Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dark Matter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 65061630" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>Even the mainstream explanation *nailed it*. The matter that *passes on through* are the stars and that super/ultramassive black hole. The gas/plasma is the stuff that slams into each other and "glows brightly* as a result. So what?</p><p></p><p>Ya, those million degree plasma clouds *slammed* into each other alright.</p><p> </p><p>The black holes, as well as the stars are space so far apart, they don't "hit" each other. Their momentum carries them on just as it always does. A collision with a little "wispy plasma cloud" isn't going to slow them down much.</p><p></p><p>Yes, stars do that.</p><p></p><p>Even the mainstream's explanation is "relatively" correct, and I already cited a reference for you. Apparently you however believe that stars are magical because they are spaced far apart. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>How about because they came up empty three times in a row at LHC, at LUX and again in those electron experiments? How *can* anyone actually falsify your beliefs again?</p><p></p><p>You should go with the published claims of the Nobel prize winning physicists like Hannes Alfven, or his student Anthony Peratt. What "real scientists" have any published rebuttal to any of their work?</p><p></p><p>Nothing is being hidden from anyone in any SDO, SOHO or TRACE images. IRIS pretty much blew their entire atmospheric theory out of the water, and <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/09/weak-solar-convection-approximately-100-times-slower-than-scientists-had-previously-projected/" target="_blank">SDO already *destroyed* their convection claims</a>. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Your debate tactics are juvenile. You insert the obligatory ad hom in every post while running away from the Nobel Prize winning authors work with your tail between your legs. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 65061630, member: 627"] Even the mainstream explanation *nailed it*. The matter that *passes on through* are the stars and that super/ultramassive black hole. The gas/plasma is the stuff that slams into each other and "glows brightly* as a result. So what? Ya, those million degree plasma clouds *slammed* into each other alright. The black holes, as well as the stars are space so far apart, they don't "hit" each other. Their momentum carries them on just as it always does. A collision with a little "wispy plasma cloud" isn't going to slow them down much. Yes, stars do that. Even the mainstream's explanation is "relatively" correct, and I already cited a reference for you. Apparently you however believe that stars are magical because they are spaced far apart. :) How about because they came up empty three times in a row at LHC, at LUX and again in those electron experiments? How *can* anyone actually falsify your beliefs again? You should go with the published claims of the Nobel prize winning physicists like Hannes Alfven, or his student Anthony Peratt. What "real scientists" have any published rebuttal to any of their work? Nothing is being hidden from anyone in any SDO, SOHO or TRACE images. IRIS pretty much blew their entire atmospheric theory out of the water, and [URL="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/09/weak-solar-convection-approximately-100-times-slower-than-scientists-had-previously-projected/"]SDO already *destroyed* their convection claims[/URL]. :) Your debate tactics are juvenile. You insert the obligatory ad hom in every post while running away from the Nobel Prize winning authors work with your tail between your legs. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dark Matter
Top
Bottom