with the beauty and ways of God!!! These are the subdue the earth boys and girls. The Genesis 1:28, subdue the earth boys and girls. Now, this is how to use those results, scientifically, in the Genesis 1:28, subdue the earth way. Do not accept what I said. Prove that it is not true,,, in your own experimenting with it. Or, test it to see if it is true. You do not own that information, until you understand it, and you have proven it is true. Developers come. Researchers research. Later, if a developer, uses a researchers work and still finds it works, production may take place, then workers all over the world use that product or information. The work was done at the research level. I use it at the customer level. Does that make sense? LOVE, [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Does Science Agree With the Bible?
Top
Bottom