Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Dissecting an actual science article
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dad" data-source="post: 69993549" data-attributes="member: 98011"><p>Constrain how? Seems like you are saying contstrain to present state worl laws...tight? If you claim otherwise explain?</p><p> Seems like you are saying that seeing certain compositions (based on how we would get those compositions in this state) take on meaning. Correct? All based on assuming that this state had to be involved in getting the compositions. In other words blind faih in a certain state in the past. Totally assumed without question. Believed. Unproven in the extreme.</p><p></p><p> There we have it. Phase equilibria. We look at what causes these sort of phase changes on earth, using our laws etc...and then project that onto Mercury in the far far far unnown state past.</p><p>This is religious twaddle.</p><p></p><p> Same as above. '<em><u>Seems</u> consistent with a same state past faity tale...best we can come up with using the same state past religion</em>'.</p><p></p><p></p><p> "Required" means using present state earth laws. End of story.</p><p></p><p> meaningless speculation. Imaginary time invoked to explain how a non created world may have ceased producing molten rock a long long time ago, in the unknown state of the past. Anti Christ (creator) fables. Anyone that calls this science is truly an ignoramus.</p><p></p><p> Who knows? You are suggesting there is no other way to try to explain anything BUT by your godless anti Christ same state past religion. Crystals will happen in the future nature according to Scripture. Why not the past too?? Who cares how crystals are or must now be formed??</p><p> Same idiocy. Tell us why density of craters equals billions of years? Really. Try to tell us why. The answer will be same state past religion pretending it is science.</p><p> No. I posted an article a few days ago on this thread dealing exactly with the density of craters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dad, post: 69993549, member: 98011"] Constrain how? Seems like you are saying contstrain to present state worl laws...tight? If you claim otherwise explain? Seems like you are saying that seeing certain compositions (based on how we would get those compositions in this state) take on meaning. Correct? All based on assuming that this state had to be involved in getting the compositions. In other words blind faih in a certain state in the past. Totally assumed without question. Believed. Unproven in the extreme. There we have it. Phase equilibria. We look at what causes these sort of phase changes on earth, using our laws etc...and then project that onto Mercury in the far far far unnown state past. This is religious twaddle. Same as above. '[I][U]Seems[/U] consistent with a same state past faity tale...best we can come up with using the same state past religion[/I]'. "Required" means using present state earth laws. End of story. meaningless speculation. Imaginary time invoked to explain how a non created world may have ceased producing molten rock a long long time ago, in the unknown state of the past. Anti Christ (creator) fables. Anyone that calls this science is truly an ignoramus. Who knows? You are suggesting there is no other way to try to explain anything BUT by your godless anti Christ same state past religion. Crystals will happen in the future nature according to Scripture. Why not the past too?? Who cares how crystals are or must now be formed?? Same idiocy. Tell us why density of craters equals billions of years? Really. Try to tell us why. The answer will be same state past religion pretending it is science. No. I posted an article a few days ago on this thread dealing exactly with the density of craters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Dissecting an actual science article
Top
Bottom