Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dark Matter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 65061288" data-attributes="member: 627"><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Every word of that is *false*. We *have* since found all kids of additional mass in just the last few years, *all* of it in the form of *plasma*.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><a href="http://www.space.com/17734-milky-way-galaxy-giant-gas-halo.html" target="_blank">Colossal Gas Cloud Discovered Around Milky Way | Space.com</a></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>That's just the mass they found in 2012, not to mention the miscount of the stars in galaxies and the fact the galaxies are twice as bright as they *assumed*.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>How do they know that? They are essentially peddling *limited technology* as some sort of knowledge statement about what that missing mass does or does not do. The dogma just began....</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p></p><p>Again, this simply *assumes* that only gravity is relevant with describing the movements of *plasma*. You can't even know if it's *gravity* that is acting on the process or *some other force*. Peratt's theory demonstrates that it could be ordinary EM fields!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 65061288, member: 627"] [I] Every word of that is *false*. We *have* since found all kids of additional mass in just the last few years, *all* of it in the form of *plasma*. [url=http://www.space.com/17734-milky-way-galaxy-giant-gas-halo.html]Colossal Gas Cloud Discovered Around Milky Way | Space.com[/url] That's just the mass they found in 2012, not to mention the miscount of the stars in galaxies and the fact the galaxies are twice as bright as they *assumed*. How do they know that? They are essentially peddling *limited technology* as some sort of knowledge statement about what that missing mass does or does not do. The dogma just began.... [/I] Again, this simply *assumes* that only gravity is relevant with describing the movements of *plasma*. You can't even know if it's *gravity* that is acting on the process or *some other force*. Peratt's theory demonstrates that it could be ordinary EM fields! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Dark Matter
Top
Bottom