Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Dissecting an actual science article
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dad" data-source="post: 69981755" data-attributes="member: 98011"><p>It is an article. So there. News articles about science are articles.</p><p></p><p> As much as I'd like to let you redefine the language, sorry..</p><p></p><p>noun</p><p>1.</p><p>a written composition in prose, usually nonfiction, on a specific topic, forming an independent part of a book or other publication, as anewspaper or magazine.</p><p> An article in a science site about science stuff is an article about science. How about addressing what the scientists claimed? After all, we are not from the intellectual shallow end of the gene pool here are we??</p><p> The OP is not about that. It is about one aspect from the study in a science article on a science site. Do you claim that the material is not genuine? Do you claim they do not determine ages of when rock melted that way? Try a little honesty here.</p><p> If I was marking posters on what they contributed about the topic and bits of a news article on science that was posted in an OP, you would get expelled from school for insubordination. So much for playing the what if game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dad, post: 69981755, member: 98011"] It is an article. So there. News articles about science are articles. As much as I'd like to let you redefine the language, sorry.. noun 1. a written composition in prose, usually nonfiction, on a specific topic, forming an independent part of a book or other publication, as anewspaper or magazine. An article in a science site about science stuff is an article about science. How about addressing what the scientists claimed? After all, we are not from the intellectual shallow end of the gene pool here are we?? The OP is not about that. It is about one aspect from the study in a science article on a science site. Do you claim that the material is not genuine? Do you claim they do not determine ages of when rock melted that way? Try a little honesty here. If I was marking posters on what they contributed about the topic and bits of a news article on science that was posted in an OP, you would get expelled from school for insubordination. So much for playing the what if game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Dissecting an actual science article
Top
Bottom