Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dealing with Creationism in Astronomy - Magnetic Reconnection
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 63693610" data-attributes="member: 627"><p><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/the-heart-of-space-weather-observed-in-action/#.Ue6o_qwpjZ2" target="_blank">The Heart of Space Weather Observed in Action | NASA</a></p><p></p><p>This other video cited by Bridgman to support "magnetic reconnection" is another good example of a "dumbed down" explanation of arcade loops. The person in the video notes that they cannot observe the magnetic field "lines" as they call them, they observe the million degree particles that run along the 'flux rope". What the video fails to mention is that it's not just 'magnetic lines' that are 'reconnecting' at those locations, it is multiple (two or more) current carrying plasma filaments that 'rewire' themselves in the atmosphere as *current* seeks the path of least resistance through plasma.</p><p></p><p>It's not actually "magnetic lines" that disconnect or reconnect, it's *current* that rewires itself inside of a double layer. The double layer paper by Hannes Alfven makes the whole concept of ''magnetic reconnection' unnecessary and irrelevant in current carrying environments.</p><p></p><p>The energy that is released inside the double layer is due to the kinetic energy of the charged particles that traverse each loop, and traverse the double layer between the loops as the currents inside the double layer begins to 'reconnect'. </p><p></p><p>FYI, the transfer of magnetic field energy into particle kinetic energy has a proper name. It's called "induction', which of course does take place too. It is however the *600,000,000 to 1,000,000,000 volts that drives the process, not just dumbed down magnetic lines.</p><p></p><p>FYI, it's also disingenuous for Bridgman and the mainstream to be claiming that this represents 'magnetic reconnection' considering the fact that they lost their primary energy source to explain those 'magnetic lines' when they discovered that convection was much slower than predicted, just 1 percent of their predicted value. One percent!</p><p></p><p>I love how Bridgman just *ignores* the observations that falsify his own beliefs, yet he keeps harping on EU proponents without even properly understanding the range of 'electric sun models' that EU/PC theory has to offer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 63693610, member: 627"] [URL="http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/the-heart-of-space-weather-observed-in-action/#.Ue6o_qwpjZ2"]The Heart of Space Weather Observed in Action | NASA[/URL] This other video cited by Bridgman to support "magnetic reconnection" is another good example of a "dumbed down" explanation of arcade loops. The person in the video notes that they cannot observe the magnetic field "lines" as they call them, they observe the million degree particles that run along the 'flux rope". What the video fails to mention is that it's not just 'magnetic lines' that are 'reconnecting' at those locations, it is multiple (two or more) current carrying plasma filaments that 'rewire' themselves in the atmosphere as *current* seeks the path of least resistance through plasma. It's not actually "magnetic lines" that disconnect or reconnect, it's *current* that rewires itself inside of a double layer. The double layer paper by Hannes Alfven makes the whole concept of ''magnetic reconnection' unnecessary and irrelevant in current carrying environments. The energy that is released inside the double layer is due to the kinetic energy of the charged particles that traverse each loop, and traverse the double layer between the loops as the currents inside the double layer begins to 'reconnect'. FYI, the transfer of magnetic field energy into particle kinetic energy has a proper name. It's called "induction', which of course does take place too. It is however the *600,000,000 to 1,000,000,000 volts that drives the process, not just dumbed down magnetic lines. FYI, it's also disingenuous for Bridgman and the mainstream to be claiming that this represents 'magnetic reconnection' considering the fact that they lost their primary energy source to explain those 'magnetic lines' when they discovered that convection was much slower than predicted, just 1 percent of their predicted value. One percent! I love how Bridgman just *ignores* the observations that falsify his own beliefs, yet he keeps harping on EU proponents without even properly understanding the range of 'electric sun models' that EU/PC theory has to offer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dealing with Creationism in Astronomy - Magnetic Reconnection
Top
Bottom