Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dark Matter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justatruthseeker" data-source="post: 65066577" data-attributes="member: 332164"><p>And you have to modify the gravitational formula that works just perfectly except when you want to apply it to galaxy rotation curves. But, if you took the electrical force into consideration in plasma, 99% of the universe, which is 10^39 powers stronger than the gravitational force, you wouldn't need dark matter, you wouldn't need to modify the gravitational formulas. Everything would work just fine with physics as we understand it today.</p><p></p><p>The problem with modifying the gravitational formulas, is you have to do it selectively. Those formulas work just fine in the solar system without need of modification, dark matter, dark energy or any of the Fairie Dust of modern astronomy. Modifying the formulas selectively is no different than adding Fairie Dust dark matter just where it is needed to make the math work. Just another gap-filler to make the math of a gravitational only theory fit a semblance of reality.</p><p></p><p>The universe is not gravitational only, and that is why Fairie Dust is needed. Plasma reacts strongly to EM forces, but those are not considered in current astronomical theories. Theories devised before we had an inkling of how dominant plasma was in the make-up of the universe. Tired, old theories that astronomers need to let die a quite death.</p><p></p><p>Dark matter, MOND, no difference between the two. Both are ad-hoc gap-fillers to keep a gravitational only theory alive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justatruthseeker, post: 65066577, member: 332164"] And you have to modify the gravitational formula that works just perfectly except when you want to apply it to galaxy rotation curves. But, if you took the electrical force into consideration in plasma, 99% of the universe, which is 10^39 powers stronger than the gravitational force, you wouldn't need dark matter, you wouldn't need to modify the gravitational formulas. Everything would work just fine with physics as we understand it today. The problem with modifying the gravitational formulas, is you have to do it selectively. Those formulas work just fine in the solar system without need of modification, dark matter, dark energy or any of the Fairie Dust of modern astronomy. Modifying the formulas selectively is no different than adding Fairie Dust dark matter just where it is needed to make the math work. Just another gap-filler to make the math of a gravitational only theory fit a semblance of reality. The universe is not gravitational only, and that is why Fairie Dust is needed. Plasma reacts strongly to EM forces, but those are not considered in current astronomical theories. Theories devised before we had an inkling of how dominant plasma was in the make-up of the universe. Tired, old theories that astronomers need to let die a quite death. Dark matter, MOND, no difference between the two. Both are ad-hoc gap-fillers to keep a gravitational only theory alive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dark Matter
Top
Bottom