Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
[debunked] Can new information be added to DNA?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="essentialsaltes" data-source="post: 69440434" data-attributes="member: 294566"><p>If it's true that "information" is equivalent (to the antievolutionist) to "biochemical reactions" then we know that <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nylon-eating_bacteria" target="_blank">new biochemical reactions have evolved</a>.</p><p></p><p>"There is scientific consensus that the capacity to synthesize nylonase most probably developed as a single-step mutation that survived because it improved the fitness of the bacteria possessing the mutation. More importantly: The enzyme involved has been produced by a mutation completely randomizing the original gene. Despite this, the new gene still had a novel, albeit weak, catalytic capacity. This is seen as a good example of how mutations easily can provide the raw material for <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution" target="_blank"><u>evolution</u></a> by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selection" target="_blank"><u>natural selection</u>"</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="essentialsaltes, post: 69440434, member: 294566"] If it's true that "information" is equivalent (to the antievolutionist) to "biochemical reactions" then we know that [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nylon-eating_bacteria']new biochemical reactions have evolved[/URL]. "There is scientific consensus that the capacity to synthesize nylonase most probably developed as a single-step mutation that survived because it improved the fitness of the bacteria possessing the mutation. More importantly: The enzyme involved has been produced by a mutation completely randomizing the original gene. Despite this, the new gene still had a novel, albeit weak, catalytic capacity. This is seen as a good example of how mutations easily can provide the raw material for [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution'][U]evolution[/U][/URL] by [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selection'][U]natural selection[/U]"[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
[debunked] Can new information be added to DNA?
Top
Bottom