Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dark Matter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 65061385" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>Huh? Who said anything about anyone "not discovering evidence" to support EU/PC theory? They're doing it *constantly* in fact! They found evidence to support EU/PC theory when they found out they botched their baryonic mass estimates by underestimating the amount of light being scattered. They did it again when the discovered they underestimated the number of stars in a galaxy. They did it again when they found out that black holes were much larger than they thought. They did it again in the lab three straight times in the last 18 months too when they found evidence that their own beliefs in exotic matter were flawed. They did it again when they found all that plasma around our galaxy in 2012. What are you talking about? They are *destroying* their own beliefs, and finding more plasma *constantly*.</p><p></p><p>The difference is that the EU/PC community has published and put forth their own peer reviewed support and they do have *real and actual* evidence to support an *opposing* theory. </p><p> </p><p>There's a certain amount of irony in that paragraph from my vantage point. Three straight lab failures, yet they want to believe in it so badly, they just don't care. The mainstream constantly tries to 'trash' EU/PC theory, but always by citing *random websites*, never based on *published* material. Same dance as creationists, different tune.</p><p></p><p>Keep in mind that there is absolutely, positively no empirical cause/effect justification in *any* of their claims. Photons are not affected by "dark energy' in the lab. They are not affected in the slightest by "space expansion" in the lab. They don't "bend around" exotic matter in the lab either. Inflation hasn't had any effect on any photon in any lab, not ever. Talk about "wanting to believe"! Their whole belief systems is based on *desire*, and healthy dose of simply *ignoring* the data that falsifies their beliefs!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 65061385, member: 627"] Huh? Who said anything about anyone "not discovering evidence" to support EU/PC theory? They're doing it *constantly* in fact! They found evidence to support EU/PC theory when they found out they botched their baryonic mass estimates by underestimating the amount of light being scattered. They did it again when the discovered they underestimated the number of stars in a galaxy. They did it again when they found out that black holes were much larger than they thought. They did it again in the lab three straight times in the last 18 months too when they found evidence that their own beliefs in exotic matter were flawed. They did it again when they found all that plasma around our galaxy in 2012. What are you talking about? They are *destroying* their own beliefs, and finding more plasma *constantly*. The difference is that the EU/PC community has published and put forth their own peer reviewed support and they do have *real and actual* evidence to support an *opposing* theory. There's a certain amount of irony in that paragraph from my vantage point. Three straight lab failures, yet they want to believe in it so badly, they just don't care. The mainstream constantly tries to 'trash' EU/PC theory, but always by citing *random websites*, never based on *published* material. Same dance as creationists, different tune. Keep in mind that there is absolutely, positively no empirical cause/effect justification in *any* of their claims. Photons are not affected by "dark energy' in the lab. They are not affected in the slightest by "space expansion" in the lab. They don't "bend around" exotic matter in the lab either. Inflation hasn't had any effect on any photon in any lab, not ever. Talk about "wanting to believe"! Their whole belief systems is based on *desire*, and healthy dose of simply *ignoring* the data that falsifies their beliefs! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dark Matter
Top
Bottom